[flagged]
The orthography principle.
No. Your assessment is obviously subjective because you say that UI/UX is better on Windows than on macOS which is objectively wrong.
I've been using it since over two years and it has never worked.
Americans don't walk, they drive so their shoes are very clean.
How is "side-effects free" less fancy and trendy than functional?
Yeah objectively it's not very funny at all.
A company launching something broken is proof of their poor quality control.
I'm always sad to see these things being trained on a tiny number of programming languages. Makes it harder still for the good languages to compete.
Have you Read the lyrics to "For You" recently? It's not the rhymes that make them give me goosebumps
The thing that barely anybody seems to mention is that what elevates Springsteens best moments is Roy Bittan's piano playing.
Which OOP language is not fundamentally broken? Smalltalk?
Yes! Also creating seven layers of interfaces or class hierarchies is not "abstraction". It's just a bad idea.
Anybody remember the Canyonero?
You can pay for it
Actual "swearing" is dumb. Like swearing by the moon, and the stars, and the sky.
If you do, you should get some professional help
Thank you for this.
Would be nice if it had a story or characters.
The real problem are the disgusting sound mixes that make you not hear voices and have your ears explode when a car passes by.
Yeah who needs well-being, a healthy back or cardiovascular health anyway?
Please use PureScript with us and lead a happy life
Programming practice
Also I don't think that's what "trivial" means
Yeah it works whenever you yourself can infer the type without it already.
[flagged]
The orthography principle.
No. Your assessment is obviously subjective because you say that UI/UX is better on Windows than on macOS which is objectively wrong.
I've been using it since over two years and it has never worked.
Americans don't walk, they drive so their shoes are very clean.
How is "side-effects free" less fancy and trendy than functional?
Yeah objectively it's not very funny at all.
A company launching something broken is proof of their poor quality control.
I'm always sad to see these things being trained on a tiny number of programming languages. Makes it harder still for the good languages to compete.
Have you Read the lyrics to "For You" recently? It's not the rhymes that make them give me goosebumps
The thing that barely anybody seems to mention is that what elevates Springsteens best moments is Roy Bittan's piano playing.
Which OOP language is not fundamentally broken? Smalltalk?
Yes! Also creating seven layers of interfaces or class hierarchies is not "abstraction". It's just a bad idea.
Anybody remember the Canyonero?
You can pay for it
Actual "swearing" is dumb. Like swearing by the moon, and the stars, and the sky.
If you do, you should get some professional help
Thank you for this.
Would be nice if it had a story or characters.
The real problem are the disgusting sound mixes that make you not hear voices and have your ears explode when a car passes by.
Yeah who needs well-being, a healthy back or cardiovascular health anyway?
Please use PureScript with us and lead a happy life
Programming practice
Also I don't think that's what "trivial" means
Yeah it works whenever you yourself can infer the type without it already.