51 comments

[ 13.7 ms ] story [ 991 ms ] thread
If I'm understanding this correctly, they're only devaluing points when you redeem them for cash or transfer them to another points system. In so doing, they're effectively creating lock-in for their own points redemption programs.

The cynical part of me wonders if they timed this change to coincide with the SVB debacle in the hopes that the negative PR would be drowned out.

You think they planned, executed, and released this change in under 48 hours, mostly over a weekend?
based on headlines, it looks like they've been working all weekend
(comment deleted)
You know it’s easy to have a change staged and only pull the trigger at the right moment, right?
So they had the change staged and were waiting on the off chance a bank collapsed?
Waiting for any big news. Maybe waiting for a specific known event in the future but pulled the trigger early.

Or it’s just a coincidence.

Yes. It would just be a constant in the code somewhere.
Every time I’ve used a platform OTA, the prices were way higher and less choices (even with the point discount) than I could purchase on another OTA.

I never considered platform OTAs a reasonable option.

There are good ones. Chase Sapphire is an example, and I think people like Amex too though I don’t use it.
Correct. Chase and Amex use the prices from the airline. They aren't as good as the scammy aggregators, which try to upsell you further in the purchase process or tell you the price is no longer available
Don’t they have more blackout dates than the airlines?
For fare sales or awards?

If anything, I find it is the opposite. The US Big 3 have very little inventory open - and what is open is super expensive. (Let’s say $10k worth of airline miles for sake of argument.)

You’re better off using CC points for tickets through the card’s OTA where you can get the above $10k itinerary for $2k worth of points - and since the value per point is known and fixed, this price is never a surprise.

There are no good travel portals. If you need to change anything or if there are any issues, going through a portal is alway a pain compared to booking directly.

Amex in particular for domestic flights have Delta and JetBlue as a partner. You get much better value by transferring to one of those two than booking through a portal.

You will only get 1 cent per point by using the portal. You can routinely get 1.2 - 1.5 cents per point for Skymiles

I used AMEX via ANA transfer to get over $0.20/point value on a pair of business class tickets from West Coast US to Japan this last year.

I’d say that was good value.

As someone who has an idea about transfer partners.

There is a huge difference between being able to book a flight on a random day from a random place to a random destination and just choose to pay with miles like I can do on any random Delta domestic flight for 1.3 - 1.5 cpp and having to deal with partners and waiting for award flights to open up and then only on certain days and from certain cities.

This was an arbitrary date and the transfer took less than 30 minutes.

It was my first time using it and it was about as painless as I could have hoped for.

I will say that we mostly only fly to a couple places and we mostly fly ANA, so we are an edge case.

Okay, so you’re actually using Ana to book flights directly instead of trying to use ANA to book flights on other airlines in the same alliance - in ANAs case Star Alliance.

In that case, I take back everything I stand corrected.

Yeah, I can't imagine the headache to do THAT.

The ANA flights in these cases were Star Alliance operated long haul legs paired with shorter ANA operated legs, and we got to see both the older and newer business class for Delta (typical for most routes; we aren't where ANA runs their specific long haul). Newer is MUCH nicer.

> I used AMEX via ANA transfer to get over $0.20/point value on a pair of business class tickets from West Coast US to Japan this last year.

Would you have paid anything close to the cash price though?

If not, the $0.20/point value seems to be more of an arbitrary number often abused by bloggers.

I probably would have bought the $1250 tickets instead of the $5k tickets, but we certainly appreciated the upgrade.

It's what I have the cards for, after all.

> I probably would have bought the $1250 tickets instead of the $5k tickets, but we certainly appreciated the upgrade.

It’s all about perspective.

For instance, my wife and I end up doing the MCO <-> ATL route a few times a year. We live in Orlando and our family/friends are in ATL.

(Don’t quote me on the exact numbers. I found something similar when I looked a couple of months ago)

I could fly main cabin for 13,000 miles one way and get around 1.3 cpp on Delta Main cabin. Alternatively, I was able to find a Delta flight booked through Virgin Atlantic for 18000 miles first class where I would get 1.7 cpp.

The value chasers would have chosen Virgin Atlantic. I fly Main anyway and it wasn’t worth the extra 5000 points.

While 5000 points is only worth about $75, even with my best earning Amex Point categories - groceries and dining at 4x on the Gold - I would still need to spend $1250 to recoup those points.

Also, the standard issue with booking through partners is that only a limited number of award bookings are open and usually first class. I could find multiple flights on any given day on Delta. I could find only one during the week on Virgin Atlantic.

They’re all just white-labeled Expedia.
Yes that’s the consensus. It was a tool to drive new accounts and now they don’t need that tool.

The fact that it’s wildly unethical to do it this way without notice is something I guess they feel isn’t important to them.

Not a good look for someone in the financial services business.

I was a client up until last year but I closed my account because they seemed shady.

> The cynical part of me wonders if they timed this change to coincide with the SVB debacle in the hopes that the negative PR would be drowned out.

Being in the news for any reason is the last thing a bank wants right now. With startups and the public so much on edge, a simple "omg look at this, Brex is in trouble" tweet can be enough to cause them serious harm.

My guess is the exact opposite – the announcement was pre-planned and they went ahead with it, but some middle manager is going to be getting an earful for not delaying it until the sector is out of the woods.

Brex isn't a bank. They partner with a dozen or so banks including JPMorgan (https://www.brex.com/legal/brex-cash-partner-banks).

And, it's clear keeping out of the news was not their strategy this weekend bc the CEO has voluntarily been making public statements in a successful attempt to drive account signups.

Tweeting "we will help startups affected by SVB" is very different from announcing major policy changes in your own operations.
There's a third possibility: "get our rewards terms stable and sustainable before we have a massive influx in new accounts so we don't shock the new accounts by clawing things back any time soon."

I have a feeling Brex was quite prepared for this whole thing to play out. With the degree of polish on https://www.brex.com/svb-emergency-line, and the ability to double in a single weekend the number of banks they spread deposits into... whether it was simply because their own analysts saw this happening at some point and had a proactive play-by-play of what to do, or something more coordinated with the VCs advising their companies to move their funds to Brex, is something that I'm sure will be of interest to many in the industry.

Would not be surprising if Brex had insider information from connections/advisors who were executives at SVB.
I thought that I'd heard that Brex had ties to Peter Thiel.
there was no announcement it was unannounced

generally you do not devalue a program without at least a few weeks or months of notice.

very anti customer and not surprised if it leaves bad taste for existing customers. that alone leads me to think it was an immediate reaction to a significant inflow of deposits and new business. these rewards programs are extremely expensive to run.

Points don’t usually get devalued from the credit card to the transfer partners. But most airlines and hotels use “dynamic pricing” and they devalue points all the time. So it’s the same thing
…how else are you supposed to use your rewards outside of cash redemption or airline transfer

airline transfer is generally the best ROI way to use credit card points so this is a massive unannounced devaluation by any measure

Welp time to switch corporate credit card providers.
The name is too similar to Brexit. Too confusing. Why would they choose such a name?
I heard is due to the founders being Brazilian so:

American Express - Amex Brazilian Express - Brex

Two days after "Emergency bridge loan for SVB customers" offered by Brex: https://www.brex.com/svb-emergency-line - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35102196

~8 months after "[Brex will] no longer offer services to the small business market" - https://www.brex.com/support/why-am-i-no-longer-qualified-to... - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31772211

Further context, Brex is a YC company (Winter 2017), their launch post is here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17418813 "Launch HN: Brex (YC W17) – Corporate Credit Card for Startups" | 183 points | June 28, 2018 | 126 comments

I guess the bridge loan doesn’t matter now that the depositors of SVB are getting their funds tomorrow?
I'm sure at least some people jumped on the offer as the situation was very uncertain up until just some ~13 hours ago.
FWIW - this is extremely common among other credit card point systems. Including airline miles, etc.

Not sure if this is really news or if it’s just another credit card company doing what credit card companies do.

It’s not really.

They do devaluations no question about that. But a zero notice change in the ratio of transfer points would be unusual and definitely cause a lot of screaming.

It’s not an ethical thing to do. If you tell me I can do X that helps you and then you’ll give me Y you can’t just change that.

Devaluing with a little notice is a different thing entirely. Even short notice is dubious but defensible.

This not so much. Of course the only thing it will do is cause people never to trust their rewards programs, giving them further rationale to ditch them.

no it isn’t. my chase, amex, cap 1 points transfers to the exact same airlines as Brex at 1:1 ratio and always has

the airlines and hotel programs do change and devalue their programs from time to time but not the credit cards that offers transfers to these programs

Capital One actually got better — they used to be 2:1.5 before improving to 1:1, as well as adding more transfer options.
With Ramp, cashback is the only reward option, no gimmicks subject to devaluation. Ramp offers fixed 1.5% cashback on statement balances, and there's no spend requirement before it kicks in. Much better way to go.
I hope Ramp is ready for the massive influx in signups that this will result in. We're considering moving our spend entirely to them because of this change.
So what's the best thing to do with lots of Brex rewards now?
There is nothing I’ve heard about Brex that is good.
Oh wow, no-notice devaluations make a rewards / card program pretty much radioactive.