The levels of irony here are peaking. - slop article that itself feels AI generated; - using a movie quote, like, from an actor and script and stuff; - a quote that itself is super smug and on the nose; - saying…
[flagged]
"How to protect AI" LOL humanity is fucking done.
human attention is all you need
Damn that goalposting issue is so easy to solve! See: - make another bullshit benchmark and name it "humanity's last humanlike intelligence benchmark" and overfit to it; - make rich talkinghead twit about it p r o f o u…
Absolutely. "non-Cliffordness" by consturction already implies "Cliffordness", which by construction implies "Clifford" and then connects other related things. Magic doesn't do that exactly, but instead slips…
Should call the next big physics thing doubtscumbagium...
Essence of gacha games is predatory monetisation realised via fomo, drip feeding and sex - not numbers.
The point of all of that is to become god, straight up unironically.
Births is, sans miscalculation, a number that tracks exact events. Is the "capability" number on these LLM strengh graphs as tangible? I think it would be interesting to visit a reality that obeys arbitrary…
> It's not just impactful, it's consequential
Yeah but well you see, humans did not go extinct from just asbestos!
Unfathomable incident: arbitrary entity misusing its arbitrarily assigned unilateral power, following perverted incentives.
But then he wouldn't have a justification for AI companies to rob people! And you are suggesting robbing himself of this justification!
I should stop starring as a joke or as a bookmark...
Because elites hate you moreso than downtrodden (they love miserable people in a sense). You are an independent agent with your own ideas, worst case you are completely orthogonal to the hierarchy, and this is something…
Huh, casually flexing with a sentient pocket calculator!!!
Instruction from the user is clear: I should avoid testing on dummies and proceed straight to testing on humans.
Some parties wouldn't be thrilled about their "source available" getting cleaned this way. So when this gets completed it would only "clean" real open source that can't afford legal trouble. Satirically structured LLM…
I am bitter about this. Do you really with your mind and with your heart believe that: - LLMs are fundamentally fit for this type of comprehension - Misjudgements posted in this thread are "bugs", "errors" - Agents who…
I feel a sort of disappointment in how easily languages got swindled. There is seemingly no winning angle this time. This is the most doomed I've ever felt.
You've built an interesting statistic from gathering data across the project. The real answer: ai models and agentic apps make building spam tools more simple than ever. All you actually need is just some trivial api…
This correlation you are observing is real.
At my current job I am in deep net LOC negative despite all new features... Somebody is getting fired and sued for stealing all these LOCs from the company...
The only "satisfying" answer to that for me is: "This question doesn't seem to make sense, could you clarify ...".
The levels of irony here are peaking. - slop article that itself feels AI generated; - using a movie quote, like, from an actor and script and stuff; - a quote that itself is super smug and on the nose; - saying…
[flagged]
"How to protect AI" LOL humanity is fucking done.
human attention is all you need
Damn that goalposting issue is so easy to solve! See: - make another bullshit benchmark and name it "humanity's last humanlike intelligence benchmark" and overfit to it; - make rich talkinghead twit about it p r o f o u…
Absolutely. "non-Cliffordness" by consturction already implies "Cliffordness", which by construction implies "Clifford" and then connects other related things. Magic doesn't do that exactly, but instead slips…
Should call the next big physics thing doubtscumbagium...
Essence of gacha games is predatory monetisation realised via fomo, drip feeding and sex - not numbers.
The point of all of that is to become god, straight up unironically.
Births is, sans miscalculation, a number that tracks exact events. Is the "capability" number on these LLM strengh graphs as tangible? I think it would be interesting to visit a reality that obeys arbitrary…
> It's not just impactful, it's consequential
Yeah but well you see, humans did not go extinct from just asbestos!
Unfathomable incident: arbitrary entity misusing its arbitrarily assigned unilateral power, following perverted incentives.
But then he wouldn't have a justification for AI companies to rob people! And you are suggesting robbing himself of this justification!
I should stop starring as a joke or as a bookmark...
Because elites hate you moreso than downtrodden (they love miserable people in a sense). You are an independent agent with your own ideas, worst case you are completely orthogonal to the hierarchy, and this is something…
Huh, casually flexing with a sentient pocket calculator!!!
Instruction from the user is clear: I should avoid testing on dummies and proceed straight to testing on humans.
Some parties wouldn't be thrilled about their "source available" getting cleaned this way. So when this gets completed it would only "clean" real open source that can't afford legal trouble. Satirically structured LLM…
I am bitter about this. Do you really with your mind and with your heart believe that: - LLMs are fundamentally fit for this type of comprehension - Misjudgements posted in this thread are "bugs", "errors" - Agents who…
I feel a sort of disappointment in how easily languages got swindled. There is seemingly no winning angle this time. This is the most doomed I've ever felt.
You've built an interesting statistic from gathering data across the project. The real answer: ai models and agentic apps make building spam tools more simple than ever. All you actually need is just some trivial api…
This correlation you are observing is real.
At my current job I am in deep net LOC negative despite all new features... Somebody is getting fired and sued for stealing all these LOCs from the company...
The only "satisfying" answer to that for me is: "This question doesn't seem to make sense, could you clarify ...".