Plus with more low precision compute… to help with the memory bandwidth!
How could it possibly be otherwise? Single core performance goes up every year, but not enough that this year’s 12-core CPU beats last year’s 18-core CPU at multithreaded benchmarks. This is “sad”?!? First world…
It was their eyeballs not drying out or squinting due to the wind for me.
Sounds like an eventual Supreme Court case.
What do you mean “projection”? The “we” they’re referring to are those who feel the same as them. It apparently doesn’t include you.
“Meet the new heart of your home”. Move over, hearts of the actual people in your home, and the love between them: we’ve got a new gadget.
Fuchsia is an “option”, although it doesn’t support much hardware without writing your own drivers.
So your position boils down to “the only real knowledge is that which is provable”. Tautological. And probably not self-consistent, given Gödel.
This feels like a very rigid ontology. I know what type of food my dog prefers. An executive assistant has intimate knowledge of their boss’s needs. Neither of these would become knowledge if they were written down for…
Thank you!
Is it? Sorry, skill issue I guess. I regularly use the Claude app on phone and laptop, and have never seen it produce non-text chat output.
The point, I think, is to make fun of Anthropic models, which answer only in text when you ask them how to do something. They’re the competition, not paper pamphlets.
Who was trying to make the US and China appear the same? I think you have reading comprehension problems, buddy. If you look at the comment I responded to, they were remarking on selective enforcement in the USA. I…
In a list describing how the USA system works, sure: selective enforcement is there. As a differentiator from the Chinese system, not so much. For two otherwise equal companies, the one that says things against the…
He may very well have been the first to coin that term!
Please reread. I am not making the claim that OpenAI is hypocritical. I am making the claim that the article headline is clickbait because it paints OpenAI as hypocritical for firing workers for using AI to do their…
Really? It’s clickbait because it paints OpenAI as hypocritical: “look they’re marketing AI as valuable, and they won’t even let their own people use it”. When in fact the job description is to not use AI.
So does Gödel. Maybe it was a joke? Unclear.
The article didn’t make it clear: the breakthrough is the discovery of a new third brain, beyond the two previously known.
Why is it ironic? Sounds like an honest question from someone who doesn’t know.
I think you’re conflating the direction of definition with the direction of evaluation. Compare the similarity of: AI(n) = improve(AI(n-1)) With: Fib(n) = Fib(n-1) + Fib(n-2) The latter is a classic example of…
“Recursive” is a reasonable term because the generation N AIs will train the Generation N+1 AIs. The term “iterative” doesn’t reflect this nuance as well IMO.
The risks of open models are real. However, I’d feel better about ceding control of AI to the government if they didn’t seem so intent on building an apparatus for surveillance/control. Your “furry fanfic” is a somewhat…
Neuromancer came out in 1984, over 40 years ago, so that covers the broad concept. Or Neo in The Matrix: “Programs hacking programs… why?” For non-fiction you could look at Nick Bostrom’s Superintelligence: Paths,…
I was under the impression that Go also uses Elo, then I did a bit of cursory research and discovers that it varies. Two major federations are American Go Association (AGA) and European Go Federation (EGF). EGF uses an…
Plus with more low precision compute… to help with the memory bandwidth!
How could it possibly be otherwise? Single core performance goes up every year, but not enough that this year’s 12-core CPU beats last year’s 18-core CPU at multithreaded benchmarks. This is “sad”?!? First world…
It was their eyeballs not drying out or squinting due to the wind for me.
Sounds like an eventual Supreme Court case.
What do you mean “projection”? The “we” they’re referring to are those who feel the same as them. It apparently doesn’t include you.
“Meet the new heart of your home”. Move over, hearts of the actual people in your home, and the love between them: we’ve got a new gadget.
Fuchsia is an “option”, although it doesn’t support much hardware without writing your own drivers.
So your position boils down to “the only real knowledge is that which is provable”. Tautological. And probably not self-consistent, given Gödel.
This feels like a very rigid ontology. I know what type of food my dog prefers. An executive assistant has intimate knowledge of their boss’s needs. Neither of these would become knowledge if they were written down for…
Thank you!
Is it? Sorry, skill issue I guess. I regularly use the Claude app on phone and laptop, and have never seen it produce non-text chat output.
The point, I think, is to make fun of Anthropic models, which answer only in text when you ask them how to do something. They’re the competition, not paper pamphlets.
Who was trying to make the US and China appear the same? I think you have reading comprehension problems, buddy. If you look at the comment I responded to, they were remarking on selective enforcement in the USA. I…
In a list describing how the USA system works, sure: selective enforcement is there. As a differentiator from the Chinese system, not so much. For two otherwise equal companies, the one that says things against the…
He may very well have been the first to coin that term!
Please reread. I am not making the claim that OpenAI is hypocritical. I am making the claim that the article headline is clickbait because it paints OpenAI as hypocritical for firing workers for using AI to do their…
Really? It’s clickbait because it paints OpenAI as hypocritical: “look they’re marketing AI as valuable, and they won’t even let their own people use it”. When in fact the job description is to not use AI.
So does Gödel. Maybe it was a joke? Unclear.
The article didn’t make it clear: the breakthrough is the discovery of a new third brain, beyond the two previously known.
Why is it ironic? Sounds like an honest question from someone who doesn’t know.
I think you’re conflating the direction of definition with the direction of evaluation. Compare the similarity of: AI(n) = improve(AI(n-1)) With: Fib(n) = Fib(n-1) + Fib(n-2) The latter is a classic example of…
“Recursive” is a reasonable term because the generation N AIs will train the Generation N+1 AIs. The term “iterative” doesn’t reflect this nuance as well IMO.
The risks of open models are real. However, I’d feel better about ceding control of AI to the government if they didn’t seem so intent on building an apparatus for surveillance/control. Your “furry fanfic” is a somewhat…
Neuromancer came out in 1984, over 40 years ago, so that covers the broad concept. Or Neo in The Matrix: “Programs hacking programs… why?” For non-fiction you could look at Nick Bostrom’s Superintelligence: Paths,…
I was under the impression that Go also uses Elo, then I did a bit of cursory research and discovers that it varies. Two major federations are American Go Association (AGA) and European Go Federation (EGF). EGF uses an…