Ask HN: How would I send 1 dollar to everyone on Earth?

61 points by paulluuk ↗ HN
Let's assume that:

  * I am a billionaire with 8 billion dollars on my bank account
  * There are 8 billion humans on Earth
  * Around 6 billion of those humans have a bank account
  * I would like to send 1 dollar to every human on Earth
How would I go about doing this?

Some challenges that I believe I'd face:

  1. Getting the bank account numbers of the people who already have a bank account
  2. Getting 1 dollar to people who don't have a bank account
  3. Verifying that I'm not sending 1 dollar to the same person several times
  4. Building or finding some kind of service that makes sure I don't have to do 8 billion manual transfers
  5. Making sure I don't break any international laws in the process
  6. How do we handle children?
Some ideas for how to perhaps deal with these challenges:

  1. Create a website where I promise to send money if you send me your bank account -- doesn't sound shady at all.
  2. Use the same website to also allow people to send their address instead of a bank account number, and then simply send 1 dollar through regular mail? How would postal services in poor or corrupt countries deal with this, once they know there are millions of dollars being sent through the mail?
  3. No idea.
  4. Would a simple script that iterates over 8 billion rows and sends Stripe commands do the trick?
  5. Am I allowed to send money to North Korea? What happens if I send money to a known terrorist? No idea.
  6. No idea.

105 comments

[ 4.3 ms ] story [ 185 ms ] thread
Interesting challenge. Sounds like you will need a bit more than 8 billion for all the logistics involved.
It's probably 8 billion dollars to build a solution for a single large country.
Donate the money to an organization fighting climate change. It's the closest you will get to an equitable distribution.

Or, if you want to distribute it as regressive as possible: burn all your money. This will lower inflation and people will benefit in proportion to their spending.

Interesting. How would deflation affect people with zero or negative assets, though?
How will one of these organizations "fight" climate change? I think the only solution to climate change is American ingenuity, private-sector technology.
Director will stop using his SUV to go to work and won’t heat his residence in winter anymore (no need in tropical islands).
The latter proposal is a good one, if you first buy up currency from every country in proportion to the population.

It may not be as regressive as it appears at first blush: the impoverished hold cash as a greater proportion of their net worth than many of the wealthy.

Let me help you to clarify step 1:

Make a disposable $8,000,000,000.

build something globally accessible that provides at least one dollar in value, that's the only way I can think to overcome most of the hurdles you face with currency.

(maybe you can even do that cheaper than 8b.)

Easy: get everyone on earth to sign up for Stripe connect on your platform 1dollarforyouandyouandyou…com and then API the shiznit outta that thing.
"1. Create a website where I promise to send money if you send me your bank account -- doesn't sound shady at all."

Strange for an American perhaps, not for an European, i give and receive payments to my bank account routinely thanks to my IBAN; and it's safe.

p.s.: can you send money?

Yeah but you wouldn't just send it to a random offering you money - that's Nigerian prince territory.
I could publish it on my website for donations, what difference would it make?
I had this idea for a world crypto where everyone would start with the same amount... the biggest challenge that I saw was how to verify identities so that no-one could claim other's crypto.
Have you considered building a device that will scan people's retinas, then recruiting volunteers to deploy it around the world?
seems really expensive... there must be a better way
Can you make a retina scanner good enough that it recognizes a retina correctly with 99.999999% accuracy? Retinas can change, get damaged.
You enter into a contract with each national government. It obviously won't be perfect, but I doubt any other method will be better.
Nice one!

Reducing 8 billion problems to 195 problems.

Additionally, some further improvements are possible. Eg. Redirecting to the EU, instead of associated countries.

