It's not a terrible argument. To put it differently, the value to the end user is not a direct function of the degree of openness, but the utility of the degree of openness. The narrative of Sophie measures this utility.
Numbers of committers sampled per language might be helpful in identifying potential bias.
This is ending up on marketwatch.com only after a JS redirect from the ad landing page. http://www.goldfellow.com/currentmarketwatchlink/
It also pains me to see how the web has forced us back a decade in terms of what's an impressive UI feat. When your hands are tied, undoing a knot becomes notable.
But the idea that it’s doing something better, new or innovative is largely PR and faffery. Facebook is incredibly innovative at growing its user base. No other social network has concentrated on and succeeded at this…
This feels like mostly a PR piece to me. And reports seem conflicting. Google doesn't seem to say what they did beyond that they "developed an algorithmic solution which detects the merchant from the Times article along…
What if my ideas are smaller parts of different things (i.e. a cycle, which can not be in a tree)? Maybe I'm thinking about it the wrong way.
I can confirm that there were foxit references in pre-beta source code edit: i think this was the reference i was thinking of, is it for this feature, or is it unrelated?…
It's not a terrible argument. To put it differently, the value to the end user is not a direct function of the degree of openness, but the utility of the degree of openness. The narrative of Sophie measures this utility.
Numbers of committers sampled per language might be helpful in identifying potential bias.
This is ending up on marketwatch.com only after a JS redirect from the ad landing page. http://www.goldfellow.com/currentmarketwatchlink/
It also pains me to see how the web has forced us back a decade in terms of what's an impressive UI feat. When your hands are tied, undoing a knot becomes notable.
But the idea that it’s doing something better, new or innovative is largely PR and faffery. Facebook is incredibly innovative at growing its user base. No other social network has concentrated on and succeeded at this…
This feels like mostly a PR piece to me. And reports seem conflicting. Google doesn't seem to say what they did beyond that they "developed an algorithmic solution which detects the merchant from the Times article along…
What if my ideas are smaller parts of different things (i.e. a cycle, which can not be in a tree)? Maybe I'm thinking about it the wrong way.
I can confirm that there were foxit references in pre-beta source code edit: i think this was the reference i was thinking of, is it for this feature, or is it unrelated?…