HN Explorer

81 comments

[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 176 ms ] thread
graddrisrp
I'd rather avoid macos gui system as much as possible IMHO
saagarjha
That’s unfortunately a problem for people who use macOS.
fimdomeio
does anyone know of similar tools for linux?
fit2rule
This also works on Linux.

Edit: my mistake, no it doesn't. Apologies.

mumphster
where do you see that? theres not even code in this repo, and the only release is a dmg file
rjstelling
It's not open source yet, but I am planning on making it so. Watch this space. In the mean time I'm open to feedback and bug reports via GitHub issues.
fit2rule
Right there in the demo, Ubuntu windows.

Edit: never mind, my apologies. It's the dark theme of Mac OS.

rjstelling
Once SwiftUI is available on Linux, Suitcase will "just work". But don't hold your breath.
guessbest
"Xdialog is designed to be a drop in replacement for the "dialog" or "cdialog" programs. It converts any terminal based program into a program with an X-windows interface. The dialogs are easier to see and use while adding even more functionalities (e.g. with the treeview, the file selector, the edit box, the range box, the help button/box). Because Xdialog uses GTK+, it will also match your desktop theme."

http://xdialog.free.fr/

Aloha
I dont think Xdialog is maintained anymore, dialog is though.
fungos
there is also kdialog
hawski
Tcl/Tk is like this up to eleven (in positive sense).
ysleepy
Zenity is a classic example.
KMnO4
Awesome, I welcome any tools that simplify the GUI deployment process.

I've built quite a collection of scripts that clean and process my company's domain-specific data. I once needed to share that with a data-scientist/computer-Luddite (sadly too common) who wasn't comfortable running CLI scripts. The solution I came up with used Platypus[0] to generate a lovely app wrapper where files could be dragged in.

[0]: https://github.com/sveinbjornt/Platypus

dimator
I've used this to create a little muxer for opening URLs, which routes some to safari and some to Firefox, based on domain. Platypus allows to associate the app as a URL handler with the OS, which is very nice.
k2enemy
Very cool. Just a suggestion for the demos in the README though. Maybe have the code shown statically, then a gif of the GUI. Watching all the typing gets long when I just want to see the resulting GUI.
oefrha
Also, move at least one screenshot/cast to the top, not after tons of technical documentation.
kirstenbirgit
Yep, there's zero reason for the gifs. They seem really slow to me. Makes it impossible to copy the code if I wanted to, as well.
sbarre
The code is on the page, in text, directly below the GIF, if you want to copy it.

The GIFs help, they should just start with the code getting pasted in, not typed in.

nfin
and clicking the gif gives you a skippable video
azinman2
Except there are several videos and no need for me to click each one to find out what the output eventually looks like.
zapzupnz
Taking me to another website to look at the same clip — and then make me skip to the end myself and then manage having to pause the video — is lipstick on a pig.

A JPEG will be just fine.

rjstelling
Thanks for the feedback, I've improved the Readme file and broken it into several pages.

I'm also going to add shorter videos at the top.

zapzupnz
Not shorter vids. Pictures.
azinman2
I'm fine with a gif.. because the whole thing could be like 3 seconds long.
zapzupnz
The only thing we need to see is the outputted user interface. Everything else is superfluous.
mszmszmsz
Waiting for the gifs to show the output Drives. Me. Nuts.
rankam
Ok I feel like an idiot, but where is the code in the repo that produces the GUI - ie where is the Suitcase code?
rozab
I guess it isn't open source ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Strange how GitHub has apparently become the default distribution platform
mikestew
EDIT: okay, I'm the idiot for not actually opening the source archive and verifying that there's anything in there worth looking at.

You aren't the idiot in this equation. Inexplicably, the source can be found in zip or tar format on the download page:

https://github.com/Impedimenta/Suitcase/releases/tag/1.0.0-a...

de_watcher
Holy hell, the source archive is huge.

I just saw how that the demo is slow to boot and wanted to see the horror of the code.

Ok no, there is no code in the archive. Only images.

karkisuni
The "source code" zip has the same files as in the repo. No source.
choward
Yes, you're an idiot for thinking a project on GitHub is open source.

What a lame use of GitHub. Can I get the minute back I wasted reading that readme?

crad
Neat, but "instantly" is a bit much. How about quickly? :-p
de_watcher
I just need to know why that garbageware is so slow. Show me the code! :)

What happened to the good old days of 'wish' and friends?

booi
Instant oatmeal takes 2 minutes so the term already has no meaning
turnipla
All of that doesn’t seem to belong on to CLI flags. I love the possibilities this opens up, but I’d much rather write a configuration file.
Jaxan
Or you use suitcase to make a GUI for this tool ;-)
booi
Or make a separate tool that is a GUI to generate the config. We’ll call it metacase
robinhouston
Who else remembers Commando in the Macintosh Programmer’s Workshop? That was a long time ago, but then the world moved in a different direction. It’s interesting that this sort of thing has been out of fashion for so long. I wonder if it will come back.
ruffrey
Cool, but needs a license.
danpalmer
As the source code isn't actually available I've opened a GitHub issue to clarify whether this is deliberate, or to track the adding of the code.

https://github.com/Impedimenta/Suitcase/issues/4

tptacek
The author was on this thread an hour before you posted this clarifying that it is not yet open source, so you could delete that Github issue.
jakear
Why not have an issue tracking it? The author will likely close the issue themselves when they open source it.
rjstelling
Thanks for this. My plan is to open source it eventually, but I just ran out of time to get it into shape for launch day. I've removed the PR comment so as not to confuse any more people.
evandena
Anyone know something similar to this, but with help generating a web front end? I'd love to generate a small UI for my team to help with openssl commands, being able to input data would be a bonus.

I could probably cook something up with node fairly fast, but I'm a remedial programmer.

nathancahill
See also, Hammerspoon for an open source project that does this.
tambourine_man
Really nice. Reminds me of Platypus[1].

I don't really use GitHub but, if possible, please change the GIFs to MP4. Besides being sharper and way smaller, one can control the playback to rewind/fast forward.

[1] https://sveinbjorn.org/platypus

mkchoi212
Really cool but I’m wondering why have the user input args in as a command line arg? Seems very arduous and shell is just... shell. IMO, I would love something like this

`> suitecase my_layout.yaml`

hawski
Maybe you could start a script with a shebang. Call it something more descriptive like a Windowing Shell - wish for short. Put it on top of a command language and make whole thing cross-platform.
rjstelling
Please open an issue, I'd love to hash out what that might look like.
lxe
This new trend on HN of CLI tools controlled through a ton of CLI arguments... Why not pass a config/yaml/json/xml file/stdin?
wildmusings
Does anyone know of something like this for Windows? Would be nice to build a small UI around some powershell scripts I have, without having to resort to a full WinForms application.
goostavos
Shameless plug: checkout Gooey. Works on Win/OSX/Linux

While it won't bootstrap your GUI straight from powershell, it can give you a pleasant GUI that calls your powershell stuff with just a few lines of Python (no actual GUI code required!) ^_^

https://github.com/chriskiehl/Gooey

dvno42
Wow. This this is a really impressive project. Thanks for sharing!
macintux
I wish that supported Click. Very cool.
wildmusings
A python dependency is unfortunately out of the question for me, but that is a really cool project.
gardaani
Mac Quick Actions and Automator can be used for the simplest cases. I've build several file processing Quick Actions, which I can run by pressing buttons in Finder.

https://support.apple.com/guide/automator/use-quick-action-w...

tedmiston
Wow, this is awesome, and surprisingly easy to use.

I'd been looking for a simple way to run command like uptime or to get battery info not in the menu item without launching a terminal. Thank you.

pkamb
macOS Quick Actions (formerly called Services) are great, but I've always found them very cumbersome to use due to being relegated to the submenu. And having no icons, and a severe lack of customization and control over their order.

I recently released an indie Mac app to bring your Applications and Scripts to the top of the Finder right-click menu, customized exactly how you like.

https://servicestation.menu/

It's on the Mac App Store and uses the modern Finder Extension API, so safe to install and no Finder haxies.

miles
One of the major features Service Station advertises is "Open Terminal by right-clicking the Finder!", but isn't this functionality already available in macOS via System Preferences > Keyboard > Shortcuts > Services > checking "New Terminal at Folder" under "Files and Folders"?

A feature that might make Service Station even more useful would be adding "New Text File" and "Rich Text Document" options, similar to the app "New File Menu"[0].

This is the second time today[1] I've seen a closed source project hosted at GitHub[2]; I had mistakenly assumed GitHub was for open source projects (like SourceForge).

[0] https://apps.apple.com/us/app/new-file-menu/id1064959555?mt=...

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23020258

[2] https://github.com/knurling/ServiceStation/

saagarjha
Service Station pulls services out of the submenu and directly into the top level context menu, using a Finder extension.
miles
Ah - thank you for explaining that. I have so few services enabled that “New Terminal at Folder” is in the top level of my context menu.
pkamb
"New Terminal at Folder" does work if you right-click a folder... but NOT if you right-click the background of a Folder you already have open. That's the primary way I want to open Terminal.

But more importantly it's the UX difference between these two images:

https://imgur.com/a/pt3yQ2q

You can definitely already launch applications and scripts in macOS via "Open With" or the "Services" submenus.

Service Station moves them to the top of your right-click menu, gives them icons, and lets you completely customize the menu including targeting menus to show for only very specific selected file types.

miles
> But more importantly it's the UX difference between these two images: https://imgur.com/a/pt3yQ2q

Thanks for explaining the difference. I have so few services enabled that “New Terminal at Folder” is in the top level of my context menu[0], hence my misunderstanding.

[0] https://imgur.com/ZrHVSPA

pkamb
Built in "New File" functionality is definitely on the to-do list, and a very popular request from Windows users.

Running a support/issues website on GitHub without hosting the code is perhaps slightly weird, but it has been working well for me. GitHub does not mandate any licensing requirement.

[dead] williesleg
Nice that you did the needful! Thank you!
ibdf
Can this handle user inputs?
codeisawesome
As of now this is not actually open source - though that’s the default expectation of a repository being on GitHub. I don’t like the pattern of doing that because I feel GitHub will become a very slick SourceForge.

One more experience like this and I’ll uninstall the GitHub apps from my devices because I can’t trust them to not be warez themselves or some sort.

slantyyz
This will date me, but when I think of Suitcase for the Mac, I think of the font manager application that predated OSX... which surprisingly, still exists.[1]

[1] https://www.extensis.com/suitcase-fusion

EricE
I’ll just add that I liked Font/DA mover. Need to set up a laser printer? That’s your tool! (what we tolerated because we didn’t have better at the time - yikes!)