If, as a society, we wanted to publicly shame every major corporation when a violation of this magnitude occured then each headline would be up for a minute or two. There is limited public attention. Wasting it on such…
Disagree. 1.5 sq miles of forest is miniscule. Shouldn't even be local news where it happened.
I think the only thing your downvotes say is that many people disagree with your opinion.
Until it gets good enough that you can't tell the difference. It will climb out of the uncanny valley eventually.
Exactly. Also, for practical purposes, an AI's capability to meet or exceed human performance is a very important benchmark. It makes the decision between using AI vs paying a human creator very easy.
A remarkably individualistic trend. You no longer need to rely on the central authority for your electric utility.
I hope it's more like discovering islands of information which we can use as footholds to connect the dots between them.
It matters from the perspective of tech dependency. If a medium/small country deemed it a threat to rely on US/China for AI capabilities, they can get 95% of the utility by banning all American and Chinese models and…
Right. My point with that comment was to mirror fezoracer's comment that "you are not entitled to someone else's money and people aren't required to pay for something they can make themselves" Both are strawman…
Of course you're allowed to criticize. Likewise, others are free to criticize your criticism. My point is it's silly to be upset about others charging for products that are easily vibe coded. If it's that easy to make,…
Yes it is. I can go to the grocery store and buy one in 10 minutes from where I am now. And it would cost me very little to do so. That's the analogous equivalent of spending the tokens to use AI to make this project.…
It's not just their refusal to pay for something that's low-effort. It's the fact that they are criticizing the creator for charging anyone at all. You're not entitled to dictate what someone else charges for their…
It is surely much easier to replace a potato than to recreate this. Yet we still pay for potatoes.
What makes you think that computers will be unable to pick relevant questions for humans? Surely an AI could consider the human's needs, wants, and interests, and then provide a likely candidate for a good question.
This is the goal of some, but very few overall, government regulations. Not even close to "all".
This only happens in very mature industries. AI is obviously moving extremely quickly with lots of new entrants and moving parts. That's why all the model providers are losing money fighting for market share.
Or, cynically, for creators who pay an extra fee.
They should just do it on the subset with the most views.
Yes? Isn't that what humans do when teaching each other math? I don't see why, however any human prefers to teach/learn math, LLMs can't do that too.
What is the reason that we won't eventually be able to ask AI to simplify the lean proof, or make it more readable to humans? Or to read the swarm communication logs and summarize the process by which they arrived at…
The cost to take a picture today and keep it on your phone is not more expensive than it was when you had to get them developed in a darkroom. The cost to watch a movie today through streaming is not more than it was…
But, as a whole, the entire population's pay goes a lot farther since no one has to pay drivers to drive them around anymore. Living standards would be a lot worse today if we still had to pick crops in the field by…
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/research 1 : studious inquiry or examination especially : investigation or experimentation aimed at the discovery and interpretation of facts, revision of accepted theories or…
Who determines the objective of mathematics research? All mathematics researchers in the whole world have agreed upon that objective apparently?
Right. Imagine if some human mathmetician released what OpenAI did with all the caveats and warnings about possible mistakes. It would be ridiculous for anyone to say "hey man you really shouldn't even have posted these…
If, as a society, we wanted to publicly shame every major corporation when a violation of this magnitude occured then each headline would be up for a minute or two. There is limited public attention. Wasting it on such…
Disagree. 1.5 sq miles of forest is miniscule. Shouldn't even be local news where it happened.
I think the only thing your downvotes say is that many people disagree with your opinion.
Until it gets good enough that you can't tell the difference. It will climb out of the uncanny valley eventually.
Exactly. Also, for practical purposes, an AI's capability to meet or exceed human performance is a very important benchmark. It makes the decision between using AI vs paying a human creator very easy.
A remarkably individualistic trend. You no longer need to rely on the central authority for your electric utility.
I hope it's more like discovering islands of information which we can use as footholds to connect the dots between them.
It matters from the perspective of tech dependency. If a medium/small country deemed it a threat to rely on US/China for AI capabilities, they can get 95% of the utility by banning all American and Chinese models and…
Right. My point with that comment was to mirror fezoracer's comment that "you are not entitled to someone else's money and people aren't required to pay for something they can make themselves" Both are strawman…
Of course you're allowed to criticize. Likewise, others are free to criticize your criticism. My point is it's silly to be upset about others charging for products that are easily vibe coded. If it's that easy to make,…
Yes it is. I can go to the grocery store and buy one in 10 minutes from where I am now. And it would cost me very little to do so. That's the analogous equivalent of spending the tokens to use AI to make this project.…
It's not just their refusal to pay for something that's low-effort. It's the fact that they are criticizing the creator for charging anyone at all. You're not entitled to dictate what someone else charges for their…
It is surely much easier to replace a potato than to recreate this. Yet we still pay for potatoes.
What makes you think that computers will be unable to pick relevant questions for humans? Surely an AI could consider the human's needs, wants, and interests, and then provide a likely candidate for a good question.
This is the goal of some, but very few overall, government regulations. Not even close to "all".
This only happens in very mature industries. AI is obviously moving extremely quickly with lots of new entrants and moving parts. That's why all the model providers are losing money fighting for market share.
Or, cynically, for creators who pay an extra fee.
They should just do it on the subset with the most views.
Yes? Isn't that what humans do when teaching each other math? I don't see why, however any human prefers to teach/learn math, LLMs can't do that too.
What is the reason that we won't eventually be able to ask AI to simplify the lean proof, or make it more readable to humans? Or to read the swarm communication logs and summarize the process by which they arrived at…
The cost to take a picture today and keep it on your phone is not more expensive than it was when you had to get them developed in a darkroom. The cost to watch a movie today through streaming is not more than it was…
But, as a whole, the entire population's pay goes a lot farther since no one has to pay drivers to drive them around anymore. Living standards would be a lot worse today if we still had to pick crops in the field by…
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/research 1 : studious inquiry or examination especially : investigation or experimentation aimed at the discovery and interpretation of facts, revision of accepted theories or…
Who determines the objective of mathematics research? All mathematics researchers in the whole world have agreed upon that objective apparently?
Right. Imagine if some human mathmetician released what OpenAI did with all the caveats and warnings about possible mistakes. It would be ridiculous for anyone to say "hey man you really shouldn't even have posted these…