Your computer. It hacks your computer to find out the state.
http://www.ismycomputeron.com
What laptop models were you guys using?
Ease of reading is a practical feature not a beautiful one. If you think practicality is beautiful well great.
Go is an ugly language. Practical but ugly.
> A lot of odd Nix hate in here, or at least extreme dislike. I hate this expression. I'm a nix user. But if you can't understand why people dislike it... you're the one that's odd and out of touch. If you want people…
Theoretically if the pesticide is below a certain threshold I should be fine. However if I mix thousands of dangerous chemicals together while keeping each portion below the danger threshold until I have a cup of this…
I read it. Science is not logic in the same way that a brick building is not a brick. Your description is inconsistent. You differentiate logical theories and scientific theories as different yet you call logic the…
>Not going to address your weird attempt at wordplay There's absolutely zero need to be rude. There is no "wierd" word play here just misunderstandings and impoliteness by you. >Also, axiom can be just a rule in a…
>This is factually false. Probability is embeddable into predicate logic, but predicate logic is not embeddable into (Bayesian) probability. This is actually an open problem (how to define a probability theory that is…
Hard to say which came first. Probability can be defined in terms of axioms and classical logic just read any probability book. Classical logic can also be defined in terms of probability by setting all causal relations…
No. You are both wrong. Logic is one of the fundamental axioms of the universe. We assume logic is true and consistently applies everywhere throughout the universe. This "rewriting expressions" thing is just a symbolic…
It's more than just a different way of thinking. There's an intuition gap caused by human bias. We bias towards one way of thinking and moving out of that bias is extremely hard.
> A dedicated ticket-churner might be the most efficient way to churn tickets. But why are you so sure that the ticket stream amounts to the best long-term future for the software and its customers? Because a ticket…
Agreed. I'm not fetishizing scalability. I am saying that it is an inevitability. If you can avoid it great, but if you continue growing. You must face it.
*would've agreed
>Claiming that his approach was “not scalable” and that yours is “flexible” sounds naive and conceited to me. Insulting people for a differing opinion that is introduced neutrally is not a conductive way to…
You're thinking along the lines of the dimension of distribution. Yes in terms of distribution, software scales because it can be copied. However there are many other dimensions of scalability to consider. Examine the…
Consider the fact that when complexity of the system rises to a point where no human can comprehend it, the project must lean more and more on specialization rather than a bunch of jack of all trades ownership type…
This type of philosophy is good but not scalable or efficient. Scalability and efficiency requires well defined specialized roles. Additionally the more specialized and "stupid" each compartmentalized role is... the…
>This means, and I assume, we can also base all of our equations on say "energy is not conserved and always increase by 1 Joule", though the physics equations might be much more complex. We can but this won't match with…
>Ah screw it I can’t finish this. I don’t know how to translate the steps without mutable state. I can either lose the ordering or I can say “then mix in the bananas,” thus modifying the existing state. Anyone want to…
>Convention to me would mean something that has been accepted just because it’s always been done that way and people didn’t really bother to question why. You're wrong. The Thermodynamic laws are sort of axiomatic,…
Yeah you're right, but you do get my point. I should write, causation ALWAYS IMPLIES correlation.
If two things have a causative connection they ALWAYS have a correlation as well. If two things have a correlative connection they don't always have a causative connection as well. I never repurposed the word equal. But…
Your computer. It hacks your computer to find out the state.
http://www.ismycomputeron.com
What laptop models were you guys using?
Ease of reading is a practical feature not a beautiful one. If you think practicality is beautiful well great.
Go is an ugly language. Practical but ugly.
> A lot of odd Nix hate in here, or at least extreme dislike. I hate this expression. I'm a nix user. But if you can't understand why people dislike it... you're the one that's odd and out of touch. If you want people…
Theoretically if the pesticide is below a certain threshold I should be fine. However if I mix thousands of dangerous chemicals together while keeping each portion below the danger threshold until I have a cup of this…
I read it. Science is not logic in the same way that a brick building is not a brick. Your description is inconsistent. You differentiate logical theories and scientific theories as different yet you call logic the…
>Not going to address your weird attempt at wordplay There's absolutely zero need to be rude. There is no "wierd" word play here just misunderstandings and impoliteness by you. >Also, axiom can be just a rule in a…
>This is factually false. Probability is embeddable into predicate logic, but predicate logic is not embeddable into (Bayesian) probability. This is actually an open problem (how to define a probability theory that is…
Hard to say which came first. Probability can be defined in terms of axioms and classical logic just read any probability book. Classical logic can also be defined in terms of probability by setting all causal relations…
No. You are both wrong. Logic is one of the fundamental axioms of the universe. We assume logic is true and consistently applies everywhere throughout the universe. This "rewriting expressions" thing is just a symbolic…
It's more than just a different way of thinking. There's an intuition gap caused by human bias. We bias towards one way of thinking and moving out of that bias is extremely hard.
> A dedicated ticket-churner might be the most efficient way to churn tickets. But why are you so sure that the ticket stream amounts to the best long-term future for the software and its customers? Because a ticket…
Agreed. I'm not fetishizing scalability. I am saying that it is an inevitability. If you can avoid it great, but if you continue growing. You must face it.
*would've agreed
>Claiming that his approach was “not scalable” and that yours is “flexible” sounds naive and conceited to me. Insulting people for a differing opinion that is introduced neutrally is not a conductive way to…
You're thinking along the lines of the dimension of distribution. Yes in terms of distribution, software scales because it can be copied. However there are many other dimensions of scalability to consider. Examine the…
Consider the fact that when complexity of the system rises to a point where no human can comprehend it, the project must lean more and more on specialization rather than a bunch of jack of all trades ownership type…
This type of philosophy is good but not scalable or efficient. Scalability and efficiency requires well defined specialized roles. Additionally the more specialized and "stupid" each compartmentalized role is... the…
>This means, and I assume, we can also base all of our equations on say "energy is not conserved and always increase by 1 Joule", though the physics equations might be much more complex. We can but this won't match with…
>Ah screw it I can’t finish this. I don’t know how to translate the steps without mutable state. I can either lose the ordering or I can say “then mix in the bananas,” thus modifying the existing state. Anyone want to…
>Convention to me would mean something that has been accepted just because it’s always been done that way and people didn’t really bother to question why. You're wrong. The Thermodynamic laws are sort of axiomatic,…
Yeah you're right, but you do get my point. I should write, causation ALWAYS IMPLIES correlation.
If two things have a causative connection they ALWAYS have a correlation as well. If two things have a correlative connection they don't always have a causative connection as well. I never repurposed the word equal. But…