Twitter policy page forbidding links to other social media removed
It's returning a 404 ... the original is available via the wayback machine.
https://web.archive.org/web/20221218200110/https://help.twit...
Consider contributing to them.
https://web.archive.org/web/20221218200110/https://help.twit...
Consider contributing to them.
115 comments
[ 0.24 ms ] story [ 184 ms ] threadAlso removing a page is not a solution, they need to come up with an explicit policy at this point.
I signed up to Mastodon yesterday just in case.
Mastodon requires engagement to get your network established, and if you don't bother engaging, you'll get much less from it. If all you want is entertainment and amusement, maybe staying on Twitter is your best bet.
https://fedifinder.glitch.me/
https://twitodon.com/
It's got a long, long way to become anything close to Twitter.
E.g. https://mstdn.social/@feditips/109507990803168318
- I click "Follow."
- Servers talk to each other.
- I get redirected to a URL with a unique hash on the other server. It tells me what I'm agreeing to and I agree.
- I get redirected back to a URL with a unique hash on the original server.
There are a lot of other protocols possible. This one doesn't rely on CSRF or other features, so it should continue working even with security features of future browsers.
In that case, you can do it by selecting your home server. That's a search drop-down. Something like mastodon.social is there by default, and for historians.social, you might need to type in 'his' <click>.
I don't feel too bad about that either. It's like oauth, only instead of just having two options (Google and Facebook, typically), you have an unlimited options if you're willing to type a little bit more.
Or like SSO on many Microsoft web sites, where I type in my work domain or email, and it redirects through my work.
I see like three trends that all seem to be dead, so I have no idea what people in the world are actually talking about. All I see is that about 500 people talked about the FIFA World Cup final game during the past 48 hours, since that's taking two out of three top trends.
"Tweets" are much longer, so it no longer feels like microblogging. Sensitive content feels even dumber, I don't want to click "Read more" in order to view a tweet like it was some kind of a ad-bait blog post.
If someone sends me their profile link that's not on my instance, I can't actually reply to it. Instead, I need to go to my Mastodon instance and then search for that link in order to actually have an interactable version of that "tweet".
Everything also feels slower, possibly because it's having to juggle between so many different instances.
And I have no idea if I chose the right Mastodon instance with the right hall admins that won't read my private messages and ban me for having the wrong opinion.
I'd much, much rather stay on Twitter. It's just that no one has any idea if it's going to be a viable platform in the future and who are going to stick around there.
I heard other folks who're more in the security mindset explain it that you shouldn't just trust your particular fediverse/mastodon instance not to read your private messages. If you have something truly private, exchange contact details for some other secure thing and have that conversation there. For instance, Signal.
Actually, you have options:
https://mstdn.social/@feditips/109507990803168318
> And I have no idea if I chose the right Mastodon instance with the right hall admins that won't read my private messages and ban me for having the wrong opinion.
I'm working on that.
https://github.com/soatok/mastodon-e2ee-specification
While messages can be longer, IME they tend to be about Tweet length.
Content Warnings are optional and can be expanded automatically by your client.
> And I have no idea if I chose the right Mastodon instance with the right hall admins that won't read my private messages and ban me for having the wrong opinion.
Valid. But I'm not sure this is much different at Twitter. And at least with Mastodon, you can leave and take your data with you. If you're concerned about this, you have the option of hosting yourself. I know a lot of people rankle at that suggestion but Twitter doesn't even give you that option.
Can I? Because if I go to Import settings, I can see options to import my "Following list", "Blocking list", "Muting list", "Domain blocking list" and "Bookmarks". How do I move my posts and media?
Also, are these export options still accessible to me if the local hall monitor bans me? With Twitter, they are required to allow me to export my data under the GDPR and I feel like my local Data Protection Ombudsman might actually have some power to compel Twitter to do so. With Mastodon, I have less confidence.
So if you feel like it is dead, or only football, spend a while looking for things and people that interest you.
To follow people from other instances, just search or follow the link through the instance you are already logged into, and all you have to do is click a follow button.
I would recommend looking for an instance that has some sort of similarity with what you are interested in. For example, I joined the Irish instance mastodon.ie so I know there will always be a stream of slightly humourous shite talk in the local time line. But there is also a good infosec instance, and a good quantum research instance.
But look, I never liked twitter in the first place, so maybe, yes for twitter people, Mastodon just won't scratch that itch!
But it is true that it depends on the buyer. But there is new hope at least, if the ownership changes.
Give it 24 hours.
For example Valve is a great example, how a private company can be successful and respect it's customers.
But the problem is, that the price is still going to be high for Twitter when it will sold again, even if the price is just a fraction. Not many are willing to buy it and then reduce profits by thinking the best of its users.
It's in Twitter's interest to say those links are now allowed, while still actually blocking them for at least another 24 hours to stem the outflow.
