[dead]
[flagged]
Universal basic income by itself is just a stick propping up the consumer economy. We need a real welfare state, not the pathetic half-attempt we have today. We must take care of each other.
> The benefit being that it formalizes the human as the specifier (which must be done anyway) and the llm as the code writer. The code was always a secondary effect of making software. The pain is in fully specifying…
> Sure, but now I need to be fluent in prompt-lang and the underlying programming language if you want me to be confident in the output (and you probably do, right?) Using a formal language makes the problem space…
I never understood this idea that you should min/max your typing. The editor should serve you, not the other way around. Then again, I'm an emacs user.
Yes, it's exaggeration. Modal editing cannot read your mind.
The benefit is that you can allocate arbitrary computers to compute arbitrary things. As it is now, you have to use kubernetes and it's a comedy. Though perhaps the same in effect, there are dozens of layers of…
Let's not speculate. I'm the first to be skeptical of government but this just makes people skeptical of your words.
> raw coding is now a solved problem Surely this was solved with fortran. What changed? I think most people just don't know what program they want.
I searched for "simple interest" and found nothing. What on earth is this searching? I would not put your name next to this. Edit: I appreciate the quick turnaround. Apologies.
Take the money and never admit to selling this shit. Why would you ever willingly associate your name with this?
Why not just use brass? Seems like a solution in search of a problem.
Plan 9 is just a brand smeared across a codebase, just like every other operating system. > If so, it is unsuitable for being a database. It can run databases, because those can work without transactions. But can't do…
The splatting seems to be video only but I could be wrong. It's only a matter of time until the #1 hit figures out how to make this work
I just assumed they wanted to interface with existing json over http apis rather than write their own code. The sibling of my previous comment addresses that concern.
That's up to you. Why ask me?
In addition to the sibling comment, you might also consider simply not using the APIs or SQL queries to begin with. Many people have entire careers without touching either.
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[dead]
[flagged]
Universal basic income by itself is just a stick propping up the consumer economy. We need a real welfare state, not the pathetic half-attempt we have today. We must take care of each other.
> The benefit being that it formalizes the human as the specifier (which must be done anyway) and the llm as the code writer. The code was always a secondary effect of making software. The pain is in fully specifying…
> Sure, but now I need to be fluent in prompt-lang and the underlying programming language if you want me to be confident in the output (and you probably do, right?) Using a formal language makes the problem space…
I never understood this idea that you should min/max your typing. The editor should serve you, not the other way around. Then again, I'm an emacs user.
Yes, it's exaggeration. Modal editing cannot read your mind.
The benefit is that you can allocate arbitrary computers to compute arbitrary things. As it is now, you have to use kubernetes and it's a comedy. Though perhaps the same in effect, there are dozens of layers of…
Let's not speculate. I'm the first to be skeptical of government but this just makes people skeptical of your words.
> raw coding is now a solved problem Surely this was solved with fortran. What changed? I think most people just don't know what program they want.
I searched for "simple interest" and found nothing. What on earth is this searching? I would not put your name next to this. Edit: I appreciate the quick turnaround. Apologies.
Take the money and never admit to selling this shit. Why would you ever willingly associate your name with this?
Why not just use brass? Seems like a solution in search of a problem.
Plan 9 is just a brand smeared across a codebase, just like every other operating system. > If so, it is unsuitable for being a database. It can run databases, because those can work without transactions. But can't do…
The splatting seems to be video only but I could be wrong. It's only a matter of time until the #1 hit figures out how to make this work
I just assumed they wanted to interface with existing json over http apis rather than write their own code. The sibling of my previous comment addresses that concern.
That's up to you. Why ask me?
In addition to the sibling comment, you might also consider simply not using the APIs or SQL queries to begin with. Many people have entire careers without touching either.