I am looking forward to LEO satellite networks that are connected to the Internet. Won't be easy to suppres yoir people then.
Just be happy that the first season happened, and look forward to Cyberpunk 2077.
It's not necessarily the amount of waste that is the problem, it's the incredibly long duration of its radioactivity. At some point we will need super long term storage, and it's true that there is no viable solution…
You are right about the waste, it really sucks. But I still feel like abandoning nuclear energy now would be incredibly bad timing, given the urgence of reducing our carbon footprint. It's kind of ok not have a 100k…
I agree. For me, the article absolutely did not deliver on what was said in the title. They declare efficiency as itself dangerous, where it is the narrow application of efficiency that really results in problens.
Sorry I did not mean you specifically. But the HN readers. And i meant the IPCC, not ICCP
If you are so critical of the big media, then don't read them! There is plenty of other information that comes directly from scientists and is written for policymakers so anyone on HN should understand it. For example:…
It makes sense to phrase it like that when politics worldwilde neglected the issue presumably hoping for best case scenarios.
I am looking forward to LEO satellite networks that are connected to the Internet. Won't be easy to suppres yoir people then.
Just be happy that the first season happened, and look forward to Cyberpunk 2077.
It's not necessarily the amount of waste that is the problem, it's the incredibly long duration of its radioactivity. At some point we will need super long term storage, and it's true that there is no viable solution…
You are right about the waste, it really sucks. But I still feel like abandoning nuclear energy now would be incredibly bad timing, given the urgence of reducing our carbon footprint. It's kind of ok not have a 100k…
I agree. For me, the article absolutely did not deliver on what was said in the title. They declare efficiency as itself dangerous, where it is the narrow application of efficiency that really results in problens.
Sorry I did not mean you specifically. But the HN readers. And i meant the IPCC, not ICCP
If you are so critical of the big media, then don't read them! There is plenty of other information that comes directly from scientists and is written for policymakers so anyone on HN should understand it. For example:…
It makes sense to phrase it like that when politics worldwilde neglected the issue presumably hoping for best case scenarios.
It makes sense to phrase it like that when politics worldwilde neglected the issue presumably hoping for best case scenarios.