When they introduced the no-links-in-bio policy I imagine they had not actually written the code to scan 1 billion Twitter accounts for bios and tweets in violation of that policy.
Since they introduced the link blocking silently, they will just leave it in place silently. Maybe they’ll get sued by a competition regulator in one of the dozen jurisdictions that this kind of thing is illegal in.
(Edit, the rule list was not comprehensive, so you will find plenty of counter-examples. Possibly by design to make people think it isn’t happening.)
https://mastodon.social/@oatmeal/109383511262415597
I see no need to wonder about that one. It wasn't ever going to happen but it served well to get people aligned on pulling his cart.
Going from that to "don't post links to other sites" and as much of a 180 as you can go
I wonder who at Twitter thought this was a good idea. We only know about the one guy, do we? Was the rest just forced into implementing it, knowing it would set their ship on fire?
If I was still at Twitter (by my own decision, ie not visa, etc), I would just enjoy the ride and see where it goes instead of trying to save the product and oppose Elon.
Note how when he suspended various journalists for posting screenshots of the Elonjet account after he changed the ToS on a whim, he first posted a 5 minute poll asking when they should be unsuspended with "now" being the result with the most votes, then deleted it and redid it with a 24 hour duration and just the options "now" (effectively meaning "tomorrow" as it would not be acted upon before the 24 hours were up) and "in 7 days". The poll again ended with "now" winning (by an even bigger margin). He obviously expected the original poll to go in his favor (after all, 5 minutes means it will mostly reach his direct followers and not have as much of a chance to exit his bubble). He even phrased the question in the most misleading way possible, referring to the accounts as having "doxxed my location in real-time" (again: this referred to posting screenshots with Elonjet's Mastodon account handle being visible).
Pretending this is in any way democratic or representative decision-making is absurd. Even when he reinstated various suspended far-right accounts (note that far-left accounts remain banned and he has since banned other far-left and even moderately left-wing accounts for less) he stated he would not reinstate Alex Jones for entirely personal reasons.
It doesn't matter if the polls are "rigged". They're not representative, they're not democratic and he doesn't care (nor is he legally required to). Calling them "rigged" is a distraction at best and normalizing the anti-democratic conspiracy theories about "rigged elections" at worst.
As a cynic, I agree with the anonymous quote in that article:
> "His investors are surely looking at this now and questioning whether he was the right horse to back. I imagine he's getting pressure from investors to step down and is using this poll to make it look like he's following the will of the people instead of the will of those paying his bills."
I didn't see his name in the court documents. He must have been on the Tesla emails which coule not be used because of an undocumented Tesla policy giving Musks email special privacy rights.
Worth remembering that it also applies to all(or most) unsuccessful CEOs too, and there are a lot more of those.
>>Nonetheless he currently has a Teitter poll up if he should step down as a head of Twitter (and the majority voted Yes) and says he will do it if yes wins
I personally hope the poll votes NO, purely to make him stick with it and continue this circus for a while longer without an easy excuse of "the poll voted yes so I'm resigning". I'm seeing plenty of articles already claiming he will appoint a new CEO within the next 24 hours though.
The guy who claims degrees in fields that never existed at a university he never studied at is not "too interested in other people's opinions"?
The guy who made sure to add a clause in his separation agreement with PayPal that required PayPal to list him as a founder despite having made no meaningful contribution is not "too interested in other people's opinions"?
The guy who gave himself the title "Chief Engineer" at his own company SpaceX despite having no credentials or other qualifications in aerospace engineering is not "too interested in other people's opinions"?
The guy who replied to a random person's tweet about him being booed at a Dave Chapelle standup show to insist that it was actually 90% cheers and 10% boos except for the quiet parts, deleted that reply and then still insisted that he was only booed because the crowd consisted of woke SF leftists (who famously dislike Chapelle due to his recent history of mocking trans people) is not "too interested in other people's opinions"?
The guy who fired the entire communications department of Twitter so all requests for comment would have to go to him just like with his other companies is not "too interested in other people's opinions"?
The guy who slept on the factory floor at Tesla likely contributing nothing whatsoever by doing so is not "too interested in other people's opinions"?
The guy who became Twitter famous for pumping dogecoin, sharing other people's memes without attribution and trying to incorporate the numbers 420 and 69 into anything he can is not "too interested in other people's opinions"?
The guy who went through multiple chaotic rounds of layoffs after buying Twitter, regulations and local labor laws be damned, even going so far as to make the remaining employees virtually sign multiple "pledges" to do what he says is not "too interested in other people's opinions"?
I'm sorry to say, but based on his actions alone Elon Musk is one of the most insecure and fragile individuals on Earth and seeks constant reaffirmation by surrounding himself with yes-men and wielding whatever power he can get his hands on to shield himself from being subjected to any criticism.
