not all knowledge can easily be translated into a pipeline alike game imho
Isn't this result a clear challenge to the "true" intelligence of LLMs argument? Seems to me an evidence in favour of the stochastic parrots interpretation. Am I missing something?
so simple yet so deep! anyone willing to provide a math-proof like argument on why the shape seem to stick to the YY curve indefinitely as the "eternal" name suggests? Should it always be this way or is there at least…
not all knowledge can easily be translated into a pipeline alike game imho
Isn't this result a clear challenge to the "true" intelligence of LLMs argument? Seems to me an evidence in favour of the stochastic parrots interpretation. Am I missing something?
so simple yet so deep! anyone willing to provide a math-proof like argument on why the shape seem to stick to the YY curve indefinitely as the "eternal" name suggests? Should it always be this way or is there at least…