Yes, but what was the task that they were working on? This tells nothing. That’s the “how” we’re wondering about.
Spoken like a true engineer. Law is very inconsistent and illogical. Otherwise we’d have “Law Engineers” instead of Lawyers.
Ah okay yeah that makes sense Was missing the “make it more difficult for a thief to find the AirTag and remove it” part. Cheers!
Call me dumb I still don’t understand what exact problem these clowns were trying to solve
For anyone who’s concerned about the whole “oh we need to check the age of the user” Here’s a simple solution: the ad industry is welcome to not profile its users. Don’t get distracted though: > Furthermore, the…
I’m either blind or I can’t edit my original post. I love it how people completely got tilted as soon as I dare touch the sacred cow that is LBTQ+ and completely fucking missed the main point I was trying to articulate:…
No they don’t. If they do - then they equally have a responsibility to block LBTQ+ content. Social platforms must remain neutral carriers, not arbiters of truth and morality. Unless it’s governed by a democratic…
Information doesn’t distribute equally
Nice now go build some fucking nuclear power stations.
Okay I think this is one of those situations where we should harness our collective autism and prevent the gTLD from going through. As others have pointed out there seems to be a mechanism for objecting. Just purely…
The ‘ol letter of the law vs spirit of the law. The law permits the behaviour, don’t like it? Change it.
Thank you
Time for a new wife then
And nuclear power for base load, batteries and solar is not enough.
Mmmmmm more slop!
[flagged]
I might be dumb, can someone explain to me how these are supposed to be useful? What if I want to tackle one of these myself, manually? I expand the sections and it’s all full of prompt slop
> This time is the first time we've automated higher level reasoning. That’s very generous of you to call it that way. It’s a parody at best.
Git gud. Don’t mix derived data from recorded data. Record data with the information available, then normalise for processing. Don’t be a monkey.
Good, can’t wait to see what fertiliser and heating costs will be. All it took was destruction of global energy markets and supplies. Let’s celebrate!
That’s all well and good, but can we get something other than a yet another fucking “an box” car with “slightly different headlights”?
Waiting for people to realise that this is not a recent Facebook specific development.
Two words: base load And no you’re not solving it with a buffer (batteries or any kind of other energy storage for that matter)
Pardon my French, but why the flying fuck did you even think that giving an LLM write access to your email is remotely in the proximity of a good idea?
Yes, but what was the task that they were working on? This tells nothing. That’s the “how” we’re wondering about.
Spoken like a true engineer. Law is very inconsistent and illogical. Otherwise we’d have “Law Engineers” instead of Lawyers.
Ah okay yeah that makes sense Was missing the “make it more difficult for a thief to find the AirTag and remove it” part. Cheers!
Call me dumb I still don’t understand what exact problem these clowns were trying to solve
For anyone who’s concerned about the whole “oh we need to check the age of the user” Here’s a simple solution: the ad industry is welcome to not profile its users. Don’t get distracted though: > Furthermore, the…
I’m either blind or I can’t edit my original post. I love it how people completely got tilted as soon as I dare touch the sacred cow that is LBTQ+ and completely fucking missed the main point I was trying to articulate:…
No they don’t. If they do - then they equally have a responsibility to block LBTQ+ content. Social platforms must remain neutral carriers, not arbiters of truth and morality. Unless it’s governed by a democratic…
Information doesn’t distribute equally
Nice now go build some fucking nuclear power stations.
Okay I think this is one of those situations where we should harness our collective autism and prevent the gTLD from going through. As others have pointed out there seems to be a mechanism for objecting. Just purely…
The ‘ol letter of the law vs spirit of the law. The law permits the behaviour, don’t like it? Change it.
Thank you
Time for a new wife then
And nuclear power for base load, batteries and solar is not enough.
Mmmmmm more slop!
[flagged]
I might be dumb, can someone explain to me how these are supposed to be useful? What if I want to tackle one of these myself, manually? I expand the sections and it’s all full of prompt slop
> This time is the first time we've automated higher level reasoning. That’s very generous of you to call it that way. It’s a parody at best.
Git gud. Don’t mix derived data from recorded data. Record data with the information available, then normalise for processing. Don’t be a monkey.
Good, can’t wait to see what fertiliser and heating costs will be. All it took was destruction of global energy markets and supplies. Let’s celebrate!
That’s all well and good, but can we get something other than a yet another fucking “an box” car with “slightly different headlights”?
Waiting for people to realise that this is not a recent Facebook specific development.
[flagged]
Two words: base load And no you’re not solving it with a buffer (batteries or any kind of other energy storage for that matter)
Pardon my French, but why the flying fuck did you even think that giving an LLM write access to your email is remotely in the proximity of a good idea?