Yes, and all the postulates have been evidenced and panned out.
You look at if the postulates are falsifiable. All the postulates from me have been evidenced or are falsifiable. The Copenhagen wavefunction collapse is unfalsifiable.
Nope it’s the opposite. The Copenhagen wavefunction collapse is untestable or unfalsifiable. With many words, every postulate has been tested and very verified. What more can you ask from a theory? Now objective…
Pretty much all physics for since forever has been about the ontological explanation of what’s happening. If you don’t want to subscribe to an ontological interpretation then that’s something new and the opposite of how…
I think you need both. In some situations one is bad and the other is great and vice versa.
That’s completely useless. The point is that we need full control over the full pipeline for security. If China invades Taiwan 70% of noting is still nothing.
No subsidies and government intervention aren’t bad things. Even Trump realise that.
Depression is related to biological health of the brain. People are exercising less leading to worse biological health of the brain. So you’d expect depression to be increasing.
Reinvesting doesn’t impact profits they are making. That’s not how it works
But your view of art is based on who you “think” made it. So if someone lies about who made the art your views on the art changed. That’s a strange position that doesn’t make sense to me.
Deleted stuff can easily be recovered. I think the full clean will remove the encryption keys hence making it unrecoverable.
Ideally you’d weightlifting a few days a week and do cardio in a few days. So it’s not an either or.
Paid holiday isn’t a work day
That’s what the article is saying but there is no way that maths out with legit long term sick.
You probably should test your fake scenarios before making claims on how what llms do. Why is it that almost every time someone makes a claim it turns out wrong when tested
A human requires sleep the update their mental model to use that learning years later. Take a human and prevent them from sleeping after covering a fact then years later they won’t know it.
If you want data to train a Llm, you might want human data for specific parts vs Llm.
I guess that’s the dead internet theory. People are trying to train llms using mt, but just training on itself.
Electric systems are 100% efficient at heat generation.
It’s pretty much impossible to buy half the books I want.
I think the key thing is to make people aware of the consequences of their choices. If people are completely aware of how much they are fucking up their life fine, that’s on them. Many people don’t realise just how much…
God your comments are soo horrible and toxic.
I’m pretty sure other experts are also saying that it’s due to a different way of measuring levels.
I had a product where I was doing accountancy ratios and it’s not that simple since you have lots of different source data to use and it was such a nightmare to combine everything in the right way. Ai did that easily.…
That’s wrong. Only if the studies are powerful enough and are looking at the right stuff can you make any reasonable conclusions. If the studies are powerful enough then that absolutely isn’t evidence of absence at all.
Yes, and all the postulates have been evidenced and panned out.
You look at if the postulates are falsifiable. All the postulates from me have been evidenced or are falsifiable. The Copenhagen wavefunction collapse is unfalsifiable.
Nope it’s the opposite. The Copenhagen wavefunction collapse is untestable or unfalsifiable. With many words, every postulate has been tested and very verified. What more can you ask from a theory? Now objective…
Pretty much all physics for since forever has been about the ontological explanation of what’s happening. If you don’t want to subscribe to an ontological interpretation then that’s something new and the opposite of how…
I think you need both. In some situations one is bad and the other is great and vice versa.
That’s completely useless. The point is that we need full control over the full pipeline for security. If China invades Taiwan 70% of noting is still nothing.
No subsidies and government intervention aren’t bad things. Even Trump realise that.
Depression is related to biological health of the brain. People are exercising less leading to worse biological health of the brain. So you’d expect depression to be increasing.
Reinvesting doesn’t impact profits they are making. That’s not how it works
But your view of art is based on who you “think” made it. So if someone lies about who made the art your views on the art changed. That’s a strange position that doesn’t make sense to me.
Deleted stuff can easily be recovered. I think the full clean will remove the encryption keys hence making it unrecoverable.
Ideally you’d weightlifting a few days a week and do cardio in a few days. So it’s not an either or.
Paid holiday isn’t a work day
That’s what the article is saying but there is no way that maths out with legit long term sick.
You probably should test your fake scenarios before making claims on how what llms do. Why is it that almost every time someone makes a claim it turns out wrong when tested
A human requires sleep the update their mental model to use that learning years later. Take a human and prevent them from sleeping after covering a fact then years later they won’t know it.
If you want data to train a Llm, you might want human data for specific parts vs Llm.
I guess that’s the dead internet theory. People are trying to train llms using mt, but just training on itself.
Electric systems are 100% efficient at heat generation.
It’s pretty much impossible to buy half the books I want.
I think the key thing is to make people aware of the consequences of their choices. If people are completely aware of how much they are fucking up their life fine, that’s on them. Many people don’t realise just how much…
God your comments are soo horrible and toxic.
I’m pretty sure other experts are also saying that it’s due to a different way of measuring levels.
I had a product where I was doing accountancy ratios and it’s not that simple since you have lots of different source data to use and it was such a nightmare to combine everything in the right way. Ai did that easily.…
That’s wrong. Only if the studies are powerful enough and are looking at the right stuff can you make any reasonable conclusions. If the studies are powerful enough then that absolutely isn’t evidence of absence at all.