Please be more patient :) Replying to posts you didn't read will not help us, definitely.
Just because some people have a different opinion than you, doesn't mean it is due to fallacious reasoning. Ultimately, it seems to come down to rust haters who have a sunken cost fallacy - I spent years writing bad…
But we're not talking about fire codes, we're talking about building codes. The stamp on lumber does not make it less flammable.
This is a huge problem. Javascript has become a blight on the web, and browsers really need to make it easier to manage stopping scripts on background tabs and such.
>It's less confusing when you focus on the 'freedom of the users'. No it isn't. The entire purpose of the GPL is to restrict the freedom of the users. Public domain gives freedom to the users. Everything else adds…
So who are you using then? I don't see anyone that has a cap. Everyone charges you if you go over your allotted bandwidth.
It depends on the item. China is known for low quality goods because companies outsource to China to save money. They are telling the companies in China to make cheap crap. The manufacturers are perfectly capable and…
>They're commercially available At absurd prices though. It isn't just the shipping, small scale farm/market garden stuff is priced ridiculously high.
>but in truth they deal with less knowledge than a subsistence farmer, who has to know a hell of a lot about agronomy. If they had to then they would. Since they do not, obviously they do not have to. Very few farmers…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias
Don't go lumping us in with the alt-right. We're not even right wing.
You just linked to a honing steel that is incorrectly labelled on amazon as a "sharpening steel" (which no, does not exist) by the random vendor who knows nothing about the products they sell. Read the actual item…
>He's already backtracking on ObamaCare, saying he wants to keep parts of it He said that over 6 months ago, that's not backtracking. >unless you campaigned a lot to get more people to the polls in the Dem primary to…
>Because if you're in USNE, you probably felt genuinely ill after hearing the nomination Which is both a foolish assumption and completely off-topic and irrelevant. Even in the NE, millions of people voted for Trump.…
>Uhm, well, because I'm having a conversation about cultural differences between the midwest and the north-east The subject is entirely irrelevant. You just bring it up to virtue signal, despite the fact that even in…
I know it is in the guidelines. I am saying that I disagree with that guideline as it does not accomplish the goal the guidelines are intended to accomplish.
It does add to the comment. It hopefully encourages people to actually read the article. People can not contribute to a discussion constructively if they do not read the subject of the discussion.
I don't think it is either. But the post is under the misconception that twitter should be saved because it offers a free speech alternative to the other social media outlets.
Twitter is 100% opposed to free speech, and have stated policy that they censor views they do not like. There is nothing there to save for the sake of free speech. If you want some form of "social media" with free…
Except they are more likely to give up in other fields too. Even fields with lots of women in them. So no, your assumption is not backed by basic evidence.
>All that is evidence of is that women give up more often than men Yes, that's the point. >That doesn't provide any evidence that it's because men's value is tied to achievement. Indeed, that's what we're offering a…
I am sure that assuming their behavior does not follow the obvious explanation because you simply dislike the obvious explanation is silly.
That makes absolutely no sense. By definition, giving up is failure. So the options are "100% chance of failure" vs "less than 100% chance of failure", and you think they are more likely to pick "100% chance of failure"…
So, you have no evidence that this "problem" is actually a problem. You have no evidence that your solution to this "problem" actually solves it. And in fact, the only evidence you present indicates that the thing you…
It could be much worse. Simply making random changes and hoping it is an improvement rather than making things worse is not sensible.
Please be more patient :) Replying to posts you didn't read will not help us, definitely.
Just because some people have a different opinion than you, doesn't mean it is due to fallacious reasoning. Ultimately, it seems to come down to rust haters who have a sunken cost fallacy - I spent years writing bad…
But we're not talking about fire codes, we're talking about building codes. The stamp on lumber does not make it less flammable.
This is a huge problem. Javascript has become a blight on the web, and browsers really need to make it easier to manage stopping scripts on background tabs and such.
>It's less confusing when you focus on the 'freedom of the users'. No it isn't. The entire purpose of the GPL is to restrict the freedom of the users. Public domain gives freedom to the users. Everything else adds…
So who are you using then? I don't see anyone that has a cap. Everyone charges you if you go over your allotted bandwidth.
It depends on the item. China is known for low quality goods because companies outsource to China to save money. They are telling the companies in China to make cheap crap. The manufacturers are perfectly capable and…
>They're commercially available At absurd prices though. It isn't just the shipping, small scale farm/market garden stuff is priced ridiculously high.
>but in truth they deal with less knowledge than a subsistence farmer, who has to know a hell of a lot about agronomy. If they had to then they would. Since they do not, obviously they do not have to. Very few farmers…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias
Don't go lumping us in with the alt-right. We're not even right wing.
You just linked to a honing steel that is incorrectly labelled on amazon as a "sharpening steel" (which no, does not exist) by the random vendor who knows nothing about the products they sell. Read the actual item…
>He's already backtracking on ObamaCare, saying he wants to keep parts of it He said that over 6 months ago, that's not backtracking. >unless you campaigned a lot to get more people to the polls in the Dem primary to…
>Because if you're in USNE, you probably felt genuinely ill after hearing the nomination Which is both a foolish assumption and completely off-topic and irrelevant. Even in the NE, millions of people voted for Trump.…
>Uhm, well, because I'm having a conversation about cultural differences between the midwest and the north-east The subject is entirely irrelevant. You just bring it up to virtue signal, despite the fact that even in…
I know it is in the guidelines. I am saying that I disagree with that guideline as it does not accomplish the goal the guidelines are intended to accomplish.
It does add to the comment. It hopefully encourages people to actually read the article. People can not contribute to a discussion constructively if they do not read the subject of the discussion.
I don't think it is either. But the post is under the misconception that twitter should be saved because it offers a free speech alternative to the other social media outlets.
Twitter is 100% opposed to free speech, and have stated policy that they censor views they do not like. There is nothing there to save for the sake of free speech. If you want some form of "social media" with free…
Except they are more likely to give up in other fields too. Even fields with lots of women in them. So no, your assumption is not backed by basic evidence.
>All that is evidence of is that women give up more often than men Yes, that's the point. >That doesn't provide any evidence that it's because men's value is tied to achievement. Indeed, that's what we're offering a…
I am sure that assuming their behavior does not follow the obvious explanation because you simply dislike the obvious explanation is silly.
That makes absolutely no sense. By definition, giving up is failure. So the options are "100% chance of failure" vs "less than 100% chance of failure", and you think they are more likely to pick "100% chance of failure"…
So, you have no evidence that this "problem" is actually a problem. You have no evidence that your solution to this "problem" actually solves it. And in fact, the only evidence you present indicates that the thing you…
It could be much worse. Simply making random changes and hoping it is an improvement rather than making things worse is not sensible.