but philosophically could it create a problem it couldn't solve? And what would be the value in writing that out?
fewer mathematicians means fewer problems to solve. All problems have human origin, right? Can AI create a problem on its own and what would be the point? Closer to can god create a stone he can't lift.
it's a pretty good tool if you need a ransom payment after you hack a hospital
the tab era was the right mix for me. I retained all the mental context of what was going on and I could quickly ascertain if it had made a mistake. they just killed cmd+k for who knows why. Everything is agent or…
it's not their fault. they were given addictive smartphones or have parents addicted to them, bad teachers, etc.
if you take yourself out of the loop it will hurt your skills and career. Engineering blogs used to have some best practices you emulate, but the big ai companies you cannot mimic without their infrastructure
aren't mathematicians needed to create the problems? Everything solved so far is a question posed by a human. Which is probably why cracking diseases is more difficult (apart from man made viruses :/)
they deprecated the old layout which I very much preferred in open code desktop. I'm never in a rush so I'll wait for the early adopters to vouch for this release.
flooding the system with parts that may be incorrect hurts the whole process and will get people to tune out (like politics). Can't see the International Mathematical Union making a similar mistake because it would do…
yeah before all you needed was internet and an editor. Now to carry on it's $200 min
masking crime as innovation has been part of the tech playbook for a long time now
people actively deskilling themselves and becoming totally dependent on an ai pay to play service.
people don't care about privacy; every post on snowden does well here but it's a fart in the wind to the general public
it is sorta sad that framework development will dry up with fewer incentives.
a whole organization just pressing "OK" intermittently
thats the tough thing about investigative journalism / whistleblowers. You have to hope there's an audience who will care.
the 'arrest the parents!!!' has moved to the online domain, rightfully
=> If chess.com was worth billions and Daniel Rensch was threatening everyone to do what he says.
AI bros here and elsewhere seem to come at Terry Tao with "not so smart now are you?" viciousness that is off-putting.
reminds me of the TOS episode of South Park. By Checking this box you forfeit your millennium prize solution and may be turned into a human centipede at future date.
indie hacking seems dead-ish because everything can just be cloned instantly, and if you don't have a serious go to market plan with a latent user base you're SOL.
I stopped caring about the latest and greatest but because there's so much, the 'obsolete' free models do what I need and are worth the price.
"However, we also find that Llama 3.1 70B memorizes some books, like Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone and 1984, almost entirely. In fact, Harry Potter is so memorized that, using a seed prompt consisting of just…
the fact that llms can spit out books they've been trained on near verbatim lends some credence to this.
I took notice when he breaks down the ethics of gen ai as it pertains to online theft, that AI broke the natural order of putting content online where you'd trade exposure for use…
but philosophically could it create a problem it couldn't solve? And what would be the value in writing that out?
fewer mathematicians means fewer problems to solve. All problems have human origin, right? Can AI create a problem on its own and what would be the point? Closer to can god create a stone he can't lift.
it's a pretty good tool if you need a ransom payment after you hack a hospital
the tab era was the right mix for me. I retained all the mental context of what was going on and I could quickly ascertain if it had made a mistake. they just killed cmd+k for who knows why. Everything is agent or…
it's not their fault. they were given addictive smartphones or have parents addicted to them, bad teachers, etc.
if you take yourself out of the loop it will hurt your skills and career. Engineering blogs used to have some best practices you emulate, but the big ai companies you cannot mimic without their infrastructure
aren't mathematicians needed to create the problems? Everything solved so far is a question posed by a human. Which is probably why cracking diseases is more difficult (apart from man made viruses :/)
they deprecated the old layout which I very much preferred in open code desktop. I'm never in a rush so I'll wait for the early adopters to vouch for this release.
flooding the system with parts that may be incorrect hurts the whole process and will get people to tune out (like politics). Can't see the International Mathematical Union making a similar mistake because it would do…
yeah before all you needed was internet and an editor. Now to carry on it's $200 min
masking crime as innovation has been part of the tech playbook for a long time now
people actively deskilling themselves and becoming totally dependent on an ai pay to play service.
people don't care about privacy; every post on snowden does well here but it's a fart in the wind to the general public
it is sorta sad that framework development will dry up with fewer incentives.
a whole organization just pressing "OK" intermittently
thats the tough thing about investigative journalism / whistleblowers. You have to hope there's an audience who will care.
the 'arrest the parents!!!' has moved to the online domain, rightfully
=> If chess.com was worth billions and Daniel Rensch was threatening everyone to do what he says.
AI bros here and elsewhere seem to come at Terry Tao with "not so smart now are you?" viciousness that is off-putting.
reminds me of the TOS episode of South Park. By Checking this box you forfeit your millennium prize solution and may be turned into a human centipede at future date.
indie hacking seems dead-ish because everything can just be cloned instantly, and if you don't have a serious go to market plan with a latent user base you're SOL.
I stopped caring about the latest and greatest but because there's so much, the 'obsolete' free models do what I need and are worth the price.
"However, we also find that Llama 3.1 70B memorizes some books, like Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone and 1984, almost entirely. In fact, Harry Potter is so memorized that, using a seed prompt consisting of just…
the fact that llms can spit out books they've been trained on near verbatim lends some credence to this.
I took notice when he breaks down the ethics of gen ai as it pertains to online theft, that AI broke the natural order of putting content online where you'd trade exposure for use…