74 comments

[ 0.22 ms ] story [ 7.5 ms ] thread
people good w/ linux would not have been holding their breath for companies which keep intelligence for a premium & h0st@ge depending on policy
FYI; This link shows Codex based on your current OS. I get a norwegian landing page with a download link for Windows.
If that’s an Electron app, what’s the difference with running it in the browser?
For someone who has not tried these desktop apps: what is the the advantage versus cli codex with some MPCs and multiple folders each one with their context files?
Not using it day today but projects and pinned session seem useful, mentally
For me the main one is in-app browser with feedback you can do that's native to its elements lika a network inspector. All "real" browsers felt too broken when I tried them.

The bad part of the setup is: you still have to tell it to ssh into your dev container and make changes there (since that's where the linux running dev server is). Most work still via cli, which is faster and much more lightweight in token usage.

This will make it much easier to trap people into installing it without any isolation just to their primary user account or even make it run with admin privileges by default.

With the recent security related events we already see that it seems to be wide spread practice that many operators avoid the hassle of isolating their agents.

It is just an incredible cultural experience to see how quick stupidity gets accepted as a behavioural default.

Download it a few hours ago. I've been waiting a long time for linux and it is working fine in debian kvm via X11
Reminder to everyone, treat these as trojans. Run them isolated from the rest of your system.

Give it a full desktop in a VM if you want to, just not direct access to your system.

Do people really use that? It seems horrible to turn your computer into a spydevice for AI slop spammers.
I'd love to see the stats on how many Linux users want this. Most Linux usage probably comes from WSL/SSH'ing into servers, where they would use the CLI instead of a GUI. Even for the people who run Linux on the desktop, most probably prefer the terminal anyways
What's the benefit of working with this app, which eats insane amounts of memory, instead of Codex CLI?
Why not create a separate account on Linux just for the agent? This security measure should also be enabled by default. Many packages REQUIRE the creation of an account, but agents do not. Interesting.
Does this mean that ChatGPT Desktop will run now also on Intel Macs?
oh Electron, leave my ram alone.
I think these styles of apps will be popular for OpenAI and Anthropic as they help solve some of their moat issues. The deeper you integrate someone's files into their app, the harder it will be to switch AIs
Plague of AI slop.

A senior engineer in an Open Source project told me "I haven't looked at code in months"

In which case what TF is it you even do ?

Does this mean it is possible to talk to Codex from ChatGPT on a mobile phone now?

When I tried that with the Codex CLI version on a Linux VM, I did not get it to work. Possibly because OpenAI only supports connecting ChatGPT to a desktop installation of Codex?

I tried it yesterday. The experience seems smoother than on Windows. I hope Computer Use will be added soon. Also, when will OpenAI fix the issue where Xhigh and Ultra are both translated as “极高” in Chinese? It’s been this way for quite some time. As far as I know, the proportion of Chinese employees at these Silicon Valley AI companies is quite high.
Much prefer CLI because its easier to isolate
The most remarkable things about this announcement:

- Electron based app: Electron is a framework sold on the basis of enabling rapid cross-platform development at the cost of performance.

- Frontier AI company: AI is sold on the basis of enabling rapid development

- App was released in February & took 6 entire months to port to Linux

It’s only remarkable if they actually took 6 months of engineering effort to build this. It’s more likely that it just never got prioritized.
Linux users have stronger preferences for the terminal than either Windows or macOS users. Even the same person will use the terminal more in Linux than the other two!
Is there anything it can do that Codex CLI can't?
(comment deleted)
Heads up: unlike Codex CLI, Codex Desktop is proprietary, and thus can't be audited for Claude Code style hidden anti-user behavior.
Are there really daily driver Linux users that want to run a proprietary gui based LLM solution that Sam Altman gets to keylog AND have full remote code execution on their system? This feels like trolling.

Meanwhile I am looking at a Crush client running beside neovim in a herdr session I am accessing via ssh to a machine in my garage with 4 local GPUs. I think we Linux users have got this without Sams help.