Look at the last post on lesswrong.com, they seem to agree :)
An authoritative source would need to cover all possible contexts (not to mention the problem of actually being right), which would make it infinite in length....
This is blogspam and also very light on information. Would not read again.
Look at the last post on lesswrong.com, they seem to agree :)
An authoritative source would need to cover all possible contexts (not to mention the problem of actually being right), which would make it infinite in length....
This is blogspam and also very light on information. Would not read again.