I feel linters are not that useful now, AI tend to not do that mistakes already. However there are some other issues like how do you architect, if a helper is needed or not, that no linter can flag. Other AI review…
we are working just like you described. AGENTS.md on every project, some skills that we maintain that we use as workflow (/create-tasks /plan /implement). About the harness we all use claude code, because it's easier…
[dead]
[flagged]
something that works well to me is trying to make very compact PRs, with just one intention, and not divagate into multiple ideas at the same time. also at my company we use Revix AI for reviews which do not remove the…
Nah, I don't think we are at this point yet. AI without control just creates non usable products. We don't literally write the code but we still give direction and review output. We just found the bottleneck moved to…
We keep human review because AI coding is not yet good enough. We use though an AI reviewer first, before the human even see the PR, that helps us filtering most of the bad code details so human don't lose time and…
What worked best for me is to start doing things by hand, trying to do the architecture and the standards I really want. Then, AI works really well on following my conventions. Therefore it gets easier if I want to…
Evidence is how precise the findings are, and how often people act on them. More comments are not evidence. Volume without action is just noise. We tried multiple AI Code reviewers and LLM based review bots and they are…
Agree that shared understanding is the hard part. Bugbots find bugs. Review is how the team stays aligned on the change. Visuals help a lot for that first pass. Another cause of burnout for us was noisy bot comments on…
we are using Revix AI, works really good on repos that already have some standards and patterns from good devs. the reviewer catches most of the things so when the senior reviews he just have to focus on more elevated…
At my team we added AI review because seniors were tired of always commenting on the same things, mostly because not everyone uses AI properly to produce production ready code. We tried coderabbit, qodo, and they all…
I feel linters are not that useful now, AI tend to not do that mistakes already. However there are some other issues like how do you architect, if a helper is needed or not, that no linter can flag. Other AI review…
we are working just like you described. AGENTS.md on every project, some skills that we maintain that we use as workflow (/create-tasks /plan /implement). About the harness we all use claude code, because it's easier…
[dead]
[flagged]
something that works well to me is trying to make very compact PRs, with just one intention, and not divagate into multiple ideas at the same time. also at my company we use Revix AI for reviews which do not remove the…
[dead]
Nah, I don't think we are at this point yet. AI without control just creates non usable products. We don't literally write the code but we still give direction and review output. We just found the bottleneck moved to…
We keep human review because AI coding is not yet good enough. We use though an AI reviewer first, before the human even see the PR, that helps us filtering most of the bad code details so human don't lose time and…
[flagged]
What worked best for me is to start doing things by hand, trying to do the architecture and the standards I really want. Then, AI works really well on following my conventions. Therefore it gets easier if I want to…
Evidence is how precise the findings are, and how often people act on them. More comments are not evidence. Volume without action is just noise. We tried multiple AI Code reviewers and LLM based review bots and they are…
Agree that shared understanding is the hard part. Bugbots find bugs. Review is how the team stays aligned on the change. Visuals help a lot for that first pass. Another cause of burnout for us was noisy bot comments on…
[dead]
[flagged]
we are using Revix AI, works really good on repos that already have some standards and patterns from good devs. the reviewer catches most of the things so when the senior reviews he just have to focus on more elevated…
At my team we added AI review because seniors were tired of always commenting on the same things, mostly because not everyone uses AI properly to produce production ready code. We tried coderabbit, qodo, and they all…