Bad number of significant figures used: his correlation coefficient's 95% confidence interval is 0.51 to 0.89, so he should only be using 1 or 2 significant figures.
'Well it works for ME' apologism detected.
i.e. nothing substantial in the past half-decade
u mad?
You're not missing anything.
You know, around these parts we just say 'not hacker news.'
Bad number of significant figures used: his correlation coefficient's 95% confidence interval is 0.51 to 0.89, so he should only be using 1 or 2 significant figures.
'Well it works for ME' apologism detected.
i.e. nothing substantial in the past half-decade
u mad?
You're not missing anything.
You know, around these parts we just say 'not hacker news.'