If you want real numbers start selling hard drugs. You don't have to "serve the people". YouTube is a cesspool.
> As a professional YouTuber Well, there's your problem. You want the numbers that come from mass consumption, which means catering to the lowest common denominator thus producing shit with gold plating while then…
Conversations in its training data that explicitly mentioned "make no mistakes" don't strike me as particularly rich sources of high-quality reasoning signals. They strike me as conversations with Pointy-haired Bosses.
You jest but I indeed find rejection an integral part of the job. Not plainly saying "no, get away", but backing up, requesting big picture views and trying to see if the overall organization is in need of and capable…
> You still need to architect the system to encode the invariants in types. That's the problem though, right? If it's pointed out we all agree the "do not keep credentials alive" is a property that should hold and we…
Yes, I agree. I find the addition of the regression test the true long-term fix. The code is just an opaque incantation that may or may not preserve some property we find worth preserving and we have no way of knowing…
While I can see the shortcomings of C and generally don't recommend it for new projects I don't see this particular bug as a good example of something Rust's borrow checker or some other language's type system will…
Changing a few words is thus enough to clear this case. What's the point of this exercise exactly? Both products are so incredibly derivative and boring that I find it very, very hard to care about this "case".
Well done, Claude!
If you want real numbers start selling hard drugs. You don't have to "serve the people". YouTube is a cesspool.
> As a professional YouTuber Well, there's your problem. You want the numbers that come from mass consumption, which means catering to the lowest common denominator thus producing shit with gold plating while then…
Conversations in its training data that explicitly mentioned "make no mistakes" don't strike me as particularly rich sources of high-quality reasoning signals. They strike me as conversations with Pointy-haired Bosses.
You jest but I indeed find rejection an integral part of the job. Not plainly saying "no, get away", but backing up, requesting big picture views and trying to see if the overall organization is in need of and capable…
> You still need to architect the system to encode the invariants in types. That's the problem though, right? If it's pointed out we all agree the "do not keep credentials alive" is a property that should hold and we…
Yes, I agree. I find the addition of the regression test the true long-term fix. The code is just an opaque incantation that may or may not preserve some property we find worth preserving and we have no way of knowing…
While I can see the shortcomings of C and generally don't recommend it for new projects I don't see this particular bug as a good example of something Rust's borrow checker or some other language's type system will…
Changing a few words is thus enough to clear this case. What's the point of this exercise exactly? Both products are so incredibly derivative and boring that I find it very, very hard to care about this "case".
Well done, Claude!