Who in this comment chain said they do that?
A closer analogy would be: If you make a food sample based on a description I gave you, and we typically agree not to record anything about either my description or your resulting recipe, and then you asked for…
I think that all your data proves, with 100% certainty, is that you can't extrapolate from a sample size of 1. It is very clear for many children that allowing them to gorge themselves on TV (or whatever) will not…
This is often pretty easy (depending on your circumstances) for a first child, and we mostly followed it for our first (but there was a little TV time as she approached 2, with shows selected by us as low intensity).…
Never letting a 3 year old watch any TV is a defensible position if you can manage it, but is definitely on the extreme end of actual practice.
Sorry for the nitpick, but ossification means the opposite of how you're using it here. It means existing structures / practices becoming frozen in place, by analogy with real ossification which is where flexible…
That is important or critical in some companies. But that's surely not what they meant by fitting their "mental model" better.
Another UX issue is that, for me, dragging up and down rotates the scene in the opposite direction than I expect. Even once I realised it, I found it really hard to control, like wearing mirror glasses.
That totally misses the point. No matter how surprising the output of the compiler's adaptive optimiser, the observable behaviour (except speed) of the program, when run, will be the same. That is clearly not true of…
That totally misses the point. No matter how surprising the output of the compiler's adaptive optimiser, its observable behaviour (except speed) will be the same. That is clearly not true of LLMs.
No, I explained that already in my comment. It was in an edit, maybe you drafted your reply before that: > The point is not that every explanation will be understood, but to at least demonstrate that there is a reason…
That directly contradicts the comment you're replying to, which said "firmly impose the rule". Your "I’m not forcing you to visit her" is clearly not that. You can tell the child that you understand why they might not…
Ah yes, I forgot that only vector can relocate elements. (Other containers can invalidate iterators but the objects themselves aren't moved.)
You are really stretching! You are so desperate to prove that emotional support is bad that you're trying anything. The reality of dirty clothes getting her bed dirty comes from physics, not me. Edit: As another…
Yesterday, my 3 year old daughter was very upset because she wanted to wear her very dirty top from the day to bed. I took exactly the approach described. I didn't scold her for being upset about something that doesn't…
That doesn't work if your library needs to handle these events somehow, not just transparently pass them around. Typically with your pattern, you'd use a switch statement on the event type, but what do you do if it's in…
They were referring to the comment they were replying to, which claimed that the original code was written (by humans) as poorly as AI does today. But AI today wouldn't write bugs that basic.
I followed the link near the start to the article about std::indirect<T>, which you can use instead of std::unique_ptr<T> for the pImpl idiom: [1] > Never null: it always holds a value, except in the moved-from state…
That doesn't work if you are writing a library where users of the library are able to implement their own event types. Even for a self-contained code base, it's a pain compared to a type that just works with any current…
X is different because it does have a business presence in the UK: UK advertisers
The higher price is perhaps not justified in the sense that the software could surely have been built in a simpler language for which more (cheaper) consultants were available to maintain it. i.e. today's consultant is…
Containers also give more efficient and simpler semantics if move constructors are noexcept, which they generally should be.
Absolutely agreed. If you really wanted to go down the author's route, then you'd at least make the constructor private, and have a static method that returns a valid constructed object or an error, so you never have…
Ah, the "big". That's some fun insider knowledge!
This is a terrible issue and completely unacceptable. But do I really need to read about it on Hacker News? This is not the place for that.
Who in this comment chain said they do that?
A closer analogy would be: If you make a food sample based on a description I gave you, and we typically agree not to record anything about either my description or your resulting recipe, and then you asked for…
I think that all your data proves, with 100% certainty, is that you can't extrapolate from a sample size of 1. It is very clear for many children that allowing them to gorge themselves on TV (or whatever) will not…
This is often pretty easy (depending on your circumstances) for a first child, and we mostly followed it for our first (but there was a little TV time as she approached 2, with shows selected by us as low intensity).…
Never letting a 3 year old watch any TV is a defensible position if you can manage it, but is definitely on the extreme end of actual practice.
Sorry for the nitpick, but ossification means the opposite of how you're using it here. It means existing structures / practices becoming frozen in place, by analogy with real ossification which is where flexible…
That is important or critical in some companies. But that's surely not what they meant by fitting their "mental model" better.
Another UX issue is that, for me, dragging up and down rotates the scene in the opposite direction than I expect. Even once I realised it, I found it really hard to control, like wearing mirror glasses.
That totally misses the point. No matter how surprising the output of the compiler's adaptive optimiser, the observable behaviour (except speed) of the program, when run, will be the same. That is clearly not true of…
That totally misses the point. No matter how surprising the output of the compiler's adaptive optimiser, its observable behaviour (except speed) will be the same. That is clearly not true of LLMs.
No, I explained that already in my comment. It was in an edit, maybe you drafted your reply before that: > The point is not that every explanation will be understood, but to at least demonstrate that there is a reason…
That directly contradicts the comment you're replying to, which said "firmly impose the rule". Your "I’m not forcing you to visit her" is clearly not that. You can tell the child that you understand why they might not…
Ah yes, I forgot that only vector can relocate elements. (Other containers can invalidate iterators but the objects themselves aren't moved.)
You are really stretching! You are so desperate to prove that emotional support is bad that you're trying anything. The reality of dirty clothes getting her bed dirty comes from physics, not me. Edit: As another…
Yesterday, my 3 year old daughter was very upset because she wanted to wear her very dirty top from the day to bed. I took exactly the approach described. I didn't scold her for being upset about something that doesn't…
That doesn't work if your library needs to handle these events somehow, not just transparently pass them around. Typically with your pattern, you'd use a switch statement on the event type, but what do you do if it's in…
They were referring to the comment they were replying to, which claimed that the original code was written (by humans) as poorly as AI does today. But AI today wouldn't write bugs that basic.
I followed the link near the start to the article about std::indirect<T>, which you can use instead of std::unique_ptr<T> for the pImpl idiom: [1] > Never null: it always holds a value, except in the moved-from state…
That doesn't work if you are writing a library where users of the library are able to implement their own event types. Even for a self-contained code base, it's a pain compared to a type that just works with any current…
X is different because it does have a business presence in the UK: UK advertisers
The higher price is perhaps not justified in the sense that the software could surely have been built in a simpler language for which more (cheaper) consultants were available to maintain it. i.e. today's consultant is…
Containers also give more efficient and simpler semantics if move constructors are noexcept, which they generally should be.
Absolutely agreed. If you really wanted to go down the author's route, then you'd at least make the constructor private, and have a static method that returns a valid constructed object or an error, so you never have…
Ah, the "big". That's some fun insider knowledge!
This is a terrible issue and completely unacceptable. But do I really need to read about it on Hacker News? This is not the place for that.