I think it’s pretty unreasonable to use the service.
In what way are those two different? What makes the training data valuable if not to extract valuable information from it? They sure as hell don't need it just to produce English.
If he didn't opt out I'm not sure I'd agree that it was fair game. I'm pretty sure it would be considered plagiary amongst colleagues and it is a terrible precedent if we just let OpenAI steal any good idea they can get…
And in all reasonable circumstances the court would agree. Poisoning the water supply is an act of war let alone an illegal act of violence.
The most interesting part to me is the bike. I don't think any of them would actually work, but the mistakes feel somewhat human.
Some of its standards supersede national law (I think it was the regulations that did so, amd standards needed to be built into national law, could be the other way around). And this makes a lot of sense with rules…
If you don't lay down your own roads you can't own a bike.
That's a bit of a touchy subject that exposes the fact that the EU has repurposed a system for designing industry standards (not laws) and has a shaky legal foundation. To some extent countries are bound by EU law, but…
Seems like an excellent way to optimize yourself out of a job, both figuratively and literally. So no, I'm not going to assume that's what someone meant. I can at least pretend I consider people to be competent.
This is besides the point, but you do have to marvel at the technology it took to make this comment render just fine in HN.
I'd imagine Microsoft gave them pretty clear instructions to not let them know officially when they're bullying other companies on Microsoft's behalf.
I think all code is technical debt in a way. Good code is a necessary evil, bad code is more evil than necessary. Generating code automatically when you're not even quite sure what it is or even should be doing is…
Even if it adds some complication I really enjoy just having both features available when I need to. But then I'm a sucker for gadgets. In a way both provide answers to the question, what is that light? Performance is…
I also really like the star chart they added recently. Seems like a minor thing but it's just really handy to have it available for the few occasions you need it.
I think everyone just reads *illion and thinks 'lots of money'. The amounts are incomprehensible at this point. I don't think anyone can conceive of 13 billion dollars accurately, including the people brokering this…
I can spend an hour repairing my bicycle tire and get it working for a few years or I can buy several new tires by working more hours. If everyone did that we would need a lot more bicycle tires. Edit: If you want a…
Hard to tell, but if you were to replace anything when doing so would be cheaper I think people would be throwing away a lot more. If you want an economic argument there's no way to sell my free time for anywhere near…
You underestimate my willingness to 'under sell' my free time by spending it to fix something I own.
Is it? How would you test an answer? It is probably no coincidence that AI is exceedingly good at finding small counter examples. But for the Riemann hypothesis no such counter examples exist. And likely none exist.
A sense of which writing is better is the very thing that reading lots of books helps you discover. And I don't think only reading "quality" literature is necessary, you just need to not mindlessly read the same thing…
But less sad! Honestly the main problem is one of efficiency not whether buying happiness with money is a bad idea. Being less sad is more important than having money, but you do need to plan ahead so you don't run out…
When you put it like that it doesn't sound like the worst idea.
I'm starting to have the same problem with code. It's unbearable for some reason. It's like someone took the LinkedIn writing style and translated into a code style for code that has no business existing in the first…
For one they've already used the entire library genesis. Anything not in there is going to be obscure in some capacity.
Good point, why waste time deciphering old badly burnt scrolls when anything worthwhile should have been preserved.
I think it’s pretty unreasonable to use the service.
In what way are those two different? What makes the training data valuable if not to extract valuable information from it? They sure as hell don't need it just to produce English.
If he didn't opt out I'm not sure I'd agree that it was fair game. I'm pretty sure it would be considered plagiary amongst colleagues and it is a terrible precedent if we just let OpenAI steal any good idea they can get…
And in all reasonable circumstances the court would agree. Poisoning the water supply is an act of war let alone an illegal act of violence.
The most interesting part to me is the bike. I don't think any of them would actually work, but the mistakes feel somewhat human.
Some of its standards supersede national law (I think it was the regulations that did so, amd standards needed to be built into national law, could be the other way around). And this makes a lot of sense with rules…
If you don't lay down your own roads you can't own a bike.
That's a bit of a touchy subject that exposes the fact that the EU has repurposed a system for designing industry standards (not laws) and has a shaky legal foundation. To some extent countries are bound by EU law, but…
Seems like an excellent way to optimize yourself out of a job, both figuratively and literally. So no, I'm not going to assume that's what someone meant. I can at least pretend I consider people to be competent.
This is besides the point, but you do have to marvel at the technology it took to make this comment render just fine in HN.
I'd imagine Microsoft gave them pretty clear instructions to not let them know officially when they're bullying other companies on Microsoft's behalf.
I think all code is technical debt in a way. Good code is a necessary evil, bad code is more evil than necessary. Generating code automatically when you're not even quite sure what it is or even should be doing is…
Even if it adds some complication I really enjoy just having both features available when I need to. But then I'm a sucker for gadgets. In a way both provide answers to the question, what is that light? Performance is…
I also really like the star chart they added recently. Seems like a minor thing but it's just really handy to have it available for the few occasions you need it.
I think everyone just reads *illion and thinks 'lots of money'. The amounts are incomprehensible at this point. I don't think anyone can conceive of 13 billion dollars accurately, including the people brokering this…
I can spend an hour repairing my bicycle tire and get it working for a few years or I can buy several new tires by working more hours. If everyone did that we would need a lot more bicycle tires. Edit: If you want a…
Hard to tell, but if you were to replace anything when doing so would be cheaper I think people would be throwing away a lot more. If you want an economic argument there's no way to sell my free time for anywhere near…
You underestimate my willingness to 'under sell' my free time by spending it to fix something I own.
Is it? How would you test an answer? It is probably no coincidence that AI is exceedingly good at finding small counter examples. But for the Riemann hypothesis no such counter examples exist. And likely none exist.
A sense of which writing is better is the very thing that reading lots of books helps you discover. And I don't think only reading "quality" literature is necessary, you just need to not mindlessly read the same thing…
But less sad! Honestly the main problem is one of efficiency not whether buying happiness with money is a bad idea. Being less sad is more important than having money, but you do need to plan ahead so you don't run out…
When you put it like that it doesn't sound like the worst idea.
I'm starting to have the same problem with code. It's unbearable for some reason. It's like someone took the LinkedIn writing style and translated into a code style for code that has no business existing in the first…
For one they've already used the entire library genesis. Anything not in there is going to be obscure in some capacity.
Good point, why waste time deciphering old badly burnt scrolls when anything worthwhile should have been preserved.