It’s so cute that some people imagine the armed forces and police were on the other side or are on their side. If you’re average Joe, the police in a tyrannical state are never on your “side”.
Do you foresee that AI will be able to count Rs in strawberry by then? Jokes aside, by then we're gonna have StarTrek Replicators. Exciting!
So when they release those model, we all will be solving millennium prize problems?
But people do unpaid painting, horseback riding, calligraphy, etc. which are outdated because they love it. Why is it so unfortunate for you?
> And unfortunately, that works pretty well. Why unfortunately?
There’s no such thing as a read/write head in transformers. You can use it as a metaphor but that’s a leaky metaphor, hence all these misunderstandings. > In fact it has N read / write heads equal to the size of the…
> If the volume of work goes up, its cost goes down. Supply and demand. What?! Good to know. When contractor comes to do the kitchen, I will make them do the garden and will reduce the money I’d pay them, because supply…
> Same idea for that transformer It’s not the same for transformers, especially not with the theoretical infinite context. It simply doesn’t process tokens in O(1) in your given setup. In practice, with frontier LLMs,…
So are you saying they should be paying more for more work but they are not?
> employers would ever pay you the same amount of money to do less work? Shouldn’t they now pay more for more work?
[flagged]
Then anyone with access to their api’s could’ve come up with these already.
Any basic lookup table is turing complete if you bolt an external infinite tape and read/write head onto it. But then that’s moving the goal post since the context wouldn’t be the “limitless tape” and it’s not a…
> but have stopped hiring for pretty much 4 consecutive years since. What’s your theory?
Right now, a hiccup in Chinese production of a certain IC may make buying toilet paper harder in Germany! It’s naive to think that such drastic changes (mass unemployment) will not be extremely turbulent (to put it…
Of course it is. You’re conflating a turing machine with a transformer. Transformers don’t have a local read/write head. The [self] attention is over the whole context, which makes each step O(N) at best (with caching)…
The context acting as a "theoretically limitless tape" while simultaneously the step being O(1) are contradictory. You cannot have it both.
> History shows us that the more free market an economy is, the more prosperous it is. Ad infinitum? No it doesn’t. > Prices for software have gone to zero. On earth? > Software engineers routinely become millionaires,…
Have we saturated all tasks that can be done by computers through development?
The hungry needs to eat. If majority are hungry and everything is concentrated in a small group of people, they’ll eat them. Has happened before with lower than 25% rate.
What’s the reason for the stagnation/decline since 2022?
> breaking the company back up into smaller companies that preserve the stability of the workforce. Blasphemy! Bring the torches!
Absolute free market, like any other idea taken extreme, is cancerous.
> Don't see why it shouldn't Don't see why it should! Unless there's a harness like in math for other fields.
Neither do we have those now. Also in the future, we’ll have opposing nations having their own robot army. It’s not as simplistic as some make it out to be.
It’s so cute that some people imagine the armed forces and police were on the other side or are on their side. If you’re average Joe, the police in a tyrannical state are never on your “side”.
Do you foresee that AI will be able to count Rs in strawberry by then? Jokes aside, by then we're gonna have StarTrek Replicators. Exciting!
So when they release those model, we all will be solving millennium prize problems?
But people do unpaid painting, horseback riding, calligraphy, etc. which are outdated because they love it. Why is it so unfortunate for you?
> And unfortunately, that works pretty well. Why unfortunately?
There’s no such thing as a read/write head in transformers. You can use it as a metaphor but that’s a leaky metaphor, hence all these misunderstandings. > In fact it has N read / write heads equal to the size of the…
> If the volume of work goes up, its cost goes down. Supply and demand. What?! Good to know. When contractor comes to do the kitchen, I will make them do the garden and will reduce the money I’d pay them, because supply…
> Same idea for that transformer It’s not the same for transformers, especially not with the theoretical infinite context. It simply doesn’t process tokens in O(1) in your given setup. In practice, with frontier LLMs,…
So are you saying they should be paying more for more work but they are not?
> employers would ever pay you the same amount of money to do less work? Shouldn’t they now pay more for more work?
[flagged]
Then anyone with access to their api’s could’ve come up with these already.
Any basic lookup table is turing complete if you bolt an external infinite tape and read/write head onto it. But then that’s moving the goal post since the context wouldn’t be the “limitless tape” and it’s not a…
> but have stopped hiring for pretty much 4 consecutive years since. What’s your theory?
Right now, a hiccup in Chinese production of a certain IC may make buying toilet paper harder in Germany! It’s naive to think that such drastic changes (mass unemployment) will not be extremely turbulent (to put it…
Of course it is. You’re conflating a turing machine with a transformer. Transformers don’t have a local read/write head. The [self] attention is over the whole context, which makes each step O(N) at best (with caching)…
The context acting as a "theoretically limitless tape" while simultaneously the step being O(1) are contradictory. You cannot have it both.
> History shows us that the more free market an economy is, the more prosperous it is. Ad infinitum? No it doesn’t. > Prices for software have gone to zero. On earth? > Software engineers routinely become millionaires,…
Have we saturated all tasks that can be done by computers through development?
The hungry needs to eat. If majority are hungry and everything is concentrated in a small group of people, they’ll eat them. Has happened before with lower than 25% rate.
What’s the reason for the stagnation/decline since 2022?
> breaking the company back up into smaller companies that preserve the stability of the workforce. Blasphemy! Bring the torches!
Absolute free market, like any other idea taken extreme, is cancerous.
> Don't see why it shouldn't Don't see why it should! Unless there's a harness like in math for other fields.
Neither do we have those now. Also in the future, we’ll have opposing nations having their own robot army. It’s not as simplistic as some make it out to be.