> What I have been missing in all this debate is substance. That’s strange because in this (and Andrew’s in lesser extent) post there’s plenty of substance on both technical, management and corporate influences like the…
Do also frown upon people working in nursing homes? Or your uber driver? No one frowns upon the people who work/help people who need it.
Hire not enslave! Like how you might hire a driver, or housemaid, or anyone to do a salaried or contract job? How does that perpetuates the problem?
If they pay her what she’s owed and the damages. She can get her place, hire people and pay them to care of her or help her.
Maybe in previous failed attempts that what the model landed on and they’re preemptively stopping it. Did they release the any info on the failed attempts?
The article reads like a compilation of online chatter, social media post, etc. on AI. Not surprising to find unsubstantiated imaginary numbers there.
In the farm?
> It's just standard nerd drama. The elephant in the room are the trillion $ companies having a horse in this race.
That sounds like a good idea but how do you know what you’re shipping?
It's so sad that Rust vs Zig has been dragged into the AI psychosis vs anti AI narratives. I feel people are taking sides or picking and choosing now based on their allegiance and religious values. What good comes out…
> non-deterministic problems I'm guessing you mean probabilistic? Nevertheless, you have an indeterministic variable here which is what the LLM generates.
You have to put similar amount of resources when writing in Rust as well. With the difference that it’s more front loaded. Personally I’m a fan of Rust’s approach but the price for having bug free code has to be paid,…
Not really. It seems like the Rust rewrite blog post triggered this. Which, even though I don’t agree with the tone, seems to be valid criticism.
> and the project leaving isn't as good for Zig as Andrew is making it seem In this case, Bun was acquired by Anthropic. Leaving Zig is not necessarily out of merit. As much as they pretend it was.
> gpt3->4o->sonnet4->opus4.6->fable While there are a lot of resources being poured into improving and integrating tooling and use cases and increasing model sizes, the leap between the models you notes are not as much…
> Cue some story here on a bank or airline somewhere still relying on cobol backend servers. There's existing money and expertise in those environments to rewrite the whole thing, yet they don't. You may loan them free…
Well I was agreeing with you. Skimmed the paper as well.
> A subset of python is python. Half a tomato is still tomato The funny thing about this is not that the first sentence is wrong, which it is. It’s the failed reductio ad absurdum.
> I’d prefer a more direct claim in a paper This is not written to be just a paper. The target audience include media and online forums, and then maybe academia. Edit: typo
>I don’t have access to my flavor of LLM on the train nor the time or budget to have it do the research and summary for me Aren't you gonna let the LLM develop for you anyway? Why bother writing and reading a post at…
Not the original commenter; but, at least for me, the idea is that when it’s written by humans we know that effort and care were put into communicating the news. Otherwise they could post a link to the docs and we could…
> If the team (or agent swarm) isn't performing well it often isn't a problem with them. It's a problem with the new manager still trying to stay on top of everything and micromanaging all the things. You see problems…
You can have billions of valuation even without having any real product. It’s just make believe sometimes. Remember Nikola and Milton? There’s a solo founder for you. 30 freaking Bs.
> I get the threat of pervasive AI I think this contradicts with your first sentence.
[dead]
> What I have been missing in all this debate is substance. That’s strange because in this (and Andrew’s in lesser extent) post there’s plenty of substance on both technical, management and corporate influences like the…
Do also frown upon people working in nursing homes? Or your uber driver? No one frowns upon the people who work/help people who need it.
Hire not enslave! Like how you might hire a driver, or housemaid, or anyone to do a salaried or contract job? How does that perpetuates the problem?
If they pay her what she’s owed and the damages. She can get her place, hire people and pay them to care of her or help her.
Maybe in previous failed attempts that what the model landed on and they’re preemptively stopping it. Did they release the any info on the failed attempts?
The article reads like a compilation of online chatter, social media post, etc. on AI. Not surprising to find unsubstantiated imaginary numbers there.
In the farm?
> It's just standard nerd drama. The elephant in the room are the trillion $ companies having a horse in this race.
That sounds like a good idea but how do you know what you’re shipping?
It's so sad that Rust vs Zig has been dragged into the AI psychosis vs anti AI narratives. I feel people are taking sides or picking and choosing now based on their allegiance and religious values. What good comes out…
> non-deterministic problems I'm guessing you mean probabilistic? Nevertheless, you have an indeterministic variable here which is what the LLM generates.
You have to put similar amount of resources when writing in Rust as well. With the difference that it’s more front loaded. Personally I’m a fan of Rust’s approach but the price for having bug free code has to be paid,…
Not really. It seems like the Rust rewrite blog post triggered this. Which, even though I don’t agree with the tone, seems to be valid criticism.
> and the project leaving isn't as good for Zig as Andrew is making it seem In this case, Bun was acquired by Anthropic. Leaving Zig is not necessarily out of merit. As much as they pretend it was.
> gpt3->4o->sonnet4->opus4.6->fable While there are a lot of resources being poured into improving and integrating tooling and use cases and increasing model sizes, the leap between the models you notes are not as much…
> Cue some story here on a bank or airline somewhere still relying on cobol backend servers. There's existing money and expertise in those environments to rewrite the whole thing, yet they don't. You may loan them free…
Well I was agreeing with you. Skimmed the paper as well.
> A subset of python is python. Half a tomato is still tomato The funny thing about this is not that the first sentence is wrong, which it is. It’s the failed reductio ad absurdum.
> I’d prefer a more direct claim in a paper This is not written to be just a paper. The target audience include media and online forums, and then maybe academia. Edit: typo
>I don’t have access to my flavor of LLM on the train nor the time or budget to have it do the research and summary for me Aren't you gonna let the LLM develop for you anyway? Why bother writing and reading a post at…
Not the original commenter; but, at least for me, the idea is that when it’s written by humans we know that effort and care were put into communicating the news. Otherwise they could post a link to the docs and we could…
> If the team (or agent swarm) isn't performing well it often isn't a problem with them. It's a problem with the new manager still trying to stay on top of everything and micromanaging all the things. You see problems…
You can have billions of valuation even without having any real product. It’s just make believe sometimes. Remember Nikola and Milton? There’s a solo founder for you. 30 freaking Bs.
> I get the threat of pervasive AI I think this contradicts with your first sentence.
[dead]