Localization of sound is primarily based on the time difference between the ears. Localization is also pretty precise, to within a few degrees under good conditions.
This wouldn't work well because in the frequency domain representation, different "pixels" have very different importance for the overall appearance of the image: The pixels at the center of the frequency domain…
Currently, they buy carbon offsets to be net-neutral. The goal is to buy carbon-neutral energy in the first place.
I think this persistent state is one of the main advantages of the notebook environment, or the Matlab workspace, which I guess it was inspired by. It allows you to quickly try alternative values for certain variables…
Minor point: What you describe isn't usually called working memory. Working memory is what you can "keep in mind" at any one point. It lasts for a few seconds and then has to be refreshed, e.g. by repeatedly saying a…
Sending before deducting the money seems like an obvious design flaw that should have raised red flags. Is there any explanation for why it was implemented this way, and why it wasn't spotted by the developers?
Localization of sound is primarily based on the time difference between the ears. Localization is also pretty precise, to within a few degrees under good conditions.
This wouldn't work well because in the frequency domain representation, different "pixels" have very different importance for the overall appearance of the image: The pixels at the center of the frequency domain…
Currently, they buy carbon offsets to be net-neutral. The goal is to buy carbon-neutral energy in the first place.
I think this persistent state is one of the main advantages of the notebook environment, or the Matlab workspace, which I guess it was inspired by. It allows you to quickly try alternative values for certain variables…
Minor point: What you describe isn't usually called working memory. Working memory is what you can "keep in mind" at any one point. It lasts for a few seconds and then has to be refreshed, e.g. by repeatedly saying a…
Sending before deducting the money seems like an obvious design flaw that should have raised red flags. Is there any explanation for why it was implemented this way, and why it wasn't spotted by the developers?