I guess time will tell, I know I'm not giving those things any direct stdin access without a hole suite of safeguards in between
thanks, will take a closer look
Not as air tight as a container Edit: it’s about the attack surface
Yes but the encompassing service has the account, not the agent. You can completely segregate it from the rest of the system, like you’d treat an intruder
And how many of those services can check your box and find permission escalation strategies on its own?
The standard here is not enough when the agent can escalate by finding 0 days, for example. It’s like giving a black hat a limited account. Sure it might restrict him, but not giving him an account at all is way better
This model is already not perfect, and not at all built for agents. The only way to secure an agent is an air-gap with the execution layer. Treat it like text, and the problem never arises until you “interpret” the…
But none of these services have the kind of latent capabilities an agent has, you know a deterministic service’s constraint are its code+bugs. There are no such constraints in an agent…
Why would you give a non-deterministic text generator a user account? It’s not a person, it’s barely a tool at the software level. Restrict at the right level, in this case, a complete sandbox around it given its…
Let’s assume their marketing argument is in good faith (it isn’t, they’re just capturing market knowing very well they won’t replace most software dev): Where did Anthropic say that they want to “end” software…
The AI panic has infiltrated the space now, and it’s just as bad as the AI hype. Half formed ideas, emotional posts with personal attacks and arrogant language, exaggerated claims, posturing, etc. In the meantime, most…
> Anthropic is actively campaigning to end software engineering I didn’t read further, this is just sensationalism at its crudest
I really don’t agree here. The focus should be on combating the observational bias that is the cause of these decisions. The doctors remember the “futile” cares for the patients where it had the worst results. We’re…
M5 max has 614GB/s, you mean the m4?
I know I sound childish, but I'm very excited to see our UIs catching up to sci-fi movies. Very cool work, I'll check it out today
From memory, a mbp m5 128gb is around 800
Functional programming very much has states. But you’re describing the transitions instead of the states directly. What it does is removing the hidden states and effects and makes them typed, explicit and contained
250GB/s on unified memory? That doesn’t sound right, it’s very low
Sorry but gamers are the most docile customer base, this won’t translate to anything.
Bingo
Maybe North Korean labs
Oh well, guess that settles it /s
Well that’s a lot of platitudes for such a short post…
lol, are you the author by any chance?
What an unpleasant read
I guess time will tell, I know I'm not giving those things any direct stdin access without a hole suite of safeguards in between
thanks, will take a closer look
Not as air tight as a container Edit: it’s about the attack surface
Yes but the encompassing service has the account, not the agent. You can completely segregate it from the rest of the system, like you’d treat an intruder
And how many of those services can check your box and find permission escalation strategies on its own?
The standard here is not enough when the agent can escalate by finding 0 days, for example. It’s like giving a black hat a limited account. Sure it might restrict him, but not giving him an account at all is way better
This model is already not perfect, and not at all built for agents. The only way to secure an agent is an air-gap with the execution layer. Treat it like text, and the problem never arises until you “interpret” the…
But none of these services have the kind of latent capabilities an agent has, you know a deterministic service’s constraint are its code+bugs. There are no such constraints in an agent…
Why would you give a non-deterministic text generator a user account? It’s not a person, it’s barely a tool at the software level. Restrict at the right level, in this case, a complete sandbox around it given its…
Let’s assume their marketing argument is in good faith (it isn’t, they’re just capturing market knowing very well they won’t replace most software dev): Where did Anthropic say that they want to “end” software…
The AI panic has infiltrated the space now, and it’s just as bad as the AI hype. Half formed ideas, emotional posts with personal attacks and arrogant language, exaggerated claims, posturing, etc. In the meantime, most…
> Anthropic is actively campaigning to end software engineering I didn’t read further, this is just sensationalism at its crudest
I really don’t agree here. The focus should be on combating the observational bias that is the cause of these decisions. The doctors remember the “futile” cares for the patients where it had the worst results. We’re…
M5 max has 614GB/s, you mean the m4?
I know I sound childish, but I'm very excited to see our UIs catching up to sci-fi movies. Very cool work, I'll check it out today
From memory, a mbp m5 128gb is around 800
Functional programming very much has states. But you’re describing the transitions instead of the states directly. What it does is removing the hidden states and effects and makes them typed, explicit and contained
250GB/s on unified memory? That doesn’t sound right, it’s very low
Sorry but gamers are the most docile customer base, this won’t translate to anything.
Bingo
Maybe North Korean labs
Oh well, guess that settles it /s
Well that’s a lot of platitudes for such a short post…
lol, are you the author by any chance?
What an unpleasant read