The vertical dividers should just be CSS anyway
> This is just harrassment [sic] against a right-wing media site Is Tesla a right-wing media site too? Vizio? Or did you just construct a narrative without knowing history?…
That's about 22.5% of the country, not half.
> That's why I used the word "sought" Trump sought to increase the legal responsibility of social media companies for what their users say, which would in effect silence and cancel users. Coincidentally right after…
> making the source code public (which AGPL does not require) That is completely false. If you read the article or the license before commenting you will understand why.…
> How could they have 'broke' the rules [sic] By violating the terms of the license. They have 30 days to remedy the violation, or their rights in the software are permanently terminated > and as far as I could tell, no…
If you'd heard about it, you wouldn't need someone else to find cites or links, I'm not that gullible. > Did not create new law Right, it had no effect, just more signalling from Trump. He sought to increase the legal…
You'd never even heard of the EO before today, so I understand why you're confused. Nothing ever went into effect, it would have run afoul of the First Amendment, and it made demands US gov agencies that are statutorily…
It made major headlines, I'm surprised you're so far out of the loop you never heard about it. The link to a Google search I provided for you makes it easy to find the EO:…
Trump sought to increase the legal responsibility of social media companies for what their users say, repealing protections under Section 230, thereby exposing them to lawsuits, which would in effect silence and cancel…
Oh wow, you really didn't know? https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/ex... https://books.google.com/books?id=B1MzEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA259#v=on...…
Trump signed an executive order to allow people to "silence and cancel" Twitter users after Twitter added a fact check to a single Tweet of his. Does that make him part of the Moderate Left or the Authoritarian Left?
It did say the beta was public "Truth Social hasn’t officially launched. But users could access a test version of the platform" > if you run AGPL code on a home server for personal use and someone hacks in No one hacked…
You've made a lot of comments about "blacks" for someone who doesn't "give a flying rat"
That or the art director thought it communicated the brand effectively. > the literal opposite of diversity Were you worried we'd think it was the figurative opposite if you didn't say "literal?"
And the reply in the other direction mentions Hunter Biden. I don't understand why! (We're still pretending we don't know that people are insinuating Snopes has a liberal bias right?) If Trump makes a huge number of…
Huh, the article where they say "Trump did not explicitly tell people to 'storm' or 'breach' or 'break into' the Capitol" and instead “peacefully and patriotically” march does't fit the mold of "pure, unadulterated…
That is false, and I linked to a new, different article, not a "retconned" one. They didn't change their stance, they criticize those that do, and reference a medical journal article from 1.5 years ago as evidence. As…
> I'm making no claims as to whether or not Snopes omits references Good, they clearly do not omit references, thanks for not challenging that! Snopes has debunked hundreds of liberal falsehoods. Same thing as your…
Right, you can tell by the publication date (it's in the URL), why I say "they reference a medical journal article from 1.5 years ago as evidence." What you said is not true, and their position hasn't shifted (they're…
> the logical fallacies are hurting my brain Like your "they don't omit references ever" straw man? "This one case" meaning one of the most significant and contested events of the US election? Surely their far-left…
Snopes didn't, they reference a medical journal article from 1.5 years ago as evidence. Which presumably you agree with...oops! [1] Back on topic: why didn't they omit those references and reasoning regarding the…
Remind me of their narrative again? They say that > "Trump did not explicitly tell people to 'storm' or 'breach' or 'break into' the [US] Capitol." and included the reasoning that > the president called on supporters to…
Really? So you think Trump was wearing his pants backwards at this rally? https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-wear-pants-backwards... Snopes says he wasn't, and shows evidence why. That's just "pure, unadulterated…
That or brand managers want branding. Do you have real-world examples of the hypothetical you invented?
The vertical dividers should just be CSS anyway
> This is just harrassment [sic] against a right-wing media site Is Tesla a right-wing media site too? Vizio? Or did you just construct a narrative without knowing history?…
That's about 22.5% of the country, not half.
> That's why I used the word "sought" Trump sought to increase the legal responsibility of social media companies for what their users say, which would in effect silence and cancel users. Coincidentally right after…
> making the source code public (which AGPL does not require) That is completely false. If you read the article or the license before commenting you will understand why.…
> How could they have 'broke' the rules [sic] By violating the terms of the license. They have 30 days to remedy the violation, or their rights in the software are permanently terminated > and as far as I could tell, no…
If you'd heard about it, you wouldn't need someone else to find cites or links, I'm not that gullible. > Did not create new law Right, it had no effect, just more signalling from Trump. He sought to increase the legal…
You'd never even heard of the EO before today, so I understand why you're confused. Nothing ever went into effect, it would have run afoul of the First Amendment, and it made demands US gov agencies that are statutorily…
It made major headlines, I'm surprised you're so far out of the loop you never heard about it. The link to a Google search I provided for you makes it easy to find the EO:…
Trump sought to increase the legal responsibility of social media companies for what their users say, repealing protections under Section 230, thereby exposing them to lawsuits, which would in effect silence and cancel…
Oh wow, you really didn't know? https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/ex... https://books.google.com/books?id=B1MzEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA259#v=on...…
Trump signed an executive order to allow people to "silence and cancel" Twitter users after Twitter added a fact check to a single Tweet of his. Does that make him part of the Moderate Left or the Authoritarian Left?
It did say the beta was public "Truth Social hasn’t officially launched. But users could access a test version of the platform" > if you run AGPL code on a home server for personal use and someone hacks in No one hacked…
You've made a lot of comments about "blacks" for someone who doesn't "give a flying rat"
That or the art director thought it communicated the brand effectively. > the literal opposite of diversity Were you worried we'd think it was the figurative opposite if you didn't say "literal?"
And the reply in the other direction mentions Hunter Biden. I don't understand why! (We're still pretending we don't know that people are insinuating Snopes has a liberal bias right?) If Trump makes a huge number of…
Huh, the article where they say "Trump did not explicitly tell people to 'storm' or 'breach' or 'break into' the Capitol" and instead “peacefully and patriotically” march does't fit the mold of "pure, unadulterated…
That is false, and I linked to a new, different article, not a "retconned" one. They didn't change their stance, they criticize those that do, and reference a medical journal article from 1.5 years ago as evidence. As…
> I'm making no claims as to whether or not Snopes omits references Good, they clearly do not omit references, thanks for not challenging that! Snopes has debunked hundreds of liberal falsehoods. Same thing as your…
Right, you can tell by the publication date (it's in the URL), why I say "they reference a medical journal article from 1.5 years ago as evidence." What you said is not true, and their position hasn't shifted (they're…
> the logical fallacies are hurting my brain Like your "they don't omit references ever" straw man? "This one case" meaning one of the most significant and contested events of the US election? Surely their far-left…
Snopes didn't, they reference a medical journal article from 1.5 years ago as evidence. Which presumably you agree with...oops! [1] Back on topic: why didn't they omit those references and reasoning regarding the…
Remind me of their narrative again? They say that > "Trump did not explicitly tell people to 'storm' or 'breach' or 'break into' the [US] Capitol." and included the reasoning that > the president called on supporters to…
Really? So you think Trump was wearing his pants backwards at this rally? https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-wear-pants-backwards... Snopes says he wasn't, and shows evidence why. That's just "pure, unadulterated…
That or brand managers want branding. Do you have real-world examples of the hypothetical you invented?