Ask HN: How much of unlimited PTO do you use?
If you have unlimited PTO how much of it do you actually use? I can see how unlimited PTO can work if you are working on projects - you take time off between projects. But what if you are a team lead or if your job is infrastructure related? Do you have a team mate that covers for you and then you cover some other person when needed?
96 comments
[ 3.7 ms ] story [ 158 ms ] threadWhen in doubt, if some corporate executive wants to do it, 99% of the time it's to absolutely fuck you over as hard as possible. Corporate leadership at most companies in the U.S. are parasitic insects existing solely to suck the blood out of the company until their next spawning cycle when they sprout wings and fly off looking for another victim. Never doubt it.
Does your company have any offices in California? Is this policy applied to those offices in California? If the answer to both questions is "yes", then have a coworker in California talk to a labor lawyer to see if California might consider this PTO policy wage theft.
(For context: California considers PTO to be part of your wage, and considers companies that attempt to weasel out of paying PTO to be engaging in wage theft. Based on what I've read California courts give "non-accrual"/"unlimited"/"flexible"/"whatever-they-are-called-these-days" PTO schemes _extra_ scrutiny, because those things hide all sorts of ways to deny workers the wages that they're owed.)
Dictator needs to be a ruler, that also you cannot get rid of. In most of the us you can ditch your boss tonight.
It looks like you want a real dictator to “protect” you from possible poor decisions you can make. Which is fine, just don’t get me and others like me involved please.
The US labor system is so insanely broken I don't even know where to begin.
The government should be responsible to provide a minimum of quality of life to its citizens, to give away this power is to relinquish one of the main benefits of being a State.
End of child labour and slavery was imposed onto a lot of societies without everyone's consent, it doesn't mean it is wrong for the government to do so.
Imposing a minimum of paid time off to humans, allowing humans to have time off from work to actually enjoy being humans, is to determine a minimum baseline of quality of life to all of your citizens. You seem to rather prefer to only allow that to a privileged class, because that's what happens in reality when the government does not impose a modicum of morality into the system.
No not at all. I believe lower skilled workers are on this position due to the policies we have had for some time now, which most of them actually support. I respect all workers that contribute honestly.
Hint: Not to protect the handful of super rich billionaire type owners. I know, I know, unique concept as an American...
Not every country has 'SuperPACs' and other corrupt ways of getting elected by throwing enough corporate millions and billions one way though.
I can conclude then that you are also not an advocate against child labour, as that is a mandatory scheme pushed through government. You are also not an advocate against monopolies, since those are regulated through the government.
Yikes. You really were expected to do 1900h+ per year previously and the current situation got even worse?
Have you heard the one about "our open office plan is meant to enhance the opportunities for collaboration?"
It shouldn't be on you to organize cover. At any level, the level above should have considered this. You can't be a single point of failure - well except for small startups perhaps.
And agree with the other comments that unlimited PTO is a way to reduce PTO or the liability to have to pay for your PTO should you leave / get sacked.
When you are going on vacation you can pick somebody in your team as the to-go person and communicate that fact to them, to your manager, and add that information to your automated "out of the office" emails.
If management doesn't have the people to handle their employees taking the leave that they're entitled to, __that's not your problem__. Your responsibility is to announce your planned absence in advance, write and distribute any hand-off materials required as your planned absence approaches, and then take your leave at the announced time.
I understand that in some Bay Area companies the rate is now 25%
I'm not familiar with the concept of unlimited PTO, only with the concept of PTO by law, by tariff system (unionised jobs) and by individual employment contracts.
German law says you have to have at least 24 days PTO, given a 5 day 40h week. It's common to have ~30 days PTO in most professions.
And of course you don't give anyone your money, the employer is in charge to organise that people can take time off. And sometimes this is done by having everyone off at the same time.
They would need to use at least the legal minimum, which in Britain is unchanged from the EU minimum of 20 days.
(I once had a colleague who received a letter from HR reminding him of this requirement, recommending he take all 30 days leave at his preferred time, rather than doing nothing and being required to take the last 20 working days of the year off.)
I'm a lead _and_ I manage infrastructure. If you're a lead and your team can't handle you being out for a week then you need to spend more time leading and less time doing. Being out for longer requires active planning.
So I don't think it would be an issue in the UK either, but the company needs to do the accounting right.
It's a small company, so it's an honour system. I've taken far more than my contractual minimum every year I've worked here, so having to get backpay or carry over hasn't come up just yet.
Many companies offer better than that as an additional benefit. For example, I currently get 24 days + 9 public holidays (Scotland) for a total of 33 days. I think I get an additional day after I've been with the company 4 years.
You can't silo information if the silo can go off grid for a month or more.
You can't have a dependency on a single individual without predictable and avoidable consequences, and what might have taken years to show up instead is obviously going to be you can see coming within the year.
Your SMEs and high performers won't feel the pressure to avoid taking time off, and they'll need to improve documentation and knowledge/skill sharing. Managers will have incentives to support that as well.
Unlimited PTO is mostly a scam. PTO had a real monetary value as part of a compensation package. Many companies will pay it out in cash when you leave. If PTO is “unlimited “ it basically means the company has decided to not compensate you with PTO. Since no one is “owed” PTO everyone starts treating it like something they don’t deserve and the company develops a culture of not taking time off.
Of course a company’s leadership could still strongly encourage time off in an “unlimited “ situation, but the easiest way to do that is to actually compensate people with PTO!
Depends where you are located.
https://gusto.com/resources/articles/hr/termination/pay-accr...
Here in Germany the minimal number of vacation days that have to be granted (by law) is 20 days, but it's rare to have that few days in knowledge worker positions.
Unless you're the CTO you should not really worry too much about a vacation replacement, isn't this your bosses responsibility?
Btw don't burn out by not taking vacation. Life is short. You will regret this when you get older.
Now to your question: 30 days is the norm for knowledge workers. Days off, including: when you are sick, when your kid is sick so you have to take care of them, special occasions such as death of a close relative, marriage, relocation) don't get counted on these 30 days at all.
https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/themen/praeventi...
That’s impressively generous.
It’s 10 (accumulating to 20) here in New Zealand and bereavement is an additional few days - the amount depends on your relationship to the deceased. All the above is paid at your usual rate.
It's 30 days paid holiday per year. The legal minimum is 20-something is most EU countries, but professional jobs tend to have 25-35, depending on the country.
Sick leave is completely independent of that. If you're sick you don't work. If there's any doubt, you get a signed note from a doctor. If the sickness lasts a long time there are eventually other procedures, and after long enough you can lose your job if there's really no reasonable alternative.
I turned down 2 other jobs that had unlimited PTO where you could really only get 2-3 weeks max.
Most people in my company do about the same. Some take more, or structure it more compactly, a couple take less.
As for infrastructure and team leads, that comes down to people and process. With standard processes and checklists that everyone's familiar with (and as much automated as possible), and with people frequently communicating and reviewing and discussing stuff, then if someone's out other people should be able to step in and pick up what they would normally do. And with the right people, they will.
That said, I definitely still have the mindset of "I'll save all of my ammo for the final boss" which is dumb because it's unlimted.
Mostly I just figure I'll think about using it next week and then it gets easy to push back.
I suppose if I hated my job, or it wasn't fulfilling and needed the escape, it would be a different story mind you.
That said, I know there are some supposed to be some studies floating around that people with unlimited PTO tend to take less leave.
I also have to take a day off almost monthly for medical treatments. At a standard US job, I’d probably end up with 3 days of total annual PTO leftover, and I’d probably have to save the “sick days” (which don’t stick around too easily with my health issues).
At my current job, it only works because they’re not preventing us from taking the time (for now).
Not really. Unless you get paid out for it when you resign it's not really a minimum.
Here is a serie of fun facts about paid time off in many parts of europe, and specifically in France where I'm at, that can help you see the issues :
One, we have a defined number of days, and in fact everytime you see it mentionned it is in weeks. There is no competition, official or unofficial or in you head, or in your manager's head come promotion time about who took more or less.
Two, we have a defined "holiday period" covering several months, where employee are encouraged to take their holiday, and HAVE to take their main holiday (at least 12 continuous working days, so excluding sundays and saturdays), so there is no issue of "it's not the right time" etc etc ... The employer retain a final say in granting holidays and which order people go (to avoid complete service disruption etc ...) but again, any refusal especially in the main holiday period must be justified BY THE EMPLOYER. PS: this is what causes the funny "the whole of France is not working in August" thing.
Three, your days off can only be "pushed back" one year, after that you lose them, so you're very encouraged to take them and not accumulate them years after years, and there is a clear value being shown to you of "you lost X days worth Y €" instead of a vague "you could have".
Four, if you leave the company (either on your own decision or being fired) they need to pay them to you, and it's the biggest expense when ending someone's contract, so employer have a big incentive to keep employee's available day count low, the way to do that being make them go on their holiday.
Five, if the employee doesn't take his holiday during the year, and ends up having a mental breakdown or whatever, it is considered the employer's fault, you are supposed to make sure your employee take their holiday, and yes you can force them to take their holiday in a two year period at the most.
The entire system is built around the knowledge that if you simply say "people can", then you make it a competition between them in front of the boss, so instead we make the ones who don't take holidays a problem.
Now, as a company owner, at first it's scary (oh shit, we're small scale and some employees are going to leave for three weeks, how will the company ever function), but you quickly learn happy people plan to rejoin their job and want it to be not stressfull, so they plan their work in advance, they ask their collegues to handle what calls or emails or whatever need to be done when away, etc ... You essentially never have that issue.
And then you learn the best trick ever to handle stress at work : free, employer sanctionned day off are the employee's equivalent of turning it off and on again. Sometime it's a "you can take a couple day off" and let them decide, sometime it's "you know, take the end of the week ... no it's not a question, don't be there tomorrow" so again force their hand to be off, and you get a much better environnement of work.
Your first impressions as an employer is that holidays are sort of a gift, or a regulation or whatever. If you pay attention, you quickly learn holidays are not a gift, they're a way for your employee to just ... fucking function properly ? Be liberal with it, you don't need to lose sight of work that need to be done, and if you treat your employee as humans you quickly see that they understand that too.
Sorry for the much longer than planned comment.
It’s annoying, because under the previous system if I worked a weekend or public holiday, I’d get an extra concrete day to use. Now I don’t.
So by law in Ireland I have to take minimum 20 days PTO, and interestingly, there’s a little known rule that says I’ve to take 2 weeks off in a row as part of that.
Which I never twigged until recently when comparing the employee handbook to employment laws for fun. This rule is a blessing and a curse tbh.
This year so far I have taken about two actual days off, and I usually work on public holidays because I simply forget when they are.