[dead]
[flagged]
> only recently have agents started getting Rust code right on the first try This is such a silly thing to say. Either you set the bar so low that "hello world" qualifies or you expect LLMs to be able to reason about…
Ok, but what is the distinction between the two terms?
Universal basic income by itself is just a stick propping up the consumer economy. We need a real welfare state, not the pathetic half-attempt we have today. We must take care of each other.
PCIe expertise will certainly outlive anyone on this forum.
> The benefit being that it formalizes the human as the specifier (which must be done anyway) and the llm as the code writer. The code was always a secondary effect of making software. The pain is in fully specifying…
Such a model likely would not be referred to as "ownership". This is a relatively recent metaphor for memory management that came well after the concepts you mentioned. The fact that such a metaphor is core to rust's…
> Sure, but now I need to be fluent in prompt-lang and the underlying programming language if you want me to be confident in the output (and you probably do, right?) Using a formal language makes the problem space…
I never understood this idea that you should min/max your typing. The editor should serve you, not the other way around. Then again, I'm an emacs user.
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[flagged]
> only recently have agents started getting Rust code right on the first try This is such a silly thing to say. Either you set the bar so low that "hello world" qualifies or you expect LLMs to be able to reason about…
Ok, but what is the distinction between the two terms?
Universal basic income by itself is just a stick propping up the consumer economy. We need a real welfare state, not the pathetic half-attempt we have today. We must take care of each other.
PCIe expertise will certainly outlive anyone on this forum.
> The benefit being that it formalizes the human as the specifier (which must be done anyway) and the llm as the code writer. The code was always a secondary effect of making software. The pain is in fully specifying…
Such a model likely would not be referred to as "ownership". This is a relatively recent metaphor for memory management that came well after the concepts you mentioned. The fact that such a metaphor is core to rust's…
> Sure, but now I need to be fluent in prompt-lang and the underlying programming language if you want me to be confident in the output (and you probably do, right?) Using a formal language makes the problem space…
I never understood this idea that you should min/max your typing. The editor should serve you, not the other way around. Then again, I'm an emacs user.