'Egoless' can mean a lot of different things. Here it seems to mean 'everything belongs to the corporations.'
The Wavefunction part is cool. One question, where does the probability go at long times?
I’ve had plenty of boiled hot dogs in the US. Not my fave but people do it. Maybe it’s a regional thing.
This bit of unhingery is where I gratefully leave HN.
Google's free AI responses are moving the bar on what I expect from search. But maybe not in the direction you think.
Or else there might be something called "other people's money."
TFA has data.
Sci-fi premise. Somewhere [1] there is a message board where developers openly celebrate those feelings of dislike and disdain toward users. On that board, silently deleting a user's files is obviously justified. What…
In some places it is more common to defend the abhorrent than to condemn it.
>A car is a half solution to going to work. A house is a half solution to sleeping indoors. Food is a half solution to hunger!
That does nothing to solve my real problem, which is too little surveillance.
Suggest doing it in the morning, before you leave for work.
Agreed, we can't legislate attitudes. So we need to prohibit the behavior. It's the same idea as shoplifting. Laws are the key.
If you don't have laws, or don't enforce them, people will do whatever they want. I can remember when this simple point was obvious to almost everyone.
>There is absolutely no reason to read those contracts any more For another perspective, check out the comment you're replying to.
Absolutely. First let's install an extreme surveillance state and give them full police power unlimited by the Constitution. Then, later, if we have any regrets, no problem. Just take the system to court and restore…
Seems clear that's begun in the US now.
Please be civil. Maybe you linked the wrong text by mistake. But what you linked is normal, constitutional US civics. Congress controls spending.
Your link confirms that the cuts are illegal.
Cuts must come from congress. Read Constitution.
It wasn't originally predatory, just insular, hysterical, and annoying.
No, it's just a description of what's happening online. If you've read similar descriptions before, that may be because more than one person is writing online.
My favorite comments here are the ones that go "What predatory cesspit?" and "The author of this article is the problem!" In other words, spending hours scrolling addictive, deceptive crap every day is healthy. The only…
>internet is just exposing how humans behave normally If humans behaved like that normally, then the internet wouldn't expose anything unusual. We'd see the behavior ... normally.
>This so exaggerated No, it's just what's happening online. >If you think some of the people you know are assholes, that's fine. If you think all of them are assholes, Wrong thread? Doesn't seem to correspond to…
'Egoless' can mean a lot of different things. Here it seems to mean 'everything belongs to the corporations.'
The Wavefunction part is cool. One question, where does the probability go at long times?
I’ve had plenty of boiled hot dogs in the US. Not my fave but people do it. Maybe it’s a regional thing.
This bit of unhingery is where I gratefully leave HN.
Google's free AI responses are moving the bar on what I expect from search. But maybe not in the direction you think.
Or else there might be something called "other people's money."
TFA has data.
Sci-fi premise. Somewhere [1] there is a message board where developers openly celebrate those feelings of dislike and disdain toward users. On that board, silently deleting a user's files is obviously justified. What…
In some places it is more common to defend the abhorrent than to condemn it.
>A car is a half solution to going to work. A house is a half solution to sleeping indoors. Food is a half solution to hunger!
That does nothing to solve my real problem, which is too little surveillance.
Suggest doing it in the morning, before you leave for work.
Agreed, we can't legislate attitudes. So we need to prohibit the behavior. It's the same idea as shoplifting. Laws are the key.
If you don't have laws, or don't enforce them, people will do whatever they want. I can remember when this simple point was obvious to almost everyone.
>There is absolutely no reason to read those contracts any more For another perspective, check out the comment you're replying to.
Absolutely. First let's install an extreme surveillance state and give them full police power unlimited by the Constitution. Then, later, if we have any regrets, no problem. Just take the system to court and restore…
Seems clear that's begun in the US now.
Please be civil. Maybe you linked the wrong text by mistake. But what you linked is normal, constitutional US civics. Congress controls spending.
Your link confirms that the cuts are illegal.
Cuts must come from congress. Read Constitution.
It wasn't originally predatory, just insular, hysterical, and annoying.
No, it's just a description of what's happening online. If you've read similar descriptions before, that may be because more than one person is writing online.
My favorite comments here are the ones that go "What predatory cesspit?" and "The author of this article is the problem!" In other words, spending hours scrolling addictive, deceptive crap every day is healthy. The only…
>internet is just exposing how humans behave normally If humans behaved like that normally, then the internet wouldn't expose anything unusual. We'd see the behavior ... normally.
>This so exaggerated No, it's just what's happening online. >If you think some of the people you know are assholes, that's fine. If you think all of them are assholes, Wrong thread? Doesn't seem to correspond to…