> I’m not sure how you came to believe there aren’t rules in life, but there absolutely are. This is why I fucking hate commenting on this website. You know exactly what I meant but you wrote this bullshit anyway.
> If I sit down to play chess with Magnus Carlsen I can't predict the exact moves he'll use to defeat me, but that's a bad reason to think he won't defeat me This is a very bad analogy because chess isn't life. In…
Just less important than personally making generational wealth.
> I don't care if the Waymo isn't "truly" intelligent, it drives better than I do, that's a very good thing. The funny thing about Waymos is that they seem amazing driving all on their own everywhere until it rains (as…
You're the one calling people horses. I'm the one saying, "No, you're probably better than that." Which one of us is being rude here?
Only if you accept that you are as stupid and unadaptable as a horse.
The problem remains the same. If you have to change the same value in n places, you need to know that the AI correctly updated it in those n places, so knowing what they are is prerequisite to claiming that the AI got…
I'm not arguing that the government's actions towards Anthropic are fair, but you're making the argument that no government should ever be allowed to designate any company as a supply chain risk, and that's ludicrous.
> Another issue with looking at code, is that it's very hard to manually change things anyway. I can't just change a variable from 10 to 20, because I don't know where it is used. This should be a giant flashing red…
> Private property and being able to run your firm on your own terms applies to everyone. In theory, maybe. In reality, this is a privilege for a very small number of rich people. > Anything that erodes the rights of…
Big organizations don't enable greater technological progress, which is why companies do 98% of their innovation before they get huge, and get bad at innovating once they are. Big organizations enable scaling and…
> In a large enough organization it is simply impossible for executives to be on the ground floor with everyone else. And not only is it impossible, it is essentially a waste of their time. They could maybe be maximally…
> I guess we were all lacking wisdom. Yes, economists famously do, and they also lack intelligence and knowledge given that their theories keep being proven wrong by reality but they never update them.
> If human "skill" and "imagination" are your requirements for interesting, you're going to become permanently bored fairly soon I reckon. What? Why? This has been my bar for my entire life, and I've never been bored…
This bullshit disingenuous false equivalency again. In both photoshop and painting, the human using the tool decides what strokes to use. That isn't true with AI art. It's not "just another tool" for doing the activity…
No you couldn't, because you can't compose AI art. The AI composes it, and it can't feel hate.
Context.
> Sure it's not some 9/10 hand made poster, but considering these take 30 seconds to make, it's impressive. It's not impressive. It would be impressive if a human did it, but a human did not do it. Is it impressive when…
Yes, context matters. The greatest painting in the world is just crushed materials smeared on a canvas, it's nothing too special without the context. A computer (not even an LLM, just something generating random pixels)…
Past performance is no indication of future success. It doesn't matter what's been successful in the past, these things can change. Communism was considered more successful than capitalism for a large chunk of the 20th…
> Doesn't this just boil down to planned vs free market economy? Not at all. Market vs planned economy is about how the economy is set up. Are there businesses that offer products that you can choose between? That's a…
> A lot of techies have lived in China and seen how that country has stronger social harmony than the West and is gradually outpacing it, so mass surveillance clearly isn't an obstacle to the general prosperity. They…
Because all the important ones have been true since 2022 and will be true forever, because they have nothing to do with LLM capabilities and instead are focused on LLM nature.
How do you figure? I can't see how any accounting gets it under 7 days (the LLM took 10 days to write the first version of the code), and the one I would use is closer to 2 months (time from conception to release). Not…
Because bad behavior tends to scale with company size, not because smaller companies are more virtuous, but because they just have less power to do harm than bigger companies. Imagine that there were only two companies,…
> I’m not sure how you came to believe there aren’t rules in life, but there absolutely are. This is why I fucking hate commenting on this website. You know exactly what I meant but you wrote this bullshit anyway.
> If I sit down to play chess with Magnus Carlsen I can't predict the exact moves he'll use to defeat me, but that's a bad reason to think he won't defeat me This is a very bad analogy because chess isn't life. In…
Just less important than personally making generational wealth.
> I don't care if the Waymo isn't "truly" intelligent, it drives better than I do, that's a very good thing. The funny thing about Waymos is that they seem amazing driving all on their own everywhere until it rains (as…
You're the one calling people horses. I'm the one saying, "No, you're probably better than that." Which one of us is being rude here?
Only if you accept that you are as stupid and unadaptable as a horse.
The problem remains the same. If you have to change the same value in n places, you need to know that the AI correctly updated it in those n places, so knowing what they are is prerequisite to claiming that the AI got…
I'm not arguing that the government's actions towards Anthropic are fair, but you're making the argument that no government should ever be allowed to designate any company as a supply chain risk, and that's ludicrous.
> Another issue with looking at code, is that it's very hard to manually change things anyway. I can't just change a variable from 10 to 20, because I don't know where it is used. This should be a giant flashing red…
> Private property and being able to run your firm on your own terms applies to everyone. In theory, maybe. In reality, this is a privilege for a very small number of rich people. > Anything that erodes the rights of…
Big organizations don't enable greater technological progress, which is why companies do 98% of their innovation before they get huge, and get bad at innovating once they are. Big organizations enable scaling and…
> In a large enough organization it is simply impossible for executives to be on the ground floor with everyone else. And not only is it impossible, it is essentially a waste of their time. They could maybe be maximally…
> I guess we were all lacking wisdom. Yes, economists famously do, and they also lack intelligence and knowledge given that their theories keep being proven wrong by reality but they never update them.
> If human "skill" and "imagination" are your requirements for interesting, you're going to become permanently bored fairly soon I reckon. What? Why? This has been my bar for my entire life, and I've never been bored…
This bullshit disingenuous false equivalency again. In both photoshop and painting, the human using the tool decides what strokes to use. That isn't true with AI art. It's not "just another tool" for doing the activity…
No you couldn't, because you can't compose AI art. The AI composes it, and it can't feel hate.
Context.
> Sure it's not some 9/10 hand made poster, but considering these take 30 seconds to make, it's impressive. It's not impressive. It would be impressive if a human did it, but a human did not do it. Is it impressive when…
Yes, context matters. The greatest painting in the world is just crushed materials smeared on a canvas, it's nothing too special without the context. A computer (not even an LLM, just something generating random pixels)…
Past performance is no indication of future success. It doesn't matter what's been successful in the past, these things can change. Communism was considered more successful than capitalism for a large chunk of the 20th…
> Doesn't this just boil down to planned vs free market economy? Not at all. Market vs planned economy is about how the economy is set up. Are there businesses that offer products that you can choose between? That's a…
> A lot of techies have lived in China and seen how that country has stronger social harmony than the West and is gradually outpacing it, so mass surveillance clearly isn't an obstacle to the general prosperity. They…
Because all the important ones have been true since 2022 and will be true forever, because they have nothing to do with LLM capabilities and instead are focused on LLM nature.
How do you figure? I can't see how any accounting gets it under 7 days (the LLM took 10 days to write the first version of the code), and the one I would use is closer to 2 months (time from conception to release). Not…
Because bad behavior tends to scale with company size, not because smaller companies are more virtuous, but because they just have less power to do harm than bigger companies. Imagine that there were only two companies,…