The article says the company is already 74% female. If 62% female is more diverse than 50% just imagine how diverse a 100% female team would be. Diversity mathematics are tricky like that.
Google admits to being a search engine.
That no information exists is not a story.
Debian is the go to, they maintain niche architectures and ports almost to a fault.
>a whole coin As far as I know there's nothing special about 1.0 coin.
The choices of Arch/NixOS/FreeBSD are bizarre.
It's not that unusual to have a backup onion address, it doesn't mean they'll stay off the Web.
Familiar Linux came in GPE (Gnome) and OPIE (Qt) flavors.
Over made-up micro-regressions and gaps, no less. I'm not seeing a benefit to any of this.
They'll transfer the name elsewhere, it's a petty waste of time.
Apparently you haven't read a ToS/AUP before, choosing GoDaddy for anything the least bit controversial was a mistake.
My guess is an SJW was trying to make an example of Damore, the condemnations and soap-boxing came incredibly fast, this backfired obviously.
How do you make any business decisions when taking things this personally?
> it and made his company look bad This may have been a nuance James missed, Google is open to _external_ social woes.
His argument was the program was flawed by bad metrics and wouldn't accomplish its goals, not directed at an individual.
The article says the company is already 74% female. If 62% female is more diverse than 50% just imagine how diverse a 100% female team would be. Diversity mathematics are tricky like that.
Google admits to being a search engine.
That no information exists is not a story.
Debian is the go to, they maintain niche architectures and ports almost to a fault.
>a whole coin As far as I know there's nothing special about 1.0 coin.
The choices of Arch/NixOS/FreeBSD are bizarre.
It's not that unusual to have a backup onion address, it doesn't mean they'll stay off the Web.
Familiar Linux came in GPE (Gnome) and OPIE (Qt) flavors.
Over made-up micro-regressions and gaps, no less. I'm not seeing a benefit to any of this.
They'll transfer the name elsewhere, it's a petty waste of time.
Apparently you haven't read a ToS/AUP before, choosing GoDaddy for anything the least bit controversial was a mistake.
My guess is an SJW was trying to make an example of Damore, the condemnations and soap-boxing came incredibly fast, this backfired obviously.
How do you make any business decisions when taking things this personally?
> it and made his company look bad This may have been a nuance James missed, Google is open to _external_ social woes.
His argument was the program was flawed by bad metrics and wouldn't accomplish its goals, not directed at an individual.