Your going to have to qualify hard. It sounds like your saying hard == percentage of it that is digested.
Helps people find parties and get laid. Or do you want a less blunt description?
Travel to moon.
porno accompaniments.
You are trolling. Clearly you are just trying to get a rise. Regardless, my response: you think average would be a better measure I never said that and no I don't. given PG's track record Blind acceptance of whatever…
Do it per page: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=165938 There are a number of simple vulnerabilities but I've yet to see one that cannot be trivially protected against.
Yes, I've come to realize that investors who spend the majority of the time asking me about the legality of my startup really don't have any experience with, or understanding of these types of startups.
Wishing and ignoring amounts to nothing.
Heavily skewed voting can be WORSE than having no information at all. Considering that 95% of the commenting here is disagreement, THAT'S a no-brainer.
You fail at statistical analysis.
This is easy to protect against. Just obscure pg's real name from a portion of the YC userbase. This is really an extremely easy test to get right if we think for a minute.
So everyone is a clone.
Incorrect. He discovered that other bloggers have been providing a false view of startup landscape.
Great point. This has always stuck out as an incredible demonstration of the failure of online tech journalism. I'm surprised that more have not written about this.
That's what I assumed what they were going for. Actually, I fully support this approach.
It's a bit late to say that they all will fail... I could say that for the majority of the time, face to face communications are what's failing people. It's inefficient and limiting for so many purposes. There are times…
YC is a clone of Google's SOC project that occurred the prior summer. Taking on multiple projects simultaneously, providing about 5k, accepting applications, three month timeline, having frequent meetings between people…
Your going to have to qualify hard. It sounds like your saying hard == percentage of it that is digested.
Helps people find parties and get laid. Or do you want a less blunt description?
Travel to moon.
porno accompaniments.
You are trolling. Clearly you are just trying to get a rise. Regardless, my response: you think average would be a better measure I never said that and no I don't. given PG's track record Blind acceptance of whatever…
Do it per page: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=165938 There are a number of simple vulnerabilities but I've yet to see one that cannot be trivially protected against.
Yes, I've come to realize that investors who spend the majority of the time asking me about the legality of my startup really don't have any experience with, or understanding of these types of startups.
Wishing and ignoring amounts to nothing.
Heavily skewed voting can be WORSE than having no information at all. Considering that 95% of the commenting here is disagreement, THAT'S a no-brainer.
You fail at statistical analysis.
This is easy to protect against. Just obscure pg's real name from a portion of the YC userbase. This is really an extremely easy test to get right if we think for a minute.
So everyone is a clone.
Incorrect. He discovered that other bloggers have been providing a false view of startup landscape.
Great point. This has always stuck out as an incredible demonstration of the failure of online tech journalism. I'm surprised that more have not written about this.
That's what I assumed what they were going for. Actually, I fully support this approach.
It's a bit late to say that they all will fail... I could say that for the majority of the time, face to face communications are what's failing people. It's inefficient and limiting for so many purposes. There are times…
YC is a clone of Google's SOC project that occurred the prior summer. Taking on multiple projects simultaneously, providing about 5k, accepting applications, three month timeline, having frequent meetings between people…