There are graphics, it's real-time, but you type commands to control the drones.
Has anybody worked out quantitatively whether the total dot-com boom was a decent investment in hindsight?
Does anybody know how much AI is earning?
How are the earnings different this time? Can you add any color to that?
Financial news tends to be written for people who can fill in a lot of blanks themselves.
How has CPR (or CPR data) changed since 2011? What type of medicine do you practice?
The subject in chemistry isn't theory. It's what actually happens in nature. Even immense levels of theory just don't close the gap.
>NOBODY IS ATTACKING YOU Somehow this captures a lot of the culture for me.
"Hostility as a feature" has been tried many times, from the old newsgroups of the late 80s to Quora and Stack Overflow. It tends to herald the death of the platform.
Spotify is even worse now. Now it keeps automatically playing stuff I dislike. Even though I'm paying them. (Wait, let me go fix that last problem at least.)
It needs votes. It is better than dealing directly with the corporations, which don't need votes.
>We are not going to see all the houses empty and all the households homeless. ... do you remember 2008? Or no? That was a tiny blip.
Bruh. This has nothing to do with like Elon coming and taking the house away. This is just plain old reality. Without income or savings, people can't afford houses. How would they pay the property taxes? Can't maintain…
Without jobs, and after our savings run out, we will be homeless people. Then, after that, we can try to bargain for ... whatever homeless people get in this society. It doesn't look like much to me. Call it 'basic…
If anyone else is unlucky enough to be reading this, please just scroll up to see what everyone actually said.
I'm sorry to say that you don't seem to have read either the thread or my comment. What you bring to the discussion is the straw-man argument that "wealth can be created, not only stolen." Nobody was disputing that.…
I read the comment chain above. I just went back and read it again. I question whether you've done the same.
Always the same straw man argument. Nobody here is arguing that wealth can't be created.
I support doctors. They're doing great work. I understand that in today's US I probably should have said that explicitly, as many Americans seem to have joined the side of the cancer, viruses, etc., and now oppose…
It does fly off sometimes in the game.
I'm ok that they left that part out.
In my comment I pointed out that "5 years" was a bit of an exaggeration compared to the results in the article (6 months). That seemed unfortunate to me. To me 5 years seems much better than 6 months.
Unfortunately in this particular case people die about 6 months later, not 5 years. See the article.
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S2-C3-1/...
A count of people.
There are graphics, it's real-time, but you type commands to control the drones.
Has anybody worked out quantitatively whether the total dot-com boom was a decent investment in hindsight?
Does anybody know how much AI is earning?
How are the earnings different this time? Can you add any color to that?
Financial news tends to be written for people who can fill in a lot of blanks themselves.
How has CPR (or CPR data) changed since 2011? What type of medicine do you practice?
The subject in chemistry isn't theory. It's what actually happens in nature. Even immense levels of theory just don't close the gap.
>NOBODY IS ATTACKING YOU Somehow this captures a lot of the culture for me.
"Hostility as a feature" has been tried many times, from the old newsgroups of the late 80s to Quora and Stack Overflow. It tends to herald the death of the platform.
Spotify is even worse now. Now it keeps automatically playing stuff I dislike. Even though I'm paying them. (Wait, let me go fix that last problem at least.)
It needs votes. It is better than dealing directly with the corporations, which don't need votes.
>We are not going to see all the houses empty and all the households homeless. ... do you remember 2008? Or no? That was a tiny blip.
Bruh. This has nothing to do with like Elon coming and taking the house away. This is just plain old reality. Without income or savings, people can't afford houses. How would they pay the property taxes? Can't maintain…
Without jobs, and after our savings run out, we will be homeless people. Then, after that, we can try to bargain for ... whatever homeless people get in this society. It doesn't look like much to me. Call it 'basic…
If anyone else is unlucky enough to be reading this, please just scroll up to see what everyone actually said.
I'm sorry to say that you don't seem to have read either the thread or my comment. What you bring to the discussion is the straw-man argument that "wealth can be created, not only stolen." Nobody was disputing that.…
I read the comment chain above. I just went back and read it again. I question whether you've done the same.
Always the same straw man argument. Nobody here is arguing that wealth can't be created.
I support doctors. They're doing great work. I understand that in today's US I probably should have said that explicitly, as many Americans seem to have joined the side of the cancer, viruses, etc., and now oppose…
It does fly off sometimes in the game.
I'm ok that they left that part out.
In my comment I pointed out that "5 years" was a bit of an exaggeration compared to the results in the article (6 months). That seemed unfortunate to me. To me 5 years seems much better than 6 months.
Unfortunately in this particular case people die about 6 months later, not 5 years. See the article.
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S2-C3-1/...
A count of people.