Its not there because a lot of the providers werent providing until recently, and higher spatial resolutions, referesh times and higher compute costs meant that no one used them in prod. We tried with ECMWF-AIFS however…
One is a AI company first, the other has tons of other services and they can just buy those outright.
Everytime someone is using httpx I always wonder why use that especially when niquests exists? I feel like it has always been such a better package
Also niquests as well which is a dropin replacement and imo wayyy better than httpx
idk man, we pay stupid amounts of money to microsoft, we are an enterprise customer, expecting better availablity compared to my laptop isnt really a high bar.
My company is not even the same ballpark, but even we already have people for it. And doesn't include the fact that you can get a colo location and just a MSP or a contractor to do it for you
For not being stuck at any shenanigans that might happen at East Croydon.
Its gatwick, 3 lines go here, one every 15 minutes. I have always taken the train to either Heathrow or Gatwick, there's always been more than enough space to accomodate luggage, idk what people here are on about.
>But in general now trend is to use normal databases from IT world in OT world to overcome some legacy solutions. Someone tell my company this please ;-;
Based on us keeping a replica of our AVEVA data archive in delta tables which are just parquets; and only compressing the parquets in LZ4 and getting a fuck ton of more space savings. I would say yes. Especially when…
Its not there because a lot of the providers werent providing until recently, and higher spatial resolutions, referesh times and higher compute costs meant that no one used them in prod. We tried with ECMWF-AIFS however…
One is a AI company first, the other has tons of other services and they can just buy those outright.
Everytime someone is using httpx I always wonder why use that especially when niquests exists? I feel like it has always been such a better package
Also niquests as well which is a dropin replacement and imo wayyy better than httpx
idk man, we pay stupid amounts of money to microsoft, we are an enterprise customer, expecting better availablity compared to my laptop isnt really a high bar.
My company is not even the same ballpark, but even we already have people for it. And doesn't include the fact that you can get a colo location and just a MSP or a contractor to do it for you
For not being stuck at any shenanigans that might happen at East Croydon.
Its gatwick, 3 lines go here, one every 15 minutes. I have always taken the train to either Heathrow or Gatwick, there's always been more than enough space to accomodate luggage, idk what people here are on about.
>But in general now trend is to use normal databases from IT world in OT world to overcome some legacy solutions. Someone tell my company this please ;-;
Based on us keeping a replica of our AVEVA data archive in delta tables which are just parquets; and only compressing the parquets in LZ4 and getting a fuck ton of more space savings. I would say yes. Especially when…