Should we be comforted that their priorities are as bad as ours?
There is no such thing as intellectual property.
Is anyone free to speak to their family, their teachers, or their employers? Is anyone listening? The whole notion is dishonest.
The suddenness is that of a busker trying to keep up with their audience.
There are a higher proportion here of persons who think scientifically. There is no automatic intersection between that and politics; any intersection must be forced. But when it is forced, it will be found that…
Not unravelling. Refocusing. The peasant ideology will always dominate, until it takes the species down with it.
6000 people are being committed to this project today so that they can be fired day-after-tomorrow.
"made", or "was given"?
All while successive technological discoveries raise the minimum standard of thought: vertiginously, incomprehensibly, unattainably. Something's got to give.
"Society" (i.e. northern European and Anglophone) doesn't want to be improved.
The opacity is the point.
Future historians -- far, far future, if at all -- will place Timothy Dexter and Elon Musk in the same category.
It is no good saying that "...engineers know how to solve distributed trust problems...." Some engineers do, but much of the code (not only AI, but across all industries) is being written by engineers who do not.
The difference between meritocracy and "meritocracy" is that the former is a training function, whose goal is to learn the set of contributors whose contributions can be ignored. In "meritocracy", on the other hand,…
Talk about the emotional illness of the owning and managing classes, taking the form of two paranoid delusions: 1. That all of their employees and customers are stealing from them; 2. That the purpose of "government" --…
And when demand collapses?
Who says the US has been so successful? I look around and I do not see success. Of course I do not see superlative failure either; but I do see accelerating deterioration.
The only criterion is whether it makes a good story. Would you watch that, or change the channel?
The capital money has to be spent. But it will not be reallocated to the internal roles/activities that this article suggests, because those things are part CapEx and part OpEx. It will have to go to consultants,…
The purpose of automation is to obscure responsibility.
Well, of course they can. Just look around you.
I (composer, Sibelius notation software on Windows) have been using a landscape 43" 4K next to a portrait 32" 4K for quite a while now. It is the ideal combination for an unusual use case. I found that I had to turn…
"...more direct, more human, and sometimes more playful or fiery...." I rejected the original Macintosh because it smiled at me.
Are you thinking of things like Time Cube? Seriously, anything written 30 years ago could still be written today and would still run. Standards are made by first-movers even if what they move is howling junk. Every…
We adapt without learning.
Should we be comforted that their priorities are as bad as ours?
There is no such thing as intellectual property.
Is anyone free to speak to their family, their teachers, or their employers? Is anyone listening? The whole notion is dishonest.
The suddenness is that of a busker trying to keep up with their audience.
There are a higher proportion here of persons who think scientifically. There is no automatic intersection between that and politics; any intersection must be forced. But when it is forced, it will be found that…
Not unravelling. Refocusing. The peasant ideology will always dominate, until it takes the species down with it.
6000 people are being committed to this project today so that they can be fired day-after-tomorrow.
"made", or "was given"?
All while successive technological discoveries raise the minimum standard of thought: vertiginously, incomprehensibly, unattainably. Something's got to give.
"Society" (i.e. northern European and Anglophone) doesn't want to be improved.
The opacity is the point.
Future historians -- far, far future, if at all -- will place Timothy Dexter and Elon Musk in the same category.
It is no good saying that "...engineers know how to solve distributed trust problems...." Some engineers do, but much of the code (not only AI, but across all industries) is being written by engineers who do not.
The difference between meritocracy and "meritocracy" is that the former is a training function, whose goal is to learn the set of contributors whose contributions can be ignored. In "meritocracy", on the other hand,…
Talk about the emotional illness of the owning and managing classes, taking the form of two paranoid delusions: 1. That all of their employees and customers are stealing from them; 2. That the purpose of "government" --…
And when demand collapses?
Who says the US has been so successful? I look around and I do not see success. Of course I do not see superlative failure either; but I do see accelerating deterioration.
The only criterion is whether it makes a good story. Would you watch that, or change the channel?
The capital money has to be spent. But it will not be reallocated to the internal roles/activities that this article suggests, because those things are part CapEx and part OpEx. It will have to go to consultants,…
The purpose of automation is to obscure responsibility.
Well, of course they can. Just look around you.
I (composer, Sibelius notation software on Windows) have been using a landscape 43" 4K next to a portrait 32" 4K for quite a while now. It is the ideal combination for an unusual use case. I found that I had to turn…
"...more direct, more human, and sometimes more playful or fiery...." I rejected the original Macintosh because it smiled at me.
Are you thinking of things like Time Cube? Seriously, anything written 30 years ago could still be written today and would still run. Standards are made by first-movers even if what they move is howling junk. Every…
We adapt without learning.