But you're right in that he wouldn't be where he is if he were any different. His Twitter buyout literally started as a "meme" and blew up spectacularly because of his utter disregard for the law (or specifically in this case: contract law). He's used to get by by presenting himself as "real-life Tony Stark" and people are increasingly waking up to the fact that he actually is neither an actual engineer nor even remotely as business-savvy as everyone used to believe. Peter Thiel once called him a con artist and no matter what one may think about Thiel this description seems increasingly apt.
Backtracking is just the cherry on top. Nowhere is such an impactful decision (I mean, crappy decision) is done on such a whim
The Emperor's birthday suit is revealing itself day by day
It was the plan B all along.
Has social media been a benefit for humanity? I think most of us were happier before being drawn into these advertisement honeytraps of outrage.
Definitely yes. It was a miracle when in started, it changed everything. But at a later stage it was ruined by engagement and ads and recommended content and crippled ux. I’ve not used any social network for years because I just couldn’t force myself to get through the piles of crap just to connect with my friends and contacts. I’ve been using other methods since then.
Just because it “changed everything” doesn’t mean it was a benefit to humanity. In what ways would you say it has been beneficial for humanity? We already have plenty of communication tools for keeping in touch with friends.
Nothing that covers the same gamut of easy to use, easy to find people, etc.
The biggest problem that I see with social media is when it teams up with political influence and then we end up with problems such as Cambridge Analytica and democracy gets damaged.
It’s especially useful for furry artists, to use an example I’m familiar with. Dedicated sites exist, but only hardcore furries go to them. Twitter is large enough that they can reach dabbling furries (or people who don’t realize they’re into furry stuff but The Algorithm has deduced this from their habits) in addition to their core audience.
The only other website that suits this audience right now is Tumblr, which seems to slowly be reanimating.
Also useful: https://furryfediverse.org/
I think there's countless people that didn't come from big cities or tech circles that managed to make friends across the world and get better paying jobs and move out from their home country thanks to social media. I even have friends that started businesses together after meeting on social media
So yes it's been a benefit for humanity!
My personal view is that they have not been a net positive for humanity and have created a generation of young people with more mental health issues and less attention span amongst other issues.
Depends on who you include in "twitter addicts". I'd bet most Twitter users have barely even noticed. The interesting thing is that the group who care the most and are the most angry about it, who I will refer to as the "league of blue checkmarks", are also the group who most derive their own personal power and influence from Twitter, discouraging them from leaving.
If I talk to my mom and asks her about Facebook; She loves it because she can message other family members with photos and stuff.
So to answer your question with my opinion, yes, social media has connected us globally and locally, even with all the issues that you and I are aware of, but most people aren't.
Yup. Most people are not technically inclined, and just use a computer, and platform, as tools.
They don't care who owns twitter, or is someone was banned from it, unless it was someone they follow. Even then 'meh'.
Even facebook/meta? Most people have no idea about the Cambridge Analytics scandle, and don't even see the issue if explained.
This whole post is a bubble. No one cares.
Which is also why Mastadon will never grow outside said bubble. It's unfortunate but it's also waaaaay too technical. The general population will always stick to centralized platforms out of accessibility and usability.
> advertisement honeytraps of outrage
You are describing an experience that is utterly unfamiliar to me.
I can't say whether it's been a net benefit for humanity, but at least speaking personally I'm glad it existed.
I've been thinking the same lately. This is a critical public service.
We now have about 12K accounts with around half active. We've grown in fits'n'starts, and in the last 72 hours we've had about 800 new accounts.
This screenshot is from Nov 23rd: https://www.solipsys.co.uk/images/SCR_20221123_102916.jpg
This is today: https://www.solipsys.co.uk/images/SCR_20221219_112249.png
Here are new accounts over the past 8 weeks or so:
https://www.solipsys.co.uk/images/SCR_20221219_113810.png
In case anyone wants to discuss it or add other stats, I've submitted that separately here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34050994
My friend was experiencing a lot of stress in his life at the time, which the doctors says most likely induced the schizophrenia.
It looked a lot like what is happening with Musk now.
It's probably best we just focus on our own platforms/websites. Haha
That's hilarious. Do you honestly believe that they are equivalent? Or is this some kind of joke that I'm missing?
I can go to any market place in Germany and lead a demonstration that’s about how Germany sucks and that we should all emigrate to Canada. I can even bring info material that shows you all the steps about how to emigrate to Canada. That would be a perfectly legal demonstration in Germany and I think in most democratic societies that have basic human rights. I cannot imagine any of those societies considering that subversion, sedition or treason and considering such harmless protests a crime.
I’m not a fan of this Twitter policy but I was also not a fan of what the company was censoring before. Its absurdly stretched definition of disinformation was a problem, but one that fit the political goals of many tech types who are now upset about the Mastodon thing.