@ikirigin Fourdiamond? http://twitter.com/dcurtis/status/21598768075 @dcurtis 2 char is better than 3. Also, their logo is a diamond http://j.mp/bsF5F3 (◊ = option-shift-v) http://twitter.com/ikirigin/status/21599774307
Like I said... "once deployed at scale." Their system is in closed beta.
None of those are ubiquitous. I'm describing the network effect, making this quite relevant. Also, I'm pretty sure some of those do charge 30% regardless. Apple takes 30%. Needing to enter only a password to pay for…
Actually the numbers could be much, much better than 2X. But your last point about the risk of a changing playfor is very valid. In the case of payments, I'd bet for a conservative initial system that gets more flexible…
Anyone who calls fb credits a "tax" knows nothing about payments. A ubiquitous payment system where users are already authenticated could easily double conversion rates once deployed at scale. 30% off of 2X is a great…
@ikirigin Fourdiamond? http://twitter.com/dcurtis/status/21598768075 @dcurtis 2 char is better than 3. Also, their logo is a diamond http://j.mp/bsF5F3 (◊ = option-shift-v) http://twitter.com/ikirigin/status/21599774307
Like I said... "once deployed at scale." Their system is in closed beta.
None of those are ubiquitous. I'm describing the network effect, making this quite relevant. Also, I'm pretty sure some of those do charge 30% regardless. Apple takes 30%. Needing to enter only a password to pay for…
Actually the numbers could be much, much better than 2X. But your last point about the risk of a changing playfor is very valid. In the case of payments, I'd bet for a conservative initial system that gets more flexible…
Anyone who calls fb credits a "tax" knows nothing about payments. A ubiquitous payment system where users are already authenticated could easily double conversion rates once deployed at scale. 30% off of 2X is a great…