20 comments

[ 2.5 ms ] story [ 35.5 ms ] thread
And here I am in Canada without a car. At least weed is legal.
well, I suppose if you were immodest you could just use the stall..

i'm not sure the prostitute would be too thrilled.

Here we are in a world that supposedly treasures the ability of consenting adults to do whether we want yet paid sex is still illegal and in fact being restricted further in places it was formerly allowed.
No the "world" (ruling class) never treasured that.
That's a fair take, but I don't think it really applies to the article: almost all of the countries mentioned in it have prostitution some flavor of legalized via Abolitionism or Legalization (Germany, the Netherlands, Switzerland) or Neo-Abolitionism (Sweden).

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_Europe

> Generally facilities are designed so that the driver cannot exit the vehicle after pulling into the structure, but the prostitute can.

How?

Sounds to me like it's just spacing? Like pulling into a small parking space, where you have to park the drivers side in a way the door can't open...
Maybe a hump running down the middle of each stall, but offset toward the left, so when pulling in, the driver door is very close to the wall?

I had the same question, and am wondering what prevents someone from backing in

One idea: Provide stalls that are just large enough for a single car to fit with a gap of 1m between the stalls. Put a hole in the wall on the passenger side where the doors would be so that they open into the hole and allow someone on the passenger side to exit into the gap.
Make it narrow enough that when a car is inside, only one door can open? So either it’s the passenger door, so the prostitute can get in and out, or it’s the driver door, in which case she can’t get in in the first place?
Is this really appropriate for Hacker News, a news site for software engineering
Maybe German software engineers have to use sex boxes a lot?
Please don't.
Understood, we can't even have humorous conjecture about why sex boxes might be related to hackers. _You_ can post about sex boxes, and let material like that pass, but any similarly baudy comments to it: oh no!

I'm not interested in sticking within the personal tastes and pearl clutching limits of what 'dang' thinks people should talk about. What they should say. What is 'proper' for them to type according to dang's orthodoxy. My mind and mouth ain't your property, cunt.

Dang is a typical pathetic tinpot modictator piece of shit. Probably some otherwise profoundly unrespected, weak, unfuckable and ugly individual who's enjoying their little fief where "you have to do what I say now!".

I couldn't give the slightest flying fuck what dang thinks is OK speech. Dang can go and fuck him or her self, in a sex box or otherwise. Dang's thoughts, beliefs, attitudes, and opinion are worthless dogshit, with as much authority or credibility of that of a common street bum.

You Californian tech elite think you're going to get away establishing a 1st amendment free public square in which you unilaterally control what everyone can say, according to your personal whims and tastes. I submit you're all one day going to find yourselves severely mistaken in a _very ugly way_.

Go fuck yourself, maggot. Do me the favour of deleting my account now thanks so I don't get tempted to come back and waste more time mocking you for being a tinpot piece of shit.

Please do!

(comment deleted)
The irony is that with your second comment you confirmed dang was right about your first one.
How bad must these people feel about themselves after though. Driving out to some seedy "sex box" to pay to have uncomfortable car sex. The self disgust on the drive back must really be something lol.