>I’m not convinced that most apps will adapt well to the Duo seems like the crux of the matter right there.
Reminds me of a couple German who walked/hitchhiked across the globe and made a movie of while doing so: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weit._Die_Geschichte_von_einem... They get a baby in the middle of it but keep going…
radioactive molecules were probably born in a star... a big hunk of dirt hurling through space hardly creates any energy when compared to a star. We CONSUME...
What do you mean it doesnt scale as well?? It scales much better! It's super complex to extract mechanical work out of exploding pistons, if i need more energy with solar I just make bigger panels (or wait for some more…
hell yea! As a text only internet aficionado this thought makes me happy :-)
thank you for the clarification! Turns out I still have a few things to learn.
For some reason I doubt Max Planck wrote or said this after his death (1947). The person i meant (maybe it was Kuhn). Either way I think it is too harsh, and many of the scientists I know strive to minimize bias as much…
I am not a computer scientist so my understanding is "incomplete". I thought it stood for polynomial and non-polynomial time. But i do mix them up here and there. What i have read time and time again is that: If P≠NP…
thanks for the quote. Reading through it is clear that my understanding of P=NP is not complete enough. I would have thought n*M is precisely not polynomial but exponential time.
yea thats the name that was evading me, methinks.
From my experience in research this was already the case 15 years ago (and from older peers, way before). Science has always has "in-groups". I forget the name of some philosopher in the 50's who was the opinion science…
I believe this stems from an incomplete understanding of the problem space on my part (excuse the multiple puns); but, I am skeptical Knuth really said P=NP. There are so many mathemtical examples of equations that…
Leopold Aschenbrenner tried this and got eaten by the wolves as far as I can tell...
I have tried it in a French restaurant and it was delicious. Just don't think about how cute it would have been to cuddle instead. :-(
How is that an example of burying the lead? (I presume lede is the correct spelling, but burying lead for others to find in their drinking water amuses me.) EDIT: saw the picture and yes. That certainly was catchy, but…
Or the productivity gains, albeit substantial, are not as earth shattering as the llm providers would have you believe. As with any new technology adoption is a laggard. The internet "existed" in the late 80's, early…
Very interesting. LLMs at the state today certainly do feel like a Cambrian explosion on software with more code is being written/generated than ever. Throughout my career it felt like solving one problem opened the…
Being interested is also a lot more easy than to be interesting. The latter really depends on the eye of the beholder. Whereas I make it a game to find out what is interesting about the person across from me. Sometimes…
I like your list of "challenges" but have a personal issue with two of them: 1. "improve uniteds' plane shedule" -> the word "improve" does a lot of heavy lifting there.. 2. Turing test for me is solved: "AI expert" is…
I completely agree with everything you say here. I felt the critique in the article was way more strawman falacy than everything else. I use(d) git much more locally, and would never run into this problem because I…
lul what? As a linux fanboy who "speaks unix" (presumably, do I? not sure...). I find it humorous that we have gone full circle. The newest tech shit is recommending I learn almost 50 year old technology? Time for me to…
these days to me a device is bricked if I need to spend +1h recovering it. Happy linux user though through and through.
certainly! There are pro's and con's to fire still today. Us fireless plebs prefer a life much closer to nature, eating our meat raw and bathing in the mud.
I think bill gates summarized it pretty well in a recent letter [1]. There are pro's and con's to every new technology. Learning can be greatly accelerated with the use of llm's but you have to use them the right way.…
slop confirmed.
>I’m not convinced that most apps will adapt well to the Duo seems like the crux of the matter right there.
Reminds me of a couple German who walked/hitchhiked across the globe and made a movie of while doing so: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weit._Die_Geschichte_von_einem... They get a baby in the middle of it but keep going…
radioactive molecules were probably born in a star... a big hunk of dirt hurling through space hardly creates any energy when compared to a star. We CONSUME...
What do you mean it doesnt scale as well?? It scales much better! It's super complex to extract mechanical work out of exploding pistons, if i need more energy with solar I just make bigger panels (or wait for some more…
hell yea! As a text only internet aficionado this thought makes me happy :-)
thank you for the clarification! Turns out I still have a few things to learn.
For some reason I doubt Max Planck wrote or said this after his death (1947). The person i meant (maybe it was Kuhn). Either way I think it is too harsh, and many of the scientists I know strive to minimize bias as much…
I am not a computer scientist so my understanding is "incomplete". I thought it stood for polynomial and non-polynomial time. But i do mix them up here and there. What i have read time and time again is that: If P≠NP…
thanks for the quote. Reading through it is clear that my understanding of P=NP is not complete enough. I would have thought n*M is precisely not polynomial but exponential time.
yea thats the name that was evading me, methinks.
From my experience in research this was already the case 15 years ago (and from older peers, way before). Science has always has "in-groups". I forget the name of some philosopher in the 50's who was the opinion science…
I believe this stems from an incomplete understanding of the problem space on my part (excuse the multiple puns); but, I am skeptical Knuth really said P=NP. There are so many mathemtical examples of equations that…
Leopold Aschenbrenner tried this and got eaten by the wolves as far as I can tell...
I have tried it in a French restaurant and it was delicious. Just don't think about how cute it would have been to cuddle instead. :-(
How is that an example of burying the lead? (I presume lede is the correct spelling, but burying lead for others to find in their drinking water amuses me.) EDIT: saw the picture and yes. That certainly was catchy, but…
Or the productivity gains, albeit substantial, are not as earth shattering as the llm providers would have you believe. As with any new technology adoption is a laggard. The internet "existed" in the late 80's, early…
Very interesting. LLMs at the state today certainly do feel like a Cambrian explosion on software with more code is being written/generated than ever. Throughout my career it felt like solving one problem opened the…
Being interested is also a lot more easy than to be interesting. The latter really depends on the eye of the beholder. Whereas I make it a game to find out what is interesting about the person across from me. Sometimes…
I like your list of "challenges" but have a personal issue with two of them: 1. "improve uniteds' plane shedule" -> the word "improve" does a lot of heavy lifting there.. 2. Turing test for me is solved: "AI expert" is…
I completely agree with everything you say here. I felt the critique in the article was way more strawman falacy than everything else. I use(d) git much more locally, and would never run into this problem because I…
lul what? As a linux fanboy who "speaks unix" (presumably, do I? not sure...). I find it humorous that we have gone full circle. The newest tech shit is recommending I learn almost 50 year old technology? Time for me to…
these days to me a device is bricked if I need to spend +1h recovering it. Happy linux user though through and through.
certainly! There are pro's and con's to fire still today. Us fireless plebs prefer a life much closer to nature, eating our meat raw and bathing in the mud.
I think bill gates summarized it pretty well in a recent letter [1]. There are pro's and con's to every new technology. Learning can be greatly accelerated with the use of llm's but you have to use them the right way.…
slop confirmed.