This is the most likely route I can think of which could actually work
There are some countries for which it might conceivably work (presuming you also pay a lot extra to cover the costs of the project), many for which it might nearly work, and several for which it absolutely won't.
The problem then becomes that some of those dollars end up going to one person rather than 10 million people, and government effectiveness at distributing the money across their population is inversely correlated with where the people that would benefit most from receiving a dollar live (this correlation exists within populations of countries with good banking systems too: your working person that wouldn't pick a dollar up if they saw it on the street probably gets a dollar automatically paid to them via the same system they receive tax rebates from, but many homeless people don't)
There will also be overhead fees ( eg. Banking) which need to be concluded in.

Either way, some of that money will always end with different people ( banks or persons).

25% overhead fee would be the extreme minimum due to the small amount per person.

But why would the national governments agree to do this? Most people wouldn't really care if they got a dollar or not so I expect that there wouldn't be overwhelming public pressure for most governments to do this, and the governments would correctly think that doing this would be more trouble than it is worth.
Drones with cameras and facial recognition. And a “money gun” that shoots a dollar at every new person it sees
Those who are desperate could start swapping wigs and prosthetics to fool the image recognition system. They'd shoot down the drones and take all of the money.
Subcontract. Put out a call for tenders for other people to deliver the money in particular countries, or regions, or to particular demographics within regions. Choose the proposals which are satisfactorily reliable and at the cheapest price.

There probably isn't a systematic way to get a dollar to everyone on earth. A mechanism which which works in the US won't necessarily work in India, Western Sahara, or the Netherlands. The best way to find a mechanism suited to local conditions is to get people with local knowledge to select it.

I'd be interested to see the proposal for North Sentinel Island.

I will bite. Using the postal service.

Send an physical envelope with 1$ for every address in the countries that are not banned in your jurisdiction, assuming x people per household.

Not everybody has an address, and other errors (how many people per address, cost of postage) but I think this would have less errors, would be cheaper and less prone to abuse than any alternative I can imagine.

Another option is providing the value for that money to everybody by doing something with it, and saving in all the logistics.

One last option, that requires government cooperation. Give 1$ to everybody after they vote.

During the pandemic the US government tried to send money to just its own citizens, this was generally successful, but plagued by a ton of fraud. I don't think any organization has the capacity to get close to the goal of sending $1 to every human on earth. Also, the US is able to enforce its laws on dollar transactions happening outside its borders, so sending money into countries the US has sanctioned will be very difficult from most places.
Entrust 8 million people with solving the problem locally for their 1,000. Expect fraud.
Worldcoin (cofounded by Sam Altman) is trying to do this. They plan to have contractors do eyeball scanning of everyone as identification.
And it worked just as we all expected: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/richardnieva/worldcoin-...

Note that it was months ago, now it's probably even worse with all scams being exposed and general downturn of the pyramid schemes.

I honestly don't get how people like Sam Altman still have any semblance of reputation after investing in that crap. Could something look any more transparently dystopian?
What about people without eyeballs?
This cannot be done for anywhere near your $8b. You need many times that amount of money just to handle some of the problems.

If you are willing to miss some people this is likely the best solution possible. Establish a very large NGO with offices in every country in the world. You'll need enough people to cover the entire planet at the same time - and then setup desks where everyone can come in, get their dollar, and get their left hand stamped with an ink that cannot be washed off in less than a day. This is what countries do to prevent duplicate votes.

And this won't get everyone, but it should prevent most duplications.

“Establish a very large NGO with offices in every country in the world”

This reminded me of what the non profit Stellar Development Foundation (SDF) is trying to do with Anchors around the world.

https://stellar.org/blog/stellar-anchor-basics-webinar-recap

Yeah, in practicality you'd want to partner with different existing NGOs (or even governments) depending on the country (some countries can reach almost every single person via a church, for example).

You'd also run into the opposite problem in some countries like the US; I don't know if I could be arsed to walk down the block for a dollar. Maybe if it was a cool limited-edition dollar coin or something.

I think the overhead of proving individuals don’t get more than a dollar would wind up costing more than the money itself.

I think the lowest overhead way would be to set up a couple thousand booths around the world simultaneously where people could come to get their dollar in exchange for staining their fingers with “election ink”. Would make it pretty difficult though not impossible to double dip.

In many developed and developing countries, you could likely work with the state and build it into their taxation schemes.
You also need to account for exchange rate and processing fees. Some recipients may not receive 1 dollar.

Edit0: Also, I just realised, many poor people do not have means to exchange dollar into their local currency. So sending them 1 dollar through post is going to be a waste.

Edit1: Most countries will not allow this due to hawala which creates black money.

(comment deleted)
How many $1 bills are even in circulation?
At the risk of been downvoted: you cant. It is impossible.

Even if you had $30 billion, and your goal was to guarantee the distribution of only $1 to everyone, it still wouldnt occur with all the excess.

When you factor in corruption, fraud, inadequate infrastructure, and vague defining of the parameters.

Just think of the edge cases to understand why this couldnt be achieved:

1. A subset of the population will ACTIVELY reject your attempt to give them $1, as they will consider it spam, anti-god, conspiracy or one of hundreds of other reasons (look at recent world events to see that there is always a % of the pop on the other side)

2. A subset of the population will ACTIVELY attempt to fraud you for extra money. Claim multiple times, or claim on behalf of other people (their dead grandmother)

3. A subset of the population will ACTIVELY use corruption for extra money. Consider state actors such as North Korera, or third world countries with poor controls

I could go on - but those 3 reasons alone are enough edge cases to start with.

Not to mention having to keep going because babies are born and the money can't be delivered instantaneously...
Not to mention getting anything into the hands of off-the-grid homesteading hermits – or even finding them to begin with.

(Or getting a buck into the hands of every Sentinelese)

> Sentinelese

I mean, that's probably fairly easy but whoever does it better be really committed to this project.

It would be interesting to estimate the millions of people in the world that are likely to be completely inaccessible and would never get a dollar.

For example, North Korea. The government would insist on running the distribution itself, and because they are always in dire need of foreign cash, most or all of it would be diverted to some other purpose.

OP here: I don't see why you'd be downvoted for this, it's a fair point! I agree with each of your three points, and in response I'll change the requirements a bit:

How can I get 1 dollar to as many people as possible, while spending the least amount of money on transactional costs or fighting fraud/corruption?

I think all of the edge cases you named above can be dealt with given this new requirement. Some fraud and corruption will happen for sure, just like with any financial transaction anywhere in the world. I would say that fighting fraud/corruption is only worth it, if the cost of fighting it is less than what you'd lose to it if left unchecked. A dead grandma will be too expensive to disprove, but someone making thousands of fake personas must be detectable somehow, such as re-using the same bank account or adress a thousand times.

Remove $8B worth of carbon from the atmosphere.
Planting an $8bn forest would actually be pretty neat.
That will not be an equal distribution as the rich and the old won’t gain as much benefit as a poor child
Now that's the kind of inequality I can live with.
The same is true of a dollar. If I gave a new born baby a dollar and a person on their deathbed a dollar, the baby will gain much more of a benefit.
Also people living in countries where the US dollar is actually used will gain much more of a benefit.
You should not do this even if it is possible to do so. Many people can't accept "free" money due to their immigration status in countries they are residents of. If you send money to them and they receive it they could be in violation of their entry permit rules.

So by sending money to everyone in the world you would create problems for a huge population of immigrant workers.

Start walking and handing out larger sums and asking each person to help carry your one dollar idea to reach every person? For a decent amount of countries that would probably be the best method, just walk for the next 40 years
It's probably not possible to get everyone a dollar. But maybe add an incentive on top to get local community involvement with assisting you? Create multiple million dollar lottos per region. To enter the lotto, proof of receipt of the dollar is necessary. How that's figured out is another issue. Even with this you still won't reach everyone on Earth. Getting past terrorist leaders, or anyone who doesn't want their people to claim a dollar will be a big hurdle. But adding incentives to accept the dollar might get you the most recipients.

Also once you achieve your goal, global chaos will ensue.