There is no reason that has to be a power of 2.
And in Germany if you somehow cause more damage than that, you have to pay the remainder out of pocket, and Germany is much better at enforcing payment than any other country. That's right, if you crash into a…
What does that even mean? The insurance is for the person who gets a hand cut off in an industrial accident. It's not for the employer.
Everyone benefits from a universal accident coverage scheme.
If people want to die in a ditch they should not be driving. Americans have to drive to get money and have to get money to eat.
Countries hack each other much more than that. When it becomes publicly noticed it gets stern words. Otherwise nothing.
No you don't. Studies always show that you don't. You think you do, but you don't. Before the ad, you didn't even know the product existed. Now you know it exists, making you infinitely more likely to buy it.
Using a real browser is also easy.
Doorway effect, once you click on it you forget you're not sure it's the real Chase Bank.
Threads were traditionally cooperatively scheduled, too. Expensive context switch is an artifact of implementation.
Well this discussion about getting YouTube premium is clearly aimed at people who use YouTube but without premium, not people who don't use YouTube at all.
And either the runtime enforces it or it doesn't and just notifies you, but I think whether it notifies you once or continually is not a relevant question.
You can't. The admins can.
Aaron Swartz's sentence was death FYI.
The more disturbing thing to me was the talk about "LG households".
This is such a programmer view. No lawyer would think that a graphic equaliser records audio.
No phone has ever been caught doing that. But TVs and phones have been caught collaborating. What brand is your TV?
That's probably the program that uploads everything you say then. Nobody thought the ACR was doing that.
They deny ACR uses the microphones. Big difference. Nobody thought ACR used the microphones.
They're not denying anything about programs other than ACR. That's telling. They didn't say "your TV doesn't listen" or "your TV doesn't collect"
They're almost certainly being pedantic about what it means to "collect a recording".
Also, they didn't claim that.
> So they are claiming that ACR is done entirely through audio processing, and no visual data from the screen itself is used? That...doesn't seem plausible. Wrong. They claim it doesn't record video. Recording means…
What if you're wrong?
If they're not offering something of value why are you using the thing that you say doesn't have value?
There is no reason that has to be a power of 2.
And in Germany if you somehow cause more damage than that, you have to pay the remainder out of pocket, and Germany is much better at enforcing payment than any other country. That's right, if you crash into a…
What does that even mean? The insurance is for the person who gets a hand cut off in an industrial accident. It's not for the employer.
Everyone benefits from a universal accident coverage scheme.
If people want to die in a ditch they should not be driving. Americans have to drive to get money and have to get money to eat.
Countries hack each other much more than that. When it becomes publicly noticed it gets stern words. Otherwise nothing.
No you don't. Studies always show that you don't. You think you do, but you don't. Before the ad, you didn't even know the product existed. Now you know it exists, making you infinitely more likely to buy it.
Using a real browser is also easy.
Doorway effect, once you click on it you forget you're not sure it's the real Chase Bank.
Threads were traditionally cooperatively scheduled, too. Expensive context switch is an artifact of implementation.
Well this discussion about getting YouTube premium is clearly aimed at people who use YouTube but without premium, not people who don't use YouTube at all.
And either the runtime enforces it or it doesn't and just notifies you, but I think whether it notifies you once or continually is not a relevant question.
You can't. The admins can.
Aaron Swartz's sentence was death FYI.
The more disturbing thing to me was the talk about "LG households".
This is such a programmer view. No lawyer would think that a graphic equaliser records audio.
No phone has ever been caught doing that. But TVs and phones have been caught collaborating. What brand is your TV?
That's probably the program that uploads everything you say then. Nobody thought the ACR was doing that.
They deny ACR uses the microphones. Big difference. Nobody thought ACR used the microphones.
They're not denying anything about programs other than ACR. That's telling. They didn't say "your TV doesn't listen" or "your TV doesn't collect"
They're almost certainly being pedantic about what it means to "collect a recording".
Also, they didn't claim that.
> So they are claiming that ACR is done entirely through audio processing, and no visual data from the screen itself is used? That...doesn't seem plausible. Wrong. They claim it doesn't record video. Recording means…
What if you're wrong?
If they're not offering something of value why are you using the thing that you say doesn't have value?