[flagged]
I think there's a middle ground between "attention is obsolete" and "this proves nothing"
What I find funny is that Babbage was already dealing with essentially the same misconception over a century earlier
[dead]
For something explicitly meant to be recovered in a worst-case scenario 10–20 years from now, optimizing for boring, widely available readers seems more valuable than squeezing another 50GB onto each disc
I just do not indertan why is it an issue sorry../
So the mitochondrial part of the "reset" is less like rejuvenating an old population and more like starting from a maternally inherited population that was largely kept out of the metabolic action in the first place
An adult therapy has to rejuvenate the cells you already have, in place, without breaking tissue function or creating cancer. Much less room for error
Embryos are probably the clearest proof that at least some of what we call biological aging is reversible rather than simply accumulated irreversible damage
I think the interesting question then moves one level down: how well do those elasticity assumptions describe the actual H-2B labor markets in the study?
The lottery is what makes this unusually interesting. A lot of immigration/labor studies get stuck on the obvious selection problem: firms that hire immigrant workers are probably different from firms that don't in a…
Search used to feel more like infrastructure: put something useful on the web, link to it, and eventually people could find it
Though weirdly it makes the subdomain result even more interesting: presumably those wikis are rewriting their sitemaps too, yet Google manages to index them normally
The sitemap issues are definitely worth fixing, but I don't think they explain the most interesting part: the same kind of wiki seems to behave very differently depending on whether it's on a fresh root domain or an…
This is what makes me wonder how much additional benefit an explicit carbon signal actually buys you over normal dynamic pricing
Sure, but I don't think the two ideas are really in conflict. A low-carbon grid should absolutely be the end goal, but even a mostly clean grid has hours that are cleaner than others
The harder question is probably whether dynamic pricing changes behavior without mostly becoming a penalty for people who have less flexibility in when they use electricity
Humanoid robotics has been optimizing for the wrong benchmark this whole time. Forget dexterity, we need executive presence.
Funny that we're reached the point where perfectly normal rhetorical habits can trigger the "AI wrote this" alarm... (or not funny, just ironic)
[flagged]
[flagged]
I think there's a middle ground between "attention is obsolete" and "this proves nothing"
What I find funny is that Babbage was already dealing with essentially the same misconception over a century earlier
[dead]
[dead]
For something explicitly meant to be recovered in a worst-case scenario 10–20 years from now, optimizing for boring, widely available readers seems more valuable than squeezing another 50GB onto each disc
I just do not indertan why is it an issue sorry../
So the mitochondrial part of the "reset" is less like rejuvenating an old population and more like starting from a maternally inherited population that was largely kept out of the metabolic action in the first place
An adult therapy has to rejuvenate the cells you already have, in place, without breaking tissue function or creating cancer. Much less room for error
Embryos are probably the clearest proof that at least some of what we call biological aging is reversible rather than simply accumulated irreversible damage
[flagged]
I think the interesting question then moves one level down: how well do those elasticity assumptions describe the actual H-2B labor markets in the study?
[dead]
The lottery is what makes this unusually interesting. A lot of immigration/labor studies get stuck on the obvious selection problem: firms that hire immigrant workers are probably different from firms that don't in a…
Search used to feel more like infrastructure: put something useful on the web, link to it, and eventually people could find it
Though weirdly it makes the subdomain result even more interesting: presumably those wikis are rewriting their sitemaps too, yet Google manages to index them normally
The sitemap issues are definitely worth fixing, but I don't think they explain the most interesting part: the same kind of wiki seems to behave very differently depending on whether it's on a fresh root domain or an…
This is what makes me wonder how much additional benefit an explicit carbon signal actually buys you over normal dynamic pricing
Sure, but I don't think the two ideas are really in conflict. A low-carbon grid should absolutely be the end goal, but even a mostly clean grid has hours that are cleaner than others
The harder question is probably whether dynamic pricing changes behavior without mostly becoming a penalty for people who have less flexibility in when they use electricity
Humanoid robotics has been optimizing for the wrong benchmark this whole time. Forget dexterity, we need executive presence.
Funny that we're reached the point where perfectly normal rhetorical habits can trigger the "AI wrote this" alarm... (or not funny, just ironic)
[dead]
[dead]