Sorry, also there is #startups on freenode.
Yes. Its not really official though, just a few hang out there. #hackernews on freenode.
ebook later, get it out there asap, would like to read. My thinking is very similar to your own. Its actually something we've been doing for an API at work. The main reason was so we can easily port legacy code [read…
>People love to write build system after build system, in every field, a fetish I've never quite understood. I have a firm suspicion its what writing a framework, cms, or blogging platform used to be. In time the leader…
Thanks, very helpful. One upvote, sincerely not enough.
Is anyone a little more versed in US law able to explain what kind of precedent this sets for further cases in Iowa or I'm guessing to be nation wide due to the judge being federal?
I could be a bit off base, and to be honest am only now coming to grips with unit testing fully, but I find if something is painful to test my implementation wasn't good to begin with. I'm guessing this is where writing…
In my case a cache could be something remote, having any calls directly to that will slow down unit tests a lot, having one or two calls to it unit testing the cache implementation it self is OK, but having every method…
Not only can you mock it for testing but it encapsulates the system better, there is no reason for straight access to C.get with this pattern you can easily drop in a brand new system for caching and not break your…
Sorry, also there is #startups on freenode.
Yes. Its not really official though, just a few hang out there. #hackernews on freenode.
ebook later, get it out there asap, would like to read. My thinking is very similar to your own. Its actually something we've been doing for an API at work. The main reason was so we can easily port legacy code [read…
>People love to write build system after build system, in every field, a fetish I've never quite understood. I have a firm suspicion its what writing a framework, cms, or blogging platform used to be. In time the leader…
Thanks, very helpful. One upvote, sincerely not enough.
Is anyone a little more versed in US law able to explain what kind of precedent this sets for further cases in Iowa or I'm guessing to be nation wide due to the judge being federal?
I could be a bit off base, and to be honest am only now coming to grips with unit testing fully, but I find if something is painful to test my implementation wasn't good to begin with. I'm guessing this is where writing…
In my case a cache could be something remote, having any calls directly to that will slow down unit tests a lot, having one or two calls to it unit testing the cache implementation it self is OK, but having every method…
Not only can you mock it for testing but it encapsulates the system better, there is no reason for straight access to C.get with this pattern you can easily drop in a brand new system for caching and not break your…