31 comments

[ 0.22 ms ] story [ 28.8 ms ] thread
Happens.

I worked at a startup that offered to triple my equity if I stayed a full four years, a special offer to me for seven months of excellent performance. Four months later, growth below projections, they laid me off 19 days before my 1 year cliff. 3/9ths of the engineering team, gone.

The lesson I’ve learned is to never, ever, put long hours into a startup you don’t own. Ever.

woah that is super rough actually. i'm sorry gjsman-1000 thanks for sharing on HN sincerely. i think more war stories makes the world a better place, in that we build the culture forward one brick at a time. one human talking to another, at a time. this is powerful stuff.
OP, feel bad for obviously unpleasant situation, but I don't think the way this is written makes you come across in a good light at all. Maybe just me?
Reading things like this is the primary way I learn that I'm getting old.

I mean, I just don't get it. There doesn't seem to be a purpose, and no ostensible benefit to be had.

So.. why were you fired?
this is the question i've been waiting for

from zach and cat too haha i wish everyone just asked this question like if the world woke up and all the LLMs could talk and they just asked everyone

i suspect elon's truth seeking grok would just have a easy answer here. if only the info sources and context windows aligned.

https://computerfuture.me/posts/context-windows

^ i may or may not have written this on a-z.md first

Im not really sure what you are wanting to communicate here?

is it that you need a new job and this is the hook? or do you have some insight into better ways of being letgo/fired/parted ways with?

its also not clear how long you were there for? (i'm not in the business of stalking people on linkedin)

It's hard to tell what is sincere vs sarcastic here
ok like that other guy i like you triyambakam lets be friends you have good comments. thanks!
this is what they call "flooding the zone" in offensive defense strategy lango lingo
I see why someone hired you (prestige), I see why someone fired you (terrible communicator, egoistical, lack of professionalism/tactless).

The tactlessness is just awful. I would consider deleting that post.

That's more forced laughter in one blog post than I was interested in suffering through.
I feel for you, getting fired is pretty terrible, and and everyone assumes you did something bad to earn it.

But you forgot to say a few things in your post:

Hey everyone, I made an expensive move and changed my life for a job, and it didn't work out. In fact, I got fired. If anyone is looking for someone with experience in X Y and Z, I'm your guy.

Reading the title, I thought the company did something horrible to you, but I must have missed it from the text.

(The biggest crime I see in this text though is the inconsistent capitalization in sf)

to be clear: company did nothing horrible. obviously. i have repeatedly stated how great they are.
(comment deleted)
What is this writing style…OP is a 12 year old girl? Penguin of doom…
i am in fact also a penguin and a girl.
I'm so confused by what I just read. What was the point of that? Why is this on hn? It's incoherent and almost manic; I'm a bit worried the author might be experiencing some kind of mental health crisis.
why was this flagged? 44 points and great discussion here.
Writes email about how you aren’t working well with the founder and are happy to “remove yourself”.

Then is curious why you get “fired”.

Why did you include emails threatening to blackmail Simple AI to get more money ("wondering what a fair exit package looks like ... and what I should post on Linkedin to update my network"), then indicating that after you received $20K in payment, you "wouldn't bother" them? All of this following a him-or-me demand email.

And then making this post? It's a pattern of self-destructive behavior.

The best possible course of action at this point is deleting the blog post. Note that the separation agreement you signed prohibits you from sharing any Separation Information—including consideration (in this case the $20K figure you reference is part of the consideration). Your blog post is public evidence and even this comment I'm making right now could end up in discovery if your former employer wanted. If I were you, I would not antagonize them further.

The dominant goal is to produce the most entertaining public blog and life story.

One method is to "fail" at secondary goals which others insist are primary.

Comments can be posted with care, to influence the next episode. 1st-3rd degree reverse psychology is the sweet spot.

At least he's not in any legal trouble...

If you are looking for your next job, just consider that your future employers will read your blog and your comments here. Since you consider yourself as a CEO type, you are fine, then. However, when you want to raise money from VCs, the latter can also read your comments.
Was there more content here at some point, or something? I can’t follow this at all.