> There is a difference: - There are people who do, - And there are those who criticize. Weird shield to hide behind, considering there are also people who can do both.
> This doesn't make sense Makes perfect sense to anyone good at using these models. What doesn't make sense is that analogy. Typing prompts isn't even close to as difficult to baking bread.
I was doing contract work last year for a young solo founder, and he promised a feature to a big customer who only signed up because of this one feature. It was a feature he vibecoded and was able to demo in ways that…
> he :/
What about the 6x developers? Was there just a doubling multiplier across the board, resulting in them becoming 12x developers, or did they too become 20x developers?
Why humanoid? Surely there must be a superior physical form factor than one mimicking human anatomy. Is it just supposed to be more psychologically acceptable?
Good. I'm glad. Keep it up, China. Loving my cheap GLM and DeepSeek.
> They can put people in roles, reward those you like, punish those you don't like. Who don't enjoy that? Those of us without Machiavellian tendencies?
That might be a truism that's generally applicable, but some people have enough of a safety net to last them several years while building a business. We don't know OP's circumstances.
I work from home alone and frequently talk to my cats (I'm not crazy). Had to turn the feature off as well because of it.
Vibe coders don't know 'bout my dvh.
Would you trust the site if it did?
What if I only want 6x better performance? Is there a knob or slider to dial it down?
As part of a potential interview, I was given login credentials so I could sign in to a site where I was prompted to download a VPN client that would allow me to connect to the company's system (red flags already). They…
And promise not to cheat on him with any other model providers. I can hear the wedding bells already.
I know the HN guidelines discourage commenting on "tangential annoyances" on a website, but I think this issue is more than just tangential and more than just an annoyance. When an author is this relentless in pushing…
> There is a class of human output that will retain value regardless of AI capability: art and sport. I can't speak about sports, but I'll share an anecdote about art. A friend of mine shared an AI-produced song, and I…
I'm sure it's no loss to the author to lose out on close-minded readers. The author also added a little blurb to his article to address the concerns raised.
> 10x’ing our productivity Normalizing this "10x" language (well before AI) is a factor in this problem. It's been so loosely and casually thrown about in this industry. 10x engineer... 10x mindset... 10x growth... 10x…
Yes, we know. It was sarcasm.
I've been able to get LLMs to push back on ideas by just adding language to the system prompt requiring that they adopt a skeptical persona (insert whatever persona you want for your use case). I see the word…
> It's much harder to have a proper back and forth with a firehouse than it is a few sentences at a time. Sometimes just providing the context about an issue is itself enough to warrant a few paragraphs, let alone a few…
He clearly has a very narrow definition of "here" in mind.
These banal accusations are so dim and dull.
> My understanding is that they strongly believe in no false positives Who cares what they "believe" (or, more accurately, say they believe). What are the underlying processes that actually guarantee this, and what data…
> There is a difference: - There are people who do, - And there are those who criticize. Weird shield to hide behind, considering there are also people who can do both.
> This doesn't make sense Makes perfect sense to anyone good at using these models. What doesn't make sense is that analogy. Typing prompts isn't even close to as difficult to baking bread.
I was doing contract work last year for a young solo founder, and he promised a feature to a big customer who only signed up because of this one feature. It was a feature he vibecoded and was able to demo in ways that…
> he :/
What about the 6x developers? Was there just a doubling multiplier across the board, resulting in them becoming 12x developers, or did they too become 20x developers?
Why humanoid? Surely there must be a superior physical form factor than one mimicking human anatomy. Is it just supposed to be more psychologically acceptable?
Good. I'm glad. Keep it up, China. Loving my cheap GLM and DeepSeek.
> They can put people in roles, reward those you like, punish those you don't like. Who don't enjoy that? Those of us without Machiavellian tendencies?
That might be a truism that's generally applicable, but some people have enough of a safety net to last them several years while building a business. We don't know OP's circumstances.
I work from home alone and frequently talk to my cats (I'm not crazy). Had to turn the feature off as well because of it.
Vibe coders don't know 'bout my dvh.
Would you trust the site if it did?
What if I only want 6x better performance? Is there a knob or slider to dial it down?
As part of a potential interview, I was given login credentials so I could sign in to a site where I was prompted to download a VPN client that would allow me to connect to the company's system (red flags already). They…
And promise not to cheat on him with any other model providers. I can hear the wedding bells already.
I know the HN guidelines discourage commenting on "tangential annoyances" on a website, but I think this issue is more than just tangential and more than just an annoyance. When an author is this relentless in pushing…
> There is a class of human output that will retain value regardless of AI capability: art and sport. I can't speak about sports, but I'll share an anecdote about art. A friend of mine shared an AI-produced song, and I…
I'm sure it's no loss to the author to lose out on close-minded readers. The author also added a little blurb to his article to address the concerns raised.
> 10x’ing our productivity Normalizing this "10x" language (well before AI) is a factor in this problem. It's been so loosely and casually thrown about in this industry. 10x engineer... 10x mindset... 10x growth... 10x…
Yes, we know. It was sarcasm.
I've been able to get LLMs to push back on ideas by just adding language to the system prompt requiring that they adopt a skeptical persona (insert whatever persona you want for your use case). I see the word…
> It's much harder to have a proper back and forth with a firehouse than it is a few sentences at a time. Sometimes just providing the context about an issue is itself enough to warrant a few paragraphs, let alone a few…
He clearly has a very narrow definition of "here" in mind.
These banal accusations are so dim and dull.
> My understanding is that they strongly believe in no false positives Who cares what they "believe" (or, more accurately, say they believe). What are the underlying processes that actually guarantee this, and what data…