I don't think they've screwed up Typekit at all.
An ugly website is one thing, there are millions, but an ugly website that has found an entirely new way to be ugly is impressive.
Ahh, right, i missed that. I was distracted from the sub-headings by the big bold responsive headings.
This is a really impressive effect, but I'd hesitate to use it as part of a generic cms backed site since the auto-sizing could inadvertently editorialize the meaning of a headline at different page widths. "Roddick…
I do not like language {X}, but I do like language {Y}. Everyone should agree to write in language {Y}, so that we can all pretend that language {X} does not exist, and maybe then browsers will just start using {Y}…
There are some fairly clear indicators from Adobe itself about the future of dreamweaver. Note what they say in the 'Code' section here: http://html.adobe.com/toolsandservices/ "We think there’s a need for a different…
I don't think they've screwed up Typekit at all.
An ugly website is one thing, there are millions, but an ugly website that has found an entirely new way to be ugly is impressive.
Ahh, right, i missed that. I was distracted from the sub-headings by the big bold responsive headings.
This is a really impressive effect, but I'd hesitate to use it as part of a generic cms backed site since the auto-sizing could inadvertently editorialize the meaning of a headline at different page widths. "Roddick…
I do not like language {X}, but I do like language {Y}. Everyone should agree to write in language {Y}, so that we can all pretend that language {X} does not exist, and maybe then browsers will just start using {Y}…
There are some fairly clear indicators from Adobe itself about the future of dreamweaver. Note what they say in the 'Code' section here: http://html.adobe.com/toolsandservices/ "We think there’s a need for a different…