The complexity is also what allows loopholes to exist for rich people.
Only if you define "good life" as having a big house with a big yard.
Even if the money is lit on fire, the reduction in cars entering the city will be a huge benefit.
There is a reason, but it is not geology. https://www.6sqft.com/the-bedrock-myth-the-evolution-of-the-...
Skyscrapers are very expensive to build. What would actually help is allowing ~10 story buildings everywhere in the five boroughs with a fast and simple permitting process.
Even if it could run forever, just keeping it running isn't good enough. If you never make any improvements, your users are going to go to a different service that does.
Why would the casino need that, when they can have anybody who wins arrested?
> If Americans want room to drive and get places and park A whole lot of Americans don't want that. You can tell by how much more expensive it is to live in walkable city centers than in suburbs.
You can learn everything most devs need to know about Kafka in a couple hours. I can't imagine why companies would ever hire based on current knowledge rather than problem solving skills and ability to learn.
Not sure how large you mean, but for <=3 kids: walking, metro, bus, cargo bike, taxi. I'm in NYC, and I'll take a 10 minute walk to the supermarket with my kids over a 10 minute drive any day.
I don't think that's common. Our pediatrician, who is part of a US major hospital, never mentioned this and basically said "introduce new foods on days without much going on in case you need to go to the ER."
A whole lot of people who can afford to live anywhere in the world and choose to raise their kids in NYC disagree with you.
That basically never happens with strangers on the street. If you're worried about that, pay more attention to teachers ("nearly 9.6% of students are targets of educator sexual misconduct") and your partner ("of the…
Business owners are notoriously terrible at understanding how street usage affects their business. https://www.wired.com/story/the-battle-over-bike-lanes-needs...
> I’m also an Urbanism nerd and don’t want to see cities revert to the 70s-era trend, which is clearly and noticeably happening, destroying decades of progress on livability. There's more demand than ever before to live…
Really hoping this kind of tech to ends up in window AC+heat units soon for those of us in apartments.
I don't know details about Germany, but you can't just look at national population trends. In the US for example, the problem is made worse by a trend of people moving from rural areas into cities. And re the "huge…
> our bylaws are based on the US Constitution The same constitution that consistently puts a the party that gets fewer votes into power? If I were to every start a business, that's the last place I'd look for…
As it turns out, the best villages have neither lawns nor garages.
> There are a plethora of totally valid reasons why people would be opposed to endless urban sprawl Density is literally the opposite of sprawl.
> There seems to be a general lack of political will for big projects in the west. We don't need big projects. If popular US cities like Seattle and San Francisco simply allowed people to build 5-story apartment…
> Because today houses are not for living in. They are investments. The only reason homes can be considered investments is that governments limit supply so much that prices are forced to increase.
The people who vote in local primaries and show up to community meetings are older and wealthier than their neighbors and don't want to see anything change. Here's a book about it:…
Can't tell whether you're being sarcastic. The world you describe sounds disgusting, and NYC is more popular than ever in our new WFH world.
Same in NYC which has been creating ~3x more jobs than homes in recent decades.
The complexity is also what allows loopholes to exist for rich people.
Only if you define "good life" as having a big house with a big yard.
Even if the money is lit on fire, the reduction in cars entering the city will be a huge benefit.
There is a reason, but it is not geology. https://www.6sqft.com/the-bedrock-myth-the-evolution-of-the-...
Skyscrapers are very expensive to build. What would actually help is allowing ~10 story buildings everywhere in the five boroughs with a fast and simple permitting process.
Even if it could run forever, just keeping it running isn't good enough. If you never make any improvements, your users are going to go to a different service that does.
Why would the casino need that, when they can have anybody who wins arrested?
> If Americans want room to drive and get places and park A whole lot of Americans don't want that. You can tell by how much more expensive it is to live in walkable city centers than in suburbs.
You can learn everything most devs need to know about Kafka in a couple hours. I can't imagine why companies would ever hire based on current knowledge rather than problem solving skills and ability to learn.
Not sure how large you mean, but for <=3 kids: walking, metro, bus, cargo bike, taxi. I'm in NYC, and I'll take a 10 minute walk to the supermarket with my kids over a 10 minute drive any day.
I don't think that's common. Our pediatrician, who is part of a US major hospital, never mentioned this and basically said "introduce new foods on days without much going on in case you need to go to the ER."
A whole lot of people who can afford to live anywhere in the world and choose to raise their kids in NYC disagree with you.
That basically never happens with strangers on the street. If you're worried about that, pay more attention to teachers ("nearly 9.6% of students are targets of educator sexual misconduct") and your partner ("of the…
Business owners are notoriously terrible at understanding how street usage affects their business. https://www.wired.com/story/the-battle-over-bike-lanes-needs...
> I’m also an Urbanism nerd and don’t want to see cities revert to the 70s-era trend, which is clearly and noticeably happening, destroying decades of progress on livability. There's more demand than ever before to live…
Really hoping this kind of tech to ends up in window AC+heat units soon for those of us in apartments.
I don't know details about Germany, but you can't just look at national population trends. In the US for example, the problem is made worse by a trend of people moving from rural areas into cities. And re the "huge…
> our bylaws are based on the US Constitution The same constitution that consistently puts a the party that gets fewer votes into power? If I were to every start a business, that's the last place I'd look for…
As it turns out, the best villages have neither lawns nor garages.
> There are a plethora of totally valid reasons why people would be opposed to endless urban sprawl Density is literally the opposite of sprawl.
> There seems to be a general lack of political will for big projects in the west. We don't need big projects. If popular US cities like Seattle and San Francisco simply allowed people to build 5-story apartment…
> Because today houses are not for living in. They are investments. The only reason homes can be considered investments is that governments limit supply so much that prices are forced to increase.
The people who vote in local primaries and show up to community meetings are older and wealthier than their neighbors and don't want to see anything change. Here's a book about it:…
Can't tell whether you're being sarcastic. The world you describe sounds disgusting, and NYC is more popular than ever in our new WFH world.
Same in NYC which has been creating ~3x more jobs than homes in recent decades.