I did 1k (0.1 percent) then figured I'd done my job. No scripts, just human labor/algorithm. Could I boost it to 2-5x time with a simple JS script? Sure. However I figured rate limits were in place/that wasn't the…
Basically if a machine recommended it to you, its probably trash. Goes for search results, AI, product recommendations, etc.
"When you don't have a need for a cryptographic digest, it's important to think of the channel's bit error distribution in selecting a checksum algorithm." Important real-life-facts. There was no…
MD5 has/had a well-known "media" surface - lawyers/genomics folks had heard of it. Libraries had it as an accessible function (command line utilities, even). Sure, there are better non-cryptographic hashes, but, again…
I am curious as to your perspective as a physicist, do you think it is feasible to have a QC computer from an energy perspective? There is the cost to consider, yes, there is also an energy cost to a stable QC system.…
I did 1k (0.1 percent) then figured I'd done my job. No scripts, just human labor/algorithm. Could I boost it to 2-5x time with a simple JS script? Sure. However I figured rate limits were in place/that wasn't the…
Basically if a machine recommended it to you, its probably trash. Goes for search results, AI, product recommendations, etc.
"When you don't have a need for a cryptographic digest, it's important to think of the channel's bit error distribution in selecting a checksum algorithm." Important real-life-facts. There was no…
MD5 has/had a well-known "media" surface - lawyers/genomics folks had heard of it. Libraries had it as an accessible function (command line utilities, even). Sure, there are better non-cryptographic hashes, but, again…
I am curious as to your perspective as a physicist, do you think it is feasible to have a QC computer from an energy perspective? There is the cost to consider, yes, there is also an energy cost to a stable QC system.…