I remember when I worked for a registry (not a registrar) before the first launch of gTLD's. Bizarrely one of the products they were excited to promote was not to register domains under a TLD, but rather, to _block_ them. The idea being that if you wanted to make sure someone else didn't register <company_name>.[sucks, stupid, whatever] you had to pay them (Donuts) to make sure it didn't happen. It felt extortionate.
I worked on the .name application, and it was a key thing we were basically required to demonstrate we could do even back in 2000. ICANN was obsessed with protecting trademark holders.
I'm pretty sure I'd be very happy reading something on just.cos every day, and as well copy.con too, might be very topical .. but sin.cos and contra.con and bin.con are gonna get bumpy ..
can't believe their going to get away with stealing & re-allocating third level .name addresses while simultaneously enshittifying the domain name system with any of these unworthy and over-long addresses.
44 comments
[ 124 ms ] story [ 239 ms ] threadNot the worst outcome, but…it’s going to be a mess.
It should be available to the public and businesses without a(nother) company in between: if we had our act together.
If my counting is correct (the results wrap across multiple pages), 13 companies applied for the .agent TLD.
Apparently it's still a thing. https://kb.centralnicreseller.com/services/brand-protection/...
Because it is.
These events have nothing to do with domains. They are funding rounds for the corrupt organisation known as ICANN.
No, ICANN mission is to make more money and maintain strong monopoly. Maybe they can be honest about it.
Or , if you are evil, .con or .prn or .com1
https://sohib.github.io/icann-2026-gtld-explorer/
Apparently .agent the most requested with 13 orgs applying for it.
Followed by .bit with 11, and .api, .brand, .hub with 10 each.
And apparently "Link Freedom Group Ltd" has 213 active applications, and "XYZ.COM LLC" has 182 active